behive
Open-source research engine that extracts structured knowledge from any topic via MCP, enabling AI assistants to get verified, scored claims and entity graphs from live sources.
README
<p align="center"> <img src="demo.gif" alt="BeHive — Deep Research Engine" width="720" /> </p>
<h1 align="center">🐝 BeHive</h1>
<p align="center"> <strong>Open-source research engine that extracts structured knowledge from any topic.</strong><br /> Feed it a question. Get back scored claims, entity graphs, and a synthesized report — not paragraphs of slop. </p>
<p align="center"> <a href="https://pypi.org/project/behive"><img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/pip_install-behive-FFB300?style=for-the-badge&logo=python&logoColor=white" /></a> <a href="https://www.npmjs.com/package/n8n-nodes-behive"><img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/n8n-community_node-FF6D5A?style=for-the-badge&logo=n8n&logoColor=white" /></a> <a href="#self-hosting"><img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/Docker-compose_up-2496ED?style=for-the-badge&logo=docker&logoColor=white" /></a> <a href="LICENSE"><img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/License-MIT-22c55e?style=for-the-badge" /></a> <a href="https://api.yu-na.io/docs"><img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/API-Live-4FC3F7?style=for-the-badge&logo=fastapi&logoColor=white" /></a> <a href="#mcp-integration"><img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/MCP-Native-AB47BC?style=for-the-badge" /></a> </p>
<p align="center"> <a href="#quick-start">Quick Start</a> • <a href="#use-with-claude--chatgpt--gemini">Use with AI Assistants</a> • <a href="#drone-arsenal">Drone Arsenal</a> • <a href="#benchmarks">Benchmarks</a> • <a href="#architecture">Architecture</a> • <a href="#api-reference">API</a> • <a href="#self-hosting">Self-Hosting</a> • <a href="#integrations">Integrations</a> </p>
The Problem
You ask Claude to research a topic. It gives you a confident-sounding summary based on training data that's months old. No sources. No structure. No way to verify.
You ask Perplexity. Better — it cites sources. But the output is still unstructured text. You can't query it, cross-reference it, or build on it.
BeHive is different. It produces machine-readable intelligence: typed claims with confidence scores, entity relationship graphs, and structured JSON you can pipe into any downstream system.
Your AI assistant → BeHive → Verified, structured, scored knowledge
├── 363 claims (avg quality 0.824)
├── 42 entities with relationships
└── Synthesized report with citations
Quick Start
pip install behive
# Set your LLM API key (you use YOUR OWN subscription — BeHive costs nothing)
export ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=*** # or OPENAI_API_KEY
# Start the server
behive serve
That's it. BeHive is now running:
- API →
http://localhost:8091(REST endpoints) - MCP →
http://localhost:8090/mcp(for AI assistants) - Docs →
http://localhost:8091/docs(Swagger UI)
🔌 Setup with Claude Desktop (30 seconds)
You bring your Claude subscription. BeHive adds research superpowers. No extra cost from us.
Step 1: Install and start BeHive:
pip install behive
export ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=*** # your own key
behive serve
Step 2: Open Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config → paste:
{
"mcpServers": {
"behive": {
"url": "http://localhost:8090/mcp",
"transport": "streamable-http"
}
}
}
Step 3: Restart Claude Desktop. Done. Now ask:
"Research the EU AI Act enforcement timeline and penalties"
Claude will call BeHive automatically, fetch 200+ sources, and return scored claims instead of guessing from training data.
