commitment-tracker-mcp
Tracks commitments (promises made in conversations) and provides tools to add, list, mark as fulfilled, and check overdue items.
README
commitment-tracker-mcp
An MCP server that tracks commitments — promises people make in conversation ("I'll send the report by Friday") — so they can be listed, closed out, and flagged when they go overdue.
The repo currently covers Phase 1 (core data model + standalone, reusable MCP server over SQLite) and Phase 2 (the agent orchestrator that does LLM classification, extraction, and drafting, and talks to the server over MCP).
Layout
Phase 1 — storage (MCP server side):
| File | Responsibility |
|---|---|
schema.sql |
The commitments table definition + indexes. |
models.py |
Typed models (Commitment, Status) and UTC time helpers. |
db.py |
SQLite data-access layer. Knows nothing about MCP. |
server.py |
FastMCP server exposing the storage/query tools. |
test_client.py |
Manual end-to-end test that drives the server over stdio. |
Phase 2 — agent (MCP client side):
| File | Responsibility |
|---|---|
llm.py |
All Gemini API calls: flash-lite classification gate, flash extraction/drafting/digest (structured outputs). Includes a StubLLM for offline testing. |
mcp_client.py |
Async client for the commitment-tracker server. The orchestrator's only path to storage. |
orchestrator.py |
Reactive loop: classify → extract → store → draft → confirm. |
digest.py |
Proactive daily job: overdue sweep + due-soon summary + nudge drafts. |
sample_emails.json |
Demo inbox for the orchestrator. |
Setup
pip install -r requirements.txt
Requires Python 3.10+.
Run the server
python server.py # stdio transport, for local/agent use
It creates commitments.db next to the code on first run. Point it elsewhere
with the COMMITMENT_DB_PATH environment variable.
Prove it works
python test_client.py
This spins up the server over stdio against a throwaway database, discovers the
tools, and runs a full lifecycle (add → list → fulfill → overdue), printing
PASS/FAIL for each assertion. It touches your real commitments.db never.
Run the agent (Phase 2)
The live path uses Google Gemini's free tier (no billing). Get a key at
https://aistudio.google.com/apikey, then put it in a .env file:
cp .env.example .env # then edit .env and paste your key
.env is gitignored — the key never gets committed. The entrypoints call
load_dotenv(), so it's picked up automatically:
python orchestrator.py # process sample_emails.json
python digest.py # daily digest + nudge drafts
# Offline — full pipeline & MCP wiring with a deterministic stub LLM (no key):
python orchestrator.py --dry-run
python digest.py --dry-run # digest without the LLM summary
(You can also just export GEMINI_API_KEY=... in your shell instead of .env.)
If a model isn't enabled on your key, override the IDs:
GEMINI_CLASSIFIER_MODEL / GEMINI_EXTRACTOR_MODEL.
The reactive loop per email: classify (Haiku — cheap gate) → extract
commitments (Opus, structured outputs, relative deadlines resolved against an
injected UTC date) → store via the MCP add_commitment tool → draft a
grounded reply → confirm with the user. Nothing is ever auto-sent — every
draft requires explicit approval (--yes exists for demos/CI only).
The digest job is the proactive side, meant for cron/Task Scheduler: it runs
check_overdue, lists what's due this week, and drafts nudges for review.
Model choices: gemini-2.5-flash-lite for classification (runs on every email,
so cheap/fast, thinking disabled), gemini-2.5-flash for extraction, drafting,
and the digest (runs only on emails that pass the gate). All LLM outputs use
structured outputs (Gemini response_schema + pydantic → response.parsed), so
no free-form JSON parsing anywhere. The provider is isolated to llm.py — the
server, MCP client, orchestrator, and digest are provider-agnostic.
