Obsoleted

Zed AgentOps

Zed AgentOps helps you run an edit → verify → commit workflow inside Zed with a local MCP server and a project template designed for resumable agent work.

Currently supported on macOS.

What it does

• Creates a project template for using AgentOps in Zed
• Provides a local MCP server for repository, verification, and resume-oriented workflow helpers
• Adds default verify and verify-release entry points that you can extend for your project
• Keeps enough local state for the agent to resume work more reliably across interrupted sessions
• Aligns the generated project template, runtime workflow rules, and helper behavior around the supported v0.5.4 contract

This README is written for users of the tool. It focuses on how to set up and use AgentOps in practice.

Installation

Install with Homebrew:

brew intall rioriost/tap/agentops_mcp_server

This installs:

• agentops_mcp_server
• zed-agentops-init

Usage

Zed configuration

Before you start using AgentOps in a project, configure Zed to use the MCP server.

For v0.5.4, this is effectively required. The intended workflow assumes:

• the MCP server is registered in Zed
• the Agent Panel can call the AgentOps tools it needs
• the commonly used AgentOps tools are pre-allowed in tool permissions

Add the MCP server to your Zed settings:

{
  "agentops-server": {
    "command": "/opt/homebrew/bin/agentops_mcp_server",
    "args": [],
    "env": {
      "PATH": "/opt/homebrew/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin"
    }
  }
}

Then allow the MCP tools the workflow depends on. A practical baseline is:

{
  "terminal": {
    "default": "allow"
  },
  "mcp:agentops-server:workspace_initialize": {
    "default": "allow"
  },
  "mcp:agentops-server:tx_event_append": {
    "default": "allow"
  },
  "mcp:agentops-server:tx_state_save": {
    "default": "allow"
  },
  "mcp:agentops-server:tx_state_rebuild": {
    "default": "allow"
  },
  "mcp:agentops-server:session_capture_context": {
    "default": "allow"
  },
  "mcp:agentops-server:repo_verify": {
    "default": "allow"
  },
  "mcp:agentops-server:repo_commit": {
    "default": "allow"
  },
  "mcp:agentops-server:repo_status_summary": {
    "default": "allow"
  },
  "mcp:agentops-server:repo_commit_message_suggest": {
    "default": "allow"
  },
  "mcp:agentops-server:tests_suggest": {
    "default": "allow"
  },
  "mcp:agentops-server:tests_suggest_from_failures": {
    "default": "allow"
  },
  "mcp:agentops-server:commit_if_verified": {
    "default": "allow"
  },
  "mcp:agentops-server:ops_compact_context": {
    "default": "allow"
  },
  "mcp:agentops-server:ops_handoff_export": {
    "default": "allow"
  },
  "mcp:agentops-server:ops_resume_brief": {
    "default": "allow"
  },
  "mcp:agentops-server:ops_start_task": {
    "default": "allow"
  },
  "mcp:agentops-server:ops_update_task": {
    "default": "allow"
  },
  "mcp:agentops-server:ops_end_task": {
    "default": "allow"
  },
  "mcp:agentops-server:ops_add_file_intent": {
    "default": "allow"
  },
  "mcp:agentops-server:ops_update_file_intent": {
    "default": "allow"
  },
  "mcp:agentops-server:ops_complete_file_intent": {
    "default": "allow"
  },
  "mcp:agentops-server:ops_capture_state": {
    "default": "allow"
  },
  "mcp:agentops-server:ops_task_summary": {
    "default": "allow"
  },
  "mcp:agentops-server:ops_observability_summary": {
    "default": "allow"
  }
}

Adjust permissions to match your own security preferences, but if these tools are blocked the intended workflow will be incomplete.

Machine-readable workflow responses

In v0.5.4, lifecycle-aware responses are intended to be machine-readable enough for an agent or client to decide what to do next without relying only on prose.

For lifecycle-relevant success responses, the normalized guidance fields include:

• ok
• canonical_status
• canonical_phase
• next_action
• terminal
• requires_followup
• followup_tool
• active_tx_id
• active_ticket_id

When the information is available, responses may also include contextual fields such as:

• current_step
• verify_status
• commit_status
• integrity_status
• can_start_new_ticket
• resume_required

These fields describe the resulting canonical state after the tool completes. In other words, they are meant to tell you whether you should begin, resume, verify, commit, explicitly end the task, or stop because the canonical state is blocked.

