compliance-aiops
Converts audit trails from AIops agents into framework-mapped, tamper-evident compliance evidence bundles for HIPAA, PCI-DSS, SOC 2, and GDPR.
README
<!-- mcp-name: io.github.AIops-tools/compliance-aiops -->
Compliance AIops (preview)
Disclaimer: Community-maintained open-source project. Not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by any framework body or GRC vendor. HIPAA, PCI-DSS, SOC 2, GDPR and OSCAL are referenced descriptively; the frameworks and trademarks belong to their owners. MIT licensed.
Governed compliance-evidence tooling for AI-agent infrastructure ops. It
reads the audit trails your governed AIops agents already write — the local
~/.<tool>-aiops/audit.db SQLite trails, all sharing one audit_log schema —
and turns that activity into framework-mapped, hash-chain-sealed compliance
evidence. It never scans your infrastructure and never replaces a GRC
platform: it converts the trails you already produce into auditor-ready,
tamper-evident evidence bundles.
Unlike the other tools in the AIops-tools line it is not a platform wrapper: no external API, no network, no platform credentials. Its only inputs are those on-disk audit databases, read read-only. That also makes it the easiest-to-self-test tool in the line — fully offline and deterministic.
Preview. Evidence, not certification. Fully offline; the source
audit.dbfiles remain the system of record. OSCAL export is a documented v0.2 roadmap item (v0.1 emits JSON + Markdown + CSV shaped to ease a future OSCAL Assessment-Results adapter).
Key features
- Framework mapping with honest evidence-strength — audit events map to
HIPAA §164.312 / PCI-DSS v4.0 / SOC 2 TSC / GDPR controls. Audit trails
prove operating effectiveness strongly but control design / configuration
only partially, and each control is labelled
strongorpartial.gap_analysissays so per control, with the caveat and a remediation hint. - Hash-chain-sealed evidence bundles — SHA-256 over ordered records
(
hash = SHA-256(prev_hash ‖ canonical_json(record)), genesis prev = 64 zeros). ThechainHeadis reproducible for the same (framework, period, sources).verify_bundlecatches tampering;verify_source_chaindetects row-id gaps / deletions in a source trail. An optional HMAC signature seals a bundle under a stored signing key. - Zero-network, read-only — no credentials, no outbound calls, no mutation
of the source trails. Bundles are the only thing written, under
~/.compliance-aiops/bundles/. - Deterministic, test-verified integrity — the integrity claims are
themselves covered by tests: synthetic audit DBs are built through the real
governance-harness
AuditEngine, a golden reproduciblechainHeadis asserted, and tamper tests confirm detection. No live infrastructure needed.
Tools (15 MCP tools)
Read / analysis (12)
| Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|
list_audit_sources |
Discovered sibling audit DBs (path, tool, readable, row count) |
query_audit_events |
Cross-tool event query — filter by tool/skill/status/risk/approved/selector/since/until |
activity_timeline |
Event counts bucketed by hour or day |
list_frameworks |
Supported frameworks + control counts |
coverage_summary |
Per-control covered/weak/uncovered for ONE framework |
control_evidence |
Evidence rows + population + a reproducible query for ONE control |
gap_analysis |
Controls with no/weak evidence + honest caveat + remediation |
approval_report |
High-risk write ops + who approved + rationale (the CC8.1 / PCI 7-8 / HIPAA §312(a) artifact) |
exceptions_report |
Denied / error / budget_exceeded ops — enforcement + anomaly evidence |
verify_source_chain |
Chain head + row-id gap detection for one source |
verify_bundle |
Verify a sealed bundle: chain + seal head + optional signature |
list_bundles |
Bundles under ~/.compliance-aiops/bundles/ |
Write / artifact (3 — no external mutation)
| Tool | Risk | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
generate_evidence_bundle |
low | One call: coverage + approval trail + exceptions + sealed records → a bundle .json |
export_bundle |
low | Render a bundle to markdown / csv / json |
sign_bundle |
medium | HMAC over the seal using the stored signing key |
The CLI exposes a convenience subset; the full 15-tool surface is available over MCP.