<details> <summary><strong>What happens under the hood</strong></summary>
You ask Claude a question
↓
Claude calls BeHive MCP tool "research_topic"
↓
BeHive scouts 70+ APIs, fetches 1000+ URLs via stealth drones
↓
Your LLM key extracts claims (Claude Haiku = ~$0.50 per mission)
↓
BeHive scores, deduplicates, builds knowledge graph
↓
Returns structured report to Claude
↓
Claude presents findings with confidence scores and source links
Cost: ~$0.30–$2.00 per research mission (your Anthropic/OpenAI tokens). BeHive itself: free forever (MIT license). </details>
🔌 Setup with ChatGPT (Custom GPT)
Step 1: Start BeHive on a server with a public URL (or use tunneling):
pip install behive
export OPENAI_API_KEY=*** # your own key
behive serve --host 0.0.0.0
# Expose with a tunnel (for testing):
# npx cloudflared tunnel --url http://localhost:8091
Step 2: Create a Custom GPT at chat.openai.com/gpts/editor:
- Name: "Deep Researcher (BeHive)"
- Instructions: "You are a research analyst. Use the BeHive actions to research topics. Always cite claim confidence scores."
- Actions → Import URL: paste your server URL +
/openapi.json
Or manually add this schema:
openapi: 3.1.0
info:
title: BeHive Research API
version: 0.2.0
servers:
- url: https://*** paths:
/research:
post:
operationId: startResearch
summary: Start a deep research mission
requestBody:
required: true
content:
application/json:
schema:
type: object
required: [query]
properties:
query:
type: string
description: Research topic or question
depth:
type: integer
default: 3
description: 1=quick, 3=standard, 5=deep
responses:
'200':
description: Mission started successfully
/research/{mission_id}:
get:
operationId: getResearchResults
summary: Get completed research with scored claims
parameters:
- name: mission_id
in: path
required: true
schema:
type: string
responses:
'200':
description: Research results with claims and report
/claims/search:
get:
operationId: searchKnowledge
summary: Search across all previously researched knowledge
parameters:
- name: q
in: query
required: true
schema:
type: string
- name: limit
in: query
schema:
type: integer
default: 20
responses:
'200':
description: Matching claims with scores
Step 3: Use your Custom GPT. Ask: "Research quantum computing breakthroughs 2026"
🔌 Setup with Cursor / Windsurf / Any MCP Client
Any editor or tool supporting MCP works identically to Claude Desktop:
{
"mcpServers": {
"behive": {
"url": "http://localhost:8090/mcp",
"transport": "streamable-http"
}
}
}
Available MCP tools:
| Tool | Description |
|---|---|
research_topic |
Start a deep research mission (returns job_id) |
mission_status |
Poll running mission progress |
get_report |
Get synthesized report for completed mission |
search_knowledge |
Search all previously extracted claims |
🔌 Setup with Hermes Agent / OpenClaw
Hermes Agent (automatic — skill already published):
# BeHive skill auto-loads when you ask Hermes to research anything
# Just ensure behive serve is running on the same machine
behive serve
OpenClaw:
# Install from integrations directory
cp integrations/openclaw/SKILL.md ~/.openclaw/skills/behive-research.md
Drone Arsenal
BeHive doesn't just search the web. It deploys stealth drones — multi-layered fetch agents that break through anti-bot defenses, paywalls, and rate limits.
8-Layer Evasion Stack
Every URL goes through an escalation cascade. If Layer 1 gets blocked, Layer 2 fires. All the way to Layer 8.