Lifecycle- and state-related failures are also intended to expose structured recovery guidance. The normalized failure shape includes:

• ok: false
• error_code
• reason
• recoverable
• recommended_next_tool
• recommended_action

When known, failure responses may also include canonical state or integrity context, such as the current status or phase, the active transaction identity, terminality, and integrity-related metadata.

A practical way to interpret the main fields is:

• canonical_status and canonical_phase describe the resulting canonical transaction state
• next_action describes the next lifecycle step that should be taken
• terminal tells you whether the transaction is already terminal
• requires_followup tells you whether more lifecycle work is still required
• followup_tool identifies the explicit follow-up tool when one is required

Helper completion does not always mean the transaction is finished. In particular, successful commit helpers may leave the transaction in non-terminal committed, which still requires explicit terminal closure such as ending the task with done or blocked.

Initialize a project with zed-agentops-init

Create or update an AgentOps-managed project with:

zed-agentops-init my_project

or:

zed-agentops-init --update my_project

Use --update when you already have an older AgentOps template and want to refresh it to the current workflow contract.

What initialization creates

Running zed-agentops-init sets up the files you need to start using AgentOps in Zed:

• .rules
• .zed/tasks.json
• .zed/scripts/verify
• .agent/tx_event_log.jsonl
• .agent/tx_state.json

It also:

• creates a Git repository if one does not already exist
• appends common ignore entries to .gitignore
• preserves existing files when possible
• supports --update to refresh an existing setup

The baseline .agent/tx_state.json is intentionally a normalized empty-transaction state. It includes the major top-level fields and metadata needed for normal runtime interpretation, including:

• schema_version
• active_tx
• last_applied_seq
• integrity.state_hash
• integrity.rebuilt_from_seq
• integrity.drift_detected
• integrity.active_tx_source
• updated_at

This baseline is designed to be compatible with the richer runtime-rebuilt state shape without inventing runtime-only facts that can only be known after canonical event replay.

Open the project in Zed

After initialization:

1. Open the project directory in Zed
2. Make sure your MCP server configuration is active
3. Open the Agent Panel
4. Confirm the agent can access the required AgentOps tools
5. Start work from the initialized repository root

For the supported workflow, the agent should initialize the workspace root before root-dependent operations and should treat .agent/tx_state.json and .agent/tx_event_log.jsonl as the canonical local workflow state.

The intended interpretation of lifecycle-aware responses is tied to that canonical state. Clients should rely on the structured response fields to understand whether there is an active transaction to resume, whether a new ticket can start safely, and whether helper success still leaves explicit follow-up work.

Configure verify / verify-release as needed

The generated template includes:

• .zed/scripts/verify
• .zed/scripts/verify-release

The default verify script is intentionally conservative. Extend it to match your project.

A common Python-oriented setup is:

• verify: fast local checks for day-to-day work
• verify-release: more complete checks for release-oriented validation

For example, in a Python project you may want:

• .zed/scripts/verify to run ruff check, ruff format --check, and pytest -q
• .zed/scripts/verify-release to run full coverage, such as pytest --cov

The default release-oriented coverage entry point is:

.zed/scripts/verify-release

This requires pytest-cov to be available if you use it for Python coverage.

Initialize the language-specific project itself

AgentOps provides the workflow template, but it does not replace your language or package manager’s own project initialization.

For example, for a Python project with uv you might run:

uv init

Then add the checks your project needs to .zed/scripts/verify and .zed/scripts/verify-release.

Likewise, for other ecosystems you should initialize the actual project using the tools that ecosystem expects before asking the agent to make meaningful changes.

Create a docs directory and write a draft

For the v0.5.4 workflow, it is useful to create a docs directory in the project and write a draft such as:

docs/draft_0.1.0.md

This draft is where you describe:

• goals
• scope
• constraints
• priorities
• phases
• possible tickets

You can write the draft entirely yourself, or you can work with the AI agent to refine it. Both approaches are valid.