Frameworks & controls
| Framework | Sample controls (strength) |
|---|---|
| HIPAA (§164.312) | 164.312(b) Audit controls (strong), 164.312(a)(1) Access control (strong), 164.312(c)(1) Integrity (strong) |
| PCI-DSS v4.0 | 10.2 Audit log content (strong), 10.3 Protect audit logs (strong), 7-8 Least privilege / authn (partial) |
| SOC 2 TSC | CC6.1 Logical access (strong), CC7.2 Monitoring (strong), CC8.1 Change management (strong) |
| GDPR | Art.30 Records of processing (partial), Art.32 Security of processing (strong) |
Install
uv tool install compliance-aiops # or: pipx install compliance-aiops
Quick start
compliance-aiops init # discover sibling ~/.*-aiops/audit.db, set org name, optional signing key
compliance-aiops doctor # which sibling audit DBs are present/readable
compliance-aiops overview # audit sources + per-framework covered/total
compliance-aiops report coverage soc2 # per-control SOC 2 coverage
compliance-aiops bundle generate soc2 # sealed evidence bundle → ~/.compliance-aiops/bundles/
compliance-aiops bundle verify <path> # re-verify the chain + seal (+ signature)
Run as an MCP server (stdio):
export COMPLIANCE_AIOPS_MASTER_PASSWORD=... # only needed to unlock a signing key
compliance-aiops mcp # or: compliance-aiops-mcp
Integrity & honest limits
- Tamper-EVIDENT, not tamper-PROOF. The hash chain and optional signature
let an auditor detect alteration; they do not prevent it. The source
audit.dbfiles remain the system of record — record thechainHeadout-of-band if you need an independent anchor. - Operating effectiveness vs. design. An audit trail strongly evidences that
a control ran (samples, approvals, denials) but only partially evidences that
a control is designed / configured correctly (e.g. MFA required,
least-privilege roles). Every control carries a
strong/partiallabel andgap_analysissurfaces the caveat rather than overclaiming.
Supported scope & limitations (preview)
- Evidence, not certification. This produces auditor-ready evidence bundles; it does not issue attestations, opinions, or certifications.
- In scope: the four frameworks above, over the
audit_logtrails written by governed AIops tools discovered via~/.*-aiops/audit.db. - Not in scope: it does not scan infrastructure, connect to any platform, or replace a GRC platform. For platform operations use the other AIops-tools.
- OSCAL export is v0.2. v0.1 emits JSON + Markdown + CSV.
- Preview: interfaces may change before v1.0.
Missing a capability?
Want another framework, control mapping, export format (OSCAL, CSV shape), or a verification you don't see here? Open an issue or a PR — contributions welcome.
推荐服务器
Baidu Map
百度地图核心API现已全面兼容MCP协议,是国内首家兼容MCP协议的地图服务商。
Playwright MCP Server
一个模型上下文协议服务器,它使大型语言模型能够通过结构化的可访问性快照与网页进行交互,而无需视觉模型或屏幕截图。
Magic Component Platform (MCP)
一个由人工智能驱动的工具,可以从自然语言描述生成现代化的用户界面组件,并与流行的集成开发环境(IDE)集成,从而简化用户界面开发流程。
Audiense Insights MCP Server
通过模型上下文协议启用与 Audiense Insights 账户的交互,从而促进营销洞察和受众数据的提取和分析,包括人口统计信息、行为和影响者互动。
VeyraX
一个单一的 MCP 工具,连接你所有喜爱的工具:Gmail、日历以及其他 40 多个工具。
graphlit-mcp-server
模型上下文协议 (MCP) 服务器实现了 MCP 客户端与 Graphlit 服务之间的集成。 除了网络爬取之外,还可以将任何内容(从 Slack 到 Gmail 再到播客订阅源)导入到 Graphlit 项目中,然后从 MCP 客户端检索相关内容。
Kagi MCP Server
一个 MCP 服务器,集成了 Kagi 搜索功能和 Claude AI,使 Claude 能够在回答需要最新信息的问题时执行实时网络搜索。
e2b-mcp-server
使用 MCP 通过 e2b 运行代码。
Neon MCP Server
用于与 Neon 管理 API 和数据库交互的 MCP 服务器
Exa MCP Server
模型上下文协议(MCP)服务器允许像 Claude 这样的 AI 助手使用 Exa AI 搜索 API 进行网络搜索。这种设置允许 AI 模型以安全和受控的方式获取实时的网络信息。