Tool surface
The server exposes storage and query tools only:
| Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|
add_commitment(...) |
Record a new, already-structured commitment. |
list_open_commitments(before_date=None) |
List outstanding commitments. |
mark_fulfilled(commitment_id) |
Close a commitment (stamps fulfilled_at). |
check_overdue(as_of=None) |
Flag & return open commitments past their deadline. |
get_commitment(commitment_id) |
Fetch one commitment by id. |
Design boundaries
- Extraction lives in the agent, not the server. Turning raw messages into
structured commitments is an LLM job that lives in
llm.pyon the orchestrator side, which then callsadd_commitmentwith the resolved fields. Keeping the LLM call out of the server keeps this a pure, client-agnostic interop layer that a CLI, a Slack bot, or the agent can all reuse. - The orchestrator never imports
db.py. All storage goes throughmcp_client.pyover stdio — proving the MCP boundary is real, not decorative. - The user confirms every outward action. Drafts (replies, nudges) are always presented for approval; the agent proposes, the human disposes.
- LLM calls are isolated in
llm.py.orchestrator.pytakes any object with the same three methods, so the Phase 4 eval harness can callextract_commitments()directly on a labeled set — andStubLLMruns the whole pipeline offline. db.pyhas no MCP dependency. It is plain functions oversqlite3, so it is directly unit-testable and reusable — the seam that makes the Phase 4 eval harness cheap.
Data-model decisions (Step 2 & Step 7)
- Deadlines stored twice.
deadlineholds the resolved absolute ISO-8601 value (source of truth for queries and overdue logic).deadline_rawkeeps the original phrase ("by Friday") for debugging/eval only. - UTC internally, always. Every timestamp (
created_at,fulfilled_at) and every resolveddeadlineis UTC ISO-8601. Convert to local time only at display. Overdue comparison relies on lexicographic ISO ordering. - NULL deadlines are never overdue. A commitment with no resolvable deadline
is excluded from
check_overdueand frombefore_datefiltering. - Overdue is strict (
deadline < as_of). A date-only deadline becomes overdue the day after it, not on the day itself. - Idempotent inserts. Re-processing the same message won't create
duplicates:
add_commitmentdedups on(source_msg_id, text, who_promised)and returns the existing record. There is intentionally no hard UNIQUE constraint onsource_msg_idalone, because one message can carry several distinct commitments.
Status lifecycle
open ──mark_fulfilled──▶ fulfilled
│
└──check_overdue (deadline passed)──▶ overdue
推荐服务器
Baidu Map
百度地图核心API现已全面兼容MCP协议,是国内首家兼容MCP协议的地图服务商。
Playwright MCP Server
一个模型上下文协议服务器,它使大型语言模型能够通过结构化的可访问性快照与网页进行交互,而无需视觉模型或屏幕截图。
Magic Component Platform (MCP)
一个由人工智能驱动的工具,可以从自然语言描述生成现代化的用户界面组件,并与流行的集成开发环境(IDE)集成,从而简化用户界面开发流程。
Audiense Insights MCP Server
通过模型上下文协议启用与 Audiense Insights 账户的交互,从而促进营销洞察和受众数据的提取和分析,包括人口统计信息、行为和影响者互动。
VeyraX
一个单一的 MCP 工具,连接你所有喜爱的工具:Gmail、日历以及其他 40 多个工具。
graphlit-mcp-server
模型上下文协议 (MCP) 服务器实现了 MCP 客户端与 Graphlit 服务之间的集成。 除了网络爬取之外,还可以将任何内容(从 Slack 到 Gmail 再到播客订阅源)导入到 Graphlit 项目中,然后从 MCP 客户端检索相关内容。
Kagi MCP Server
一个 MCP 服务器,集成了 Kagi 搜索功能和 Claude AI,使 Claude 能够在回答需要最新信息的问题时执行实时网络搜索。
e2b-mcp-server
使用 MCP 通过 e2b 运行代码。
Neon MCP Server
用于与 Neon 管理 API 和数据库交互的 MCP 服务器
Exa MCP Server
模型上下文协议(MCP)服务器允许像 Claude 这样的 AI 助手使用 Exa AI 搜索 API 进行网络搜索。这种设置允许 AI 模型以安全和受控的方式获取实时的网络信息。