cloudsealed-mcp

cloudsealed-mcp

MCP server providing deterministic cost anomaly detection for cloud billing and auditable architecture risk scoring, enabling AI agents to identify waste and risk with explainable rules.

Category
访问服务器

README

cloudsealed-mcp

MCP server that gives AI agents (Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, etc.) direct access to three deterministic CloudSealed analysis tools:

  • cloudsealed_analyze_billing_waste — cost anomaly detection over a cloud billing export (AWS/GCP/Azure/generic), using cloudsealed-jit's rolling-median + MAD baseline. Runs locally, no network call.
  • cloudsealed_score_architecture_risk — deterministic, auditable architecture risk scoring (single point of failure, excessive coupling, scalability gap) from a declared system inventory, backed by Predictive-ML-Core.
  • cloudsealed_correlate_cost_and_risk — runs both engines and cross-references them, ranking systems that are both costly and high architecture risk ("double jeopardy"). No cloud-native tool does this: cost anomaly detection and architecture review are separate products even within one cloud, so nothing tells you "this cost spike is on a system that's also a single point of failure." Vendor-neutral, runs on data you already exported.

All tools are read-only: they never write files, and the only network call any of them makes is to the Predictive-ML-Core service you point it at.

License: MIT

<!-- mcp-name: io.github.cloudsealed/cloudsealed-mcp -->


Install

# recommended: no local install, uvx fetches and runs it on demand
uvx cloudsealed-mcp

# or, from source until this is published to PyPI
pip install git+https://github.com/cloudsealed/cloudsealed-mcp

Configure your MCP client

Add to your client's MCP config (.mcp.json for Claude Code, claude_desktop_config.json for Claude Desktop, Cursor's MCP settings, etc.):

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "cloudsealed": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": ["cloudsealed-mcp"]
    }
  }
}

Restart the client, and both tools become available to the agent.

cloudsealed_score_architecture_risk needs a running Predictive-ML-Core

cloudsealed_analyze_billing_waste works out of the box — the analysis engine is a pure Python dependency, no server involved.

cloudsealed_score_architecture_risk calls the Predictive-ML-Core HTTP API. By default it looks for one at http://localhost:8092. Start one with:

docker run -p 8092:8092 cloudsealed/predictive-ml-core

To point at a different deployment (self-hosted or otherwise), set:

export PREDICTIVE_ML_CORE_URL="https://your-deployment"
export PREDICTIVE_ML_CORE_API_KEY="..."   # only if that deployment requires one

Example prompts

  • "Here's our AWS Cost and Usage Report for last month — find the cost anomalies and tell me what to fix first." (paste the CSV; the agent calls cloudsealed_analyze_billing_waste)
  • "We have a checkout-api (CRITICAL, public-facing, no declared auth), an orders-db (CRITICAL), and a third-party payment-gateway. What's our biggest architecture risk?" (the agent calls cloudsealed_score_architecture_risk)
  • "Here's our billing export and our system inventory — which service is both burning money and a reliability risk? Prioritize our cloud work by cost AND risk together." (the agent calls cloudsealed_correlate_cost_and_risk; name systems to match billing service names to get the linked view)

Why deterministic engines, not another LLM call

Both underlying engines score with explicit, auditable rules — not a model. Every anomaly and every risk score traces back to a specific rule and a stated rationale (see JIT's METHODOLOGY.md and Predictive-ML-Core's METHODOLOGY.md). That means an agent calling these tools gets a reproducible, explainable answer instead of a second opinion from another LLM.

FAQ

What's an MCP server, and why not just ask the agent to write the analysis code itself? MCP (Model Context Protocol) lets an agent call a real tool instead of generating code from scratch each time. The underlying engines here are deterministic and already tested/benchmarked — an agent calling them gets a reproducible answer, not a fresh guess with its own bugs.

Which clients support this? Any MCP client: Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, and others that read a standard mcpServers config block.

Is there a hosted version, or do I need to run anything locally? cloudsealed_analyze_billing_waste needs nothing but the uvx invocation. cloudsealed_score_architecture_risk needs a Predictive-ML-Core instance reachable at PREDICTIVE_ML_CORE_URL — self-hosted via Docker by default (see above), or your own deployment.

Does this send my billing data anywhere? No — the billing analysis runs entirely in-process. Only the architecture tool makes a network call, and only to whichever PREDICTIVE_ML_CORE_URL you configure.

Development

pip install -e ".[dev]"
python -m py_compile src/cloudsealed_mcp/server.py

License

MIT. See LICENSE.

推荐服务器

Baidu Map

Baidu Map

百度地图核心API现已全面兼容MCP协议,是国内首家兼容MCP协议的地图服务商。

官方
精选
JavaScript
Playwright MCP Server

Playwright MCP Server

一个模型上下文协议服务器,它使大型语言模型能够通过结构化的可访问性快照与网页进行交互,而无需视觉模型或屏幕截图。

官方
精选
TypeScript
Magic Component Platform (MCP)

Magic Component Platform (MCP)

一个由人工智能驱动的工具,可以从自然语言描述生成现代化的用户界面组件,并与流行的集成开发环境(IDE)集成,从而简化用户界面开发流程。

官方
精选
本地
TypeScript
Audiense Insights MCP Server

Audiense Insights MCP Server

通过模型上下文协议启用与 Audiense Insights 账户的交互,从而促进营销洞察和受众数据的提取和分析,包括人口统计信息、行为和影响者互动。

官方
精选
本地
TypeScript
VeyraX

VeyraX

一个单一的 MCP 工具,连接你所有喜爱的工具:Gmail、日历以及其他 40 多个工具。

官方
精选
本地
graphlit-mcp-server

graphlit-mcp-server

模型上下文协议 (MCP) 服务器实现了 MCP 客户端与 Graphlit 服务之间的集成。 除了网络爬取之外,还可以将任何内容(从 Slack 到 Gmail 再到播客订阅源)导入到 Graphlit 项目中,然后从 MCP 客户端检索相关内容。

官方
精选
TypeScript
Kagi MCP Server

Kagi MCP Server

一个 MCP 服务器,集成了 Kagi 搜索功能和 Claude AI,使 Claude 能够在回答需要最新信息的问题时执行实时网络搜索。

官方
精选
Python
e2b-mcp-server

e2b-mcp-server

使用 MCP 通过 e2b 运行代码。

官方
精选
Neon MCP Server

Neon MCP Server

用于与 Neon 管理 API 和数据库交互的 MCP 服务器

官方
精选
Exa MCP Server

Exa MCP Server

模型上下文协议(MCP)服务器允许像 Claude 这样的 AI 助手使用 Exa AI 搜索 API 进行网络搜索。这种设置允许 AI 模型以安全和受控的方式获取实时的网络信息。

官方
精选