Bookrail
An MCP server for agent-bookable holiday lets, enabling AI assistants to check availability, get signed quotes, and request bookings with mandatory owner approval.
README
Bookrail
An agent-bookable holiday-let engine. It lets an AI assistant (Claude, ChatGPT, or anything speaking MCP) check real availability, quote a real price, and request a booking — direct, commission-free, with a human owner approving every single request before anything is confirmed or charged.
This is the code behind bookrail.co.uk. It's live today at Rose Cottage, Fife — believed to be the first holiday let in the UK an AI assistant can book end to end.
This repo is a deliberately curated, sanitized copy of the production codebase: real architecture and logic, fictional example property data, no business records. See What's not here below.
Why this exists
More travellers are starting trip planning by asking an AI assistant rather than scrolling a search engine. Most holiday-let websites are readable by an assistant — the text is there — but not bookable: there's no way for the assistant to check a real calendar, get a real price, or actually request a stay. The guest gets bounced back to a contact form, or the property just doesn't come up at all.
Bookrail closes that gap for independent owners, without asking them to give up the one thing that makes a human owner different from a platform: the owner still says yes.
The core idea: agent-bookable, owner-approved
guest's AI assistant Bookrail engine owner's phone
────────────────────── ──────────────── ─────────────
"find a dog-friendly ──MCP──▶ check_availability
cottage near X for get_quote
these dates" get_verified_stay_offer (signed)
"book it" ──MCP──▶ request_booking ──Telegram──▶ Approve / Decline
│
◀────────────────── on approve ──────────────────┘
Stripe Checkout link (deposit only)
◀── guest pays ── Stripe confirms ──▶ booking confirmed,
calendar blocked
Nothing is ever auto-confirmed. request_booking creates a pending hold, not a
booking. A human has to tap Approve on their phone before a guest can even see a
payment link. This is the one hard rule the whole codebase is built around — see
src/holds.js and src/telegram.js.
What an agent actually sees
Four MCP tools, exposed over Streamable HTTP at /mcp (src/mcp.js):
| Tool | Does |
|---|---|
check_availability |
Open date ranges from a live iCal sync (booleans/ranges only — never guest details) |
get_quote |
Total, deposit, and a breakdown for specific dates |
get_verified_stay_offer |
The same quote, but cryptographically signed (see below) |
request_booking |
Creates a pending hold and pings the owner — never confirms anything itself |
Before an agent even calls a tool, it can find the property at all via a discovery
layer generated straight from the property's config
(src/discovery.js):
/.well-known/agent.json— a machine-readable capabilities card/llms.txt— a declarative facts block first, rules after (an assistant that fetches this to answer a question, not to act, needs to find facts in the first screenful — see the comment at the top of that generator)schema.orgJSON-LD (VacationRental,AggregateOffer) embedded in the actual marketing page, not just a side file- A public sitemap and robots.txt pointed at all of it
Signed offers (VRP)
get_verified_stay_offer returns an Ed25519-signed JWS, not just a JSON blob
(src/vrp.js). An agent that has never talked to this property before
can fetch the offer, fetch this domain's public keys from its own /.well-known/jwks.json,
and verify the price cryptographically before it acts on it — instead of just trusting
whatever a random MCP response says. Field names and the JWKS convention follow an
existing published VRP-style convention rather than inventing a new one, so a
VRP-aware agent recognises the document; the implementation here is independent.
Pricing has exactly one source of truth — quoteStay() — and every
other surface (the MCP tool, the signed offer, the JSON-LD price range) calls through
it rather than recomputing anything.
Testing against real AI failures, not just code paths
The test suite (test/discovery.test.js especially) isn't
just unit tests — several are regression guards for specific incidents where a real
model, live, got something wrong. For example: on one occasion Gemini fetched the live
page and told a guest the property was "listed on Airbnb/Booking.com" when it explicitly
isn't. That specific hallucination now has a permanent test (anti-hallucination: no OTA listings) checking the correcting statement is present, worded exactly right, and
positioned right next to the claim it corrects. When an assistant gets something wrong
about the property in the wild, the fix is a config or copy change plus a test that
would have caught it — the same discipline as any other regression bug, just triggered
by a model instead of a stack trace.
Multi-property, by design
Every property-specific fact lives in one config file
(template/property.json, scaffolded per property in
properties/) — nothing about a specific property is
hardcoded in src/. network/ is a small discovery service that
lets multiple properties be found and compared from one endpoint, for a regional
network of independent owners rather than a single listing.
Getting started
npm install
npm test # 270 tests, all pass against the example property below
cp .env.example .env # fill in Stripe + Telegram credentials to run for real
npm run migrate
npm start # serves the example property on :3000
config/property.json and config/rates.json in this repo are a fully worked
fictional example ("Example Cottage") — filled in, not a blank template — so the
test suite and a local npm start both work out of the box. template/ has the blank
version to copy when setting up a real property.
What's not here
This repo is derived from a live, real business — the production repo also contains real customer/lead data, deployment credentials, infrastructure details, and sales strategy, none of which belongs in a public repo. Deliberately excluded:
- Real property configuration, guest data, and booking records
- Deployment/infrastructure specifics (server details, nginx configs, ops runbooks)
- Business planning, competitive research, and outreach material
- The live marketing site's real content (see bookrail.co.uk and rosecottagefife.co.uk directly instead)
Every example domain, email, phone number, and location in this repo (example-cottage.test,
Fiveways, Barleyknowe, etc.) is fictional.
License
PolyForm Noncommercial 1.0.0 — free to read, study, fork, and use for any noncommercial purpose. Not licensed for running a commercial holiday-let booking service, whether that's a direct copy or a substantially similar product. For commercial use, contact hello@bookrail.co.uk.
Built by Grant Kirkhope, Fife, Scotland.
推荐服务器
Baidu Map
百度地图核心API现已全面兼容MCP协议,是国内首家兼容MCP协议的地图服务商。
Playwright MCP Server
一个模型上下文协议服务器,它使大型语言模型能够通过结构化的可访问性快照与网页进行交互,而无需视觉模型或屏幕截图。
Magic Component Platform (MCP)
一个由人工智能驱动的工具,可以从自然语言描述生成现代化的用户界面组件,并与流行的集成开发环境(IDE)集成,从而简化用户界面开发流程。
Audiense Insights MCP Server
通过模型上下文协议启用与 Audiense Insights 账户的交互,从而促进营销洞察和受众数据的提取和分析,包括人口统计信息、行为和影响者互动。
VeyraX
一个单一的 MCP 工具,连接你所有喜爱的工具:Gmail、日历以及其他 40 多个工具。
graphlit-mcp-server
模型上下文协议 (MCP) 服务器实现了 MCP 客户端与 Graphlit 服务之间的集成。 除了网络爬取之外,还可以将任何内容(从 Slack 到 Gmail 再到播客订阅源)导入到 Graphlit 项目中,然后从 MCP 客户端检索相关内容。
Kagi MCP Server
一个 MCP 服务器,集成了 Kagi 搜索功能和 Claude AI,使 Claude 能够在回答需要最新信息的问题时执行实时网络搜索。
e2b-mcp-server
使用 MCP 通过 e2b 运行代码。
Neon MCP Server
用于与 Neon 管理 API 和数据库交互的 MCP 服务器
Exa MCP Server
模型上下文协议(MCP)服务器允许像 Claude 这样的 AI 助手使用 Exa AI 搜索 API 进行网络搜索。这种设置允许 AI 模型以安全和受控的方式获取实时的网络信息。