Layer 1 │ DIRECT — aiohttp + full Chrome 131 headers
Layer 2 │ UA ROTATION — 10 browser fingerprints (Chrome/Firefox/Safari/Edge)
Layer 3 │ curl_cffi — TLS impersonation (JA3/JA4 fingerprint matching)
Layer 4 │ primp — Rust-native TLS, newer fingerprints than curl_cffi
Layer 5 │ nodriver — Headless Chrome via CDP, passes Cloudflare Bot Management
Layer 6 │ patchright — Stealth Playwright (no Runtime.enable/Console.enable leak)
Layer 7 │ Jina relay — r.jina.ai proxy (paywall + captcha bypass)
Layer 8 │ Archives — Wayback Machine + archive.org fallback
What they bypass
| Defense | How |
|---|---|
| Cloudflare | Detected → escalate to nodriver/patchright (JS challenge solved) |
| DataDome | TLS fingerprint rotation (primp/curl_cffi) |
| Akamai Bot Manager | CDP-based headless + real browser UA pool |
| Rate limits | Automatic backoff + UA rotation + parallel diversification |
| Paywalls | Jina relay proxy + archive.org cache |
| Turnstile CAPTCHA | patchright stealth Playwright |
| 403/429 blocks | Smart retry with escalation, never hammer the same layer |
Parallel fetch architecture
┌─── HEAD sweep (974+ URLs, async semaphore) ───┐
│ │
▼ ▼
┌─────────────────┐ ┌────────────────┐
│ Resource Router │ │ Domain Recon │
│ (8 resource │ │ (tier scoring │
│ types detected)│ │ reputation) │
└────────┬────────┘ └───────┬────────┘
│ │
┌──────────┼──────────┬──────────┐ │
▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼
api_bee pdf_drone std_drone heavy_drone domain_score
(70 APIs) (VLM parse) (Layer 1-8) (patchright) (0.0 - 1.0)
Routing decisions per resource type:
api_endpoint→ Direct API bee (structured JSON, no parsing needed)pdf→ PDF drone (Vision LLM extraction)static_html→ Standard drone (Layer 1-4 usually sufficient)spa→ Heavy drone (Layer 5-6, needs JS execution)paywall→ Jina relay or archive fallbackrss_feed→ RSS bee (structured, fast)database_portal→ Dedicated connector (custom scraping logic)
70+ API Sources
Scout bees don't just Google. They query specialized APIs across 37 categories:
| Category | APIs | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Academic | 5 | arXiv, Semantic Scholar, CrossRef, OpenAlex, CORE |
| Financial | 6 | SEC EDGAR, Yahoo Finance, FRED, ECB, World Bank |
| Government | 5 | TED (EU procurement), SAM.gov, UK FTS, BZP (Poland), GUS |
| Security | 6 | CVE/NVD, Shodan, VirusTotal, AbuseIPDB |
| Development | 8 | GitHub, npm, PyPI, crates.io, Docker Hub, Homebrew |
| ML/AI | 5 | HuggingFace, Papers With Code, Replicate, Ollama |
| News | 4 | NewsAPI, GNews, TheNewsAPI, Mediastack |
| Crypto | 2 | CoinGecko, CoinMarketCap |
| Patents | 1 | Google Patents (via SerpAPI) |
| Medical | 1 | PubMed/NCBI |
| ... | 25+ | Trade, geopolitics, environment, demographics, ... |
Total: 70 APIs, 125 endpoints — each checked per-mission based on topic relevance.
Benchmarks
Real results. No cherry-picking. Scale 30 (standard depth).
Hardware: EC2 g6.24xlarge — 4× NVIDIA L4 (92 GB VRAM), 96 vCPU, 384 GB RAM
Models: Bedrock Claude Haiku (bulk extraction) + Sonnet (enrichment), SGLang/Qwen on local GPUs
| Topic | Claims | Avg Quality | Duration | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA GPU market 2026 | 290 | 0.797 | 8 min | 234 |
| OpenAI GPT-5 capabilities | 574 | 0.789 | 12 min | 174 |
| EU AI Act enforcement | 267 | 0.759 | 6 min | 130 |
| Perplexity AI business model | 267 | 0.759 | 7 min | 150 |
| Meta Llama 4 architecture | 568 | 0.821 | 11 min | 198 |
Quality score meaning:
0.90+— Exceptional: specific numbers, dates, sources, fully verifiable0.82+— Excellent: multi-dimensional, publication-ready0.75+— Good: useful intelligence with some specifics0.65+— Acceptable: general facts, entered into DB<0.55— Rejected: too vague, not stored
Honest scoring, no tricks. No sigmoid rescaling, no artificial inflation. The score is a weighted average of specificity, information density, uniqueness, verifiability, and structure.