A practical pattern is:

1. Create docs/
2. Write an initial draft with the requirements you already know
3. Ask the agent to help refine the draft into a phase-oriented plan
4. If useful, maintain derived planning artifacts with the agent such as:
   • docs/__version__/plan.md
   • docs/__version__/tickets_list.json
   • docs/__version__/pX-tY.json
5. Use those planning files as workflow guidance while the work is in progress

A helpful way to think about the planning flow is:

• draft.md is the place to describe the problem, goals, scope, constraints, and priorities
• plan.md is the place to turn that draft into phased execution guidance
• tickets_list.json is a compact index of the tickets you intend to work through
• pX-tY.json files are optional per-ticket detail records for inputs, outputs, acceptance criteria, and notes

If you maintain ticket artifacts, a practical status set is:

• planned
• in-progress
• checking
• verified
• committed
• done
• blocked

Important v0.5.0 boundary:

• planning files under docs/ are useful workflow artifacts
• they are not mandatory server-managed protocol state
• the server does not guarantee generation, synchronization, or validation of those planning artifacts for you
• if you choose to maintain them, keeping tickets_list.json and the per-ticket files in sync is recommended operating practice

They are best understood as user- or client-managed workflow documents.

Updating from older versions

If you already use Zed AgentOps, run:

zed-agentops-init --update <project>

This refreshes the user-facing template, especially:

• .rules
• .agent state file presence
• default verify/task templates where applicable

Updating is recommended when moving from an older template, because recent versions tightened:

• resumability behavior
• transaction/state alignment
• workflow rule clarity
• template/runtime consistency

In most cases, --update is enough.

What's new in v0.5.0

The most important user-facing changes in v0.5.0 are about clarity and predictability.

1. The documented workflow is closer to the real supported workflow

The main goal of v0.5.0 is to reduce mismatches between:

• .rules
• the generated template
• runtime server behavior
• helper tools
• release-facing documentation

As a user, that means the documented workflow is more trustworthy than before.

2. Ticket files are convention, not server protocol

If you keep planning files such as:

• docs/__version__/plan.md
• docs/__version__/tickets_list.json
• docs/__version__/pX-tY.json

they are useful workflow documents, but they are not canonical server-managed state.

In practice:

• you can maintain them manually
• you can maintain them together with the agent
• but you should not assume the server automatically creates, synchronizes, or validates them

3. The canonical local workflow state is under .agent/

For practical use, the most important canonical artifacts are:

• .agent/tx_event_log.jsonl
• .agent/tx_state.json

Handoff and planning docs are helpful, but they are not the canonical workflow record.

4. Commit workflow is more explicit

The supported flow is stricter:

• verify before commit
• no commit when there are no changes

This reduces accidental empty commits or unverified commits.

5. File-intent workflow is easier to use safely

The supported helper surface now includes:

• ops_add_file_intent
• ops_update_file_intent
• ops_complete_file_intent

These helpers make common file-intent workflows easier to follow without weakening the canonical transaction rules.

6. Bootstrap state is easier to reason about

The initial .agent/tx_state.json baseline is more normalized, so users and clients are less likely to misread missing fields as ambiguous old-template behavior.

7. Version concepts are intentionally distinct

You may see different version concepts, and they do not all mean the same thing:

• package/server version
• transaction/schema version
• draft/release-plan version

This is expected. Do not assume that a docs version label is automatically the same thing as the persisted transaction schema version.

Practical recommendations for users

For day-to-day use in v0.5.0:

1. Keep your template current with zed-agentops-init --update when needed
2. Treat .agent/tx_state.json and .agent/tx_event_log.jsonl as the canonical local workflow state
3. Treat planning files under docs/ as useful convention, not guaranteed server protocol
4. Extend verify and verify-release to match your project
5. Prefer small, clearly scoped drafts in docs/ before large agent-driven work
6. Expect the agent workflow to follow initialize → change → verify → commit more strictly than before

For a fuller release-facing explanation of the supported v0.5.0 client/server contract, see docs/v0.5.0/interoperability.md.

Notes

• macOS only at the moment
• The generated template is meant to be customized per repository
• The default verify scripts are intentionally conservative and may need project-specific additions
• The v0.5.0 workflow distinguishes between enforced protocol behavior and user-managed workflow convention; that distinction is intentional

License

MIT