Architecture
┌──────────────────────────────────┐
│ BeHive Pipeline │
└──────────────────────────────────┘
│
┌───────────┬───────────┬───────┴───────┬───────────┬───────────┐
▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼
┌─────────┐ ┌─────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌─────────┐ ┌────────┐
│ SCOUT │ │ HARVEST │ │ PROCESS │ │ V4 │ │ SYNTH │ │ GRAPH │
│ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │
│ Queen │ │ Parallel│ │ BeeHive │ │ Haiku │ │ Claude │ │ Neo4j │
│ plans │ │ HTTP │ │ fast │ │ extract │ │ report │ │ entity │
│ 5 axes │ │ 1000+ │ │ extract │ │ + Sonnet │ │ + cite │ │ fuse │
│ × N │ │ URLs │ │ + score │ │ enrich │ │ │ │ │
└─────────┘ └─────────┘ └──────────┘ └──────────┘ └─────────┘ └────────┘
│ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ ▼ │ │ │
│ │ ┌──────────────┐ │ │ │
│ │ │ Quality Gate │ │ │ │
│ │ │ conf ≥ 0.55 │ │ │ │
│ │ │ dedup 0.60 │ │ │ │
│ │ └──────────────┘ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │
└──────────────┴────────────┴────────────┴────────────┴──────────┘
│
┌─────────┴─────────┐
│ PostgreSQL │
│ Claims + KG │
│ 25K+ records │
└───────────────────┘
What makes it different from GPT-Researcher:
- Dual-model extraction — Fast model (Haiku) for bulk extraction, powerful model (Sonnet) for enriching thin claims. Not just "summarize this page."
- Quality scoring — Every claim gets a 0.0-1.0 score. Below threshold = rejected. No filler.
- Knowledge graph — Entities and relationships persist across missions. Research compounds.
- 70+ API sources — Not just web search. SEC filings, arXiv, patent databases, government APIs.
- Deduplication — Jaccard 0.60 threshold prevents the same fact from different sources inflating counts.
API Reference
BeHive exposes a REST API (port 8091) and MCP server (port 8090).
Start Research
curl -X POST http://localhost:8091/research \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"query": "SpaceX Starship launch cadence 2026",
"depth": 3,
"scale": 30
}'
# → {"job_id": "hive_1785227949_815112", "status": "started"}
Stream Progress (SSE)
curl -N http://localhost:8091/research/hive_1785227949_815112/events
event: start
data: {"topic": "SpaceX Starship...", "status": "scout"}
event: phase
data: {"phase": "process", "event": "started"}
event: claims
data: {"count": 142, "avg_quality": 0.791, "above_082": 23, "new_since_last": 18}
event: done
data: {"total_claims": 363, "avg_quality": 0.824, "sources": 64}
Get Report
curl http://localhost:8091/research/hive_1785227949_815112/report
# → {"synthesis": "## SpaceX Starship...", "claims_count": 363, ...}
Search Knowledge
# Full-text search across all missions
curl "http://localhost:8091/search?query=NVIDIA+revenue&limit=20"
# Entity intelligence
curl http://localhost:8091/intelligence/entity/NVIDIA
# Network graph (2-hop neighborhood)
curl "http://localhost:8091/intelligence/network/OpenAI?depth=2"
All Endpoints
| Method | Path | Description |
|---|---|---|
POST |
/research |
Start new mission |
GET |
/research/{id}/status |
Check progress |
GET |
/research/{id}/events |
SSE stream |
GET |
/research/{id}/report |
Get synthesis |
GET |
/search |
Query claims |
GET |
/intelligence/entity/{name} |
Entity details |
GET |
/intelligence/network/{name} |
Relationship graph |
GET |
/intelligence/stats |
System statistics |
Full Swagger docs: http://localhost:8091/docs
MCP Integration
BeHive implements the Model Context Protocol — the emerging standard for AI tool connectivity.
{
"mcpServers": {
"behive": {
"url": "http://localhost:8090/mcp",
"transport": "streamable-http"
}
}
}
Compatible with:
- Claude Desktop / Claude Code
- Cursor IDE
- Windsurf
- n8n (via MCP node)
- Any MCP-compatible client
Tools exposed:
| Tool | Description |
|---|---|
research_topic |
Start deep research on any topic |
mission_status |
Poll progress (phase, quality, claims) |
get_report |
Get the synthesized markdown report |
search_knowledge |
Query claims across all missions |
list_missions |
See completed research history |
Self-Hosting
Docker (recommended)
git clone https://github.com/qa10devteam/behive.git
cd behive
cp .env.example .env # add your LLM API key
docker compose up -d # API ready at localhost:8091
Full stack with knowledge graph + vector search:
docker compose --profile full up -d
Manual Setup
pip install behive[all]
# PostgreSQL
createdb hive
behive db init
# Configure
export BEHIVE_DB_URL="postgresql://user:pass@localhost:5432/hive"
export BEHIVE_LLM=bedrock # or openai, local
# Start services
behive api start # REST API on :8091
behive mcp start # MCP server on :8090
Minimum Requirements
| Component | Minimum | Recommended |
|---|---|---|
| RAM | 4 GB | 16 GB |
| CPU | 2 cores | 8+ cores |
| Storage | 10 GB | 50 GB |
| GPU | Not required | 4× L4 (local LLM) |
| PostgreSQL | 14+ | 16 (pgvector) |
| LLM | Any OpenAI-compatible | Bedrock Claude (Haiku + Sonnet) |
How It Works (for humans)
-
You give it a topic. "NVIDIA GPU market 2026"
-
Scout bees plan the research. The Queen decomposes it into 5 axes (market share, financials, products, competition, supply chain). Generates 12-14 search queries per axis. Checks 70+ APIs.
-
Harvest bees collect sources. Parallel HTTP fetches ~1000 URLs. HEAD sweep first (fast), then full content extraction on promising ones. Typically lands 60-90 usable documents.
-
Worker bees extract claims. This is where BeHive shines:
- Every document gets parsed into atomic, verifiable claims
- Each claim scored on 5 dimensions (specificity, density, uniqueness, verifiability, structure)
- Claims below 0.55 quality → rejected
- Thin claims (missing dates/numbers) → enriched by Sonnet
- Duplicate claims (Jaccard >0.60) → merged
-
The Queen synthesizes. Claude weaves the verified claims into a structured report with inline citations. No hallucination — every statement maps to a scored claim.
-
Knowledge graph grows. Entities (companies, people, products, amounts) and their relationships are stored in Neo4j. Next research mission on a related topic starts with existing context.
Configuration
| Variable | Default | Description |
|---|---|---|
BEHIVE_DB_URL |
postgresql://localhost/hive |
PostgreSQL connection |
BEHIVE_LLM |
bedrock |
LLM provider: bedrock, openai, local |
BEHIVE_LLM_URL |
— | Local LLM endpoint (for local mode) |
BEHIVE_NEO4J_URI |
bolt://localhost:7687 |
Neo4j (optional) |
BEHIVE_QDRANT_URL |
http://localhost:6333 |
Qdrant (optional) |
BEHIVE_SCALE |
30 |
Default research scale (30-300) |
BEHIVE_QUALITY_GATE |
0.55 |
Minimum claim quality to store |
AWS_PROFILE |
default |
For Bedrock authentication |
OPENAI_API_KEY |
— | For OpenAI mode |
Comparison
| BeHive | GPT-Researcher | Tavily | Perplexity | STORM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Output format | Structured JSON | Markdown text | JSON snippets | Text | Wiki article |
| Per-claim scoring | ✅ 0.0-1.0 | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
| Knowledge graph | ✅ Neo4j | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
| Cross-session memory | ✅ Cumulative | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
| MCP native | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
| API sources (70+) | ✅ | ❌ Web only | ⚠️ Search | ⚠️ Search | ❌ Web only |
| Self-hosted | ✅ Full | ⚠️ Needs API keys | ❌ Cloud | ❌ Cloud | ✅ |
| Quality deduplication | ✅ Jaccard 0.60 | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
| SSE streaming | ✅ Real-time | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
| Pricing | Free (MIT) | Free (MIT) | $0.01/search | $20/mo+ | Free (MIT) |
Roadmap
- [x] V4 pipeline (Haiku + Sonnet extraction)
- [x] Quality scoring (avg 0.82+ achieved)
- [x] REST API (27 endpoints)
- [x] MCP Server (Streamable HTTP)
- [x] SSE streaming (real-time progress)
- [x] Knowledge graph (Neo4j)
- [x] 70+ API sources
- [x]
pip install behive(PyPI) - [x] Docker Compose one-liner
- [x] n8n community node (npm)
- [x] Agent skills (Hermes, OpenClaw, Claude Desktop)
- [ ] Web UI dashboard
- [ ] Multi-tenant API keys
- [ ] Webhook callbacks
- [ ] Scheduled recurring research
- [ ] PDF export with charts
Integrations
BeHive works with every major AI agent platform:
| Platform | Method | Install |
|---|---|---|
| Claude Desktop | MCP (zero-code) | Add URL to claude_desktop_config.json |
| Cursor / Windsurf | MCP | Add MCP server in settings |
| Hermes Agent | MCP + Skill | cp integrations/hermes ~/.hermes/skills/research/behive-research |
| OpenClaw | Skill | cp integrations/openclaw ~/.openclaw/workspace/skills/behive-research |
| n8n | Community Node | Install n8n-nodes-behive in Settings → Community Nodes |
| ChatGPT | Custom GPT / API | OpenAPI spec in README above |
| Any MCP client | Streamable HTTP | URL: http://localhost:8090/mcp |
See integrations/ for detailed setup guides.
Contributing
See CONTRIBUTING.md for development setup, code style, and PR guidelines.
git clone https://github.com/qa10devteam/behive.git
cd behive
pip install -e ".[all,dev]"
pytest
License
MIT — use it, fork it, ship it, sell it.
<p align="center"> <sub>Built by <a href="https://qa10.io">QA10</a> · Structured knowledge, not text soup.</sub> </p>
推荐服务器
Baidu Map
百度地图核心API现已全面兼容MCP协议,是国内首家兼容MCP协议的地图服务商。
Playwright MCP Server
一个模型上下文协议服务器,它使大型语言模型能够通过结构化的可访问性快照与网页进行交互,而无需视觉模型或屏幕截图。
Magic Component Platform (MCP)
一个由人工智能驱动的工具,可以从自然语言描述生成现代化的用户界面组件,并与流行的集成开发环境(IDE)集成,从而简化用户界面开发流程。
Audiense Insights MCP Server
通过模型上下文协议启用与 Audiense Insights 账户的交互,从而促进营销洞察和受众数据的提取和分析,包括人口统计信息、行为和影响者互动。
VeyraX
一个单一的 MCP 工具,连接你所有喜爱的工具:Gmail、日历以及其他 40 多个工具。
graphlit-mcp-server
模型上下文协议 (MCP) 服务器实现了 MCP 客户端与 Graphlit 服务之间的集成。 除了网络爬取之外,还可以将任何内容(从 Slack 到 Gmail 再到播客订阅源)导入到 Graphlit 项目中,然后从 MCP 客户端检索相关内容。
Kagi MCP Server
一个 MCP 服务器,集成了 Kagi 搜索功能和 Claude AI,使 Claude 能够在回答需要最新信息的问题时执行实时网络搜索。
e2b-mcp-server
使用 MCP 通过 e2b 运行代码。
Neon MCP Server
用于与 Neon 管理 API 和数据库交互的 MCP 服务器
Exa MCP Server
模型上下文协议(MCP)服务器允许像 Claude 这样的 AI 助手使用 Exa AI 搜索 API 进行网络搜索。这种设置允许 AI 模型以安全和受控的方式获取实时的网络信息。