datadiffer
Enables AI agents to compare database tables using read-only tools, with credentials managed locally and never exposed to the model.
README
<!-- mcp-name: io.github.gauthierpiarrette/datadiffer -->
datadiffer
Diff two tables. See what changed, and which slice of your data it's concentrated in.
98.6% of modified rows have country = 'DE' (8.87x over-represented)
datadiffer compares two tables (dev vs. prod, PR vs. main, source vs.
destination) and tells you what changed and where it's concentrated: rows
added / removed / modified, per-column change rates, and segment attribution.
Built for the era when agents write your pipelines and someone has to check their work. A maintained, MIT-licensed successor to the archived data-diff.
Try it in 60 seconds
No credentials, no config, no account. It generates its own data:
uvx datadiffer demo

datadiffer-demo/orders_prod.parquet vs datadiffer-demo/orders_dev.parquet
key: order_id (inferred from *_id naming)
rows: +800 added -250 removed ~432 modified 49318 unchanged
┏━━━━━━━┳━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┳━━━━━━━━━━━━━┓
┃column ┃ changed rows ┃ % of matched┃
┡━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━━━━━━┩
│amount │ 432 │ 0.87%│
└───────┴──────────────┴─────────────┘
-> 98.6% of modified rows have country = 'DE' (8.87x over-represented)
93.2% of added rows have plan = NULL (63.19x over-represented)
sample changes:
[order_id=0] amount: 5.0 -> 7.1
[order_id=1] amount: 6.37 -> 6.38
[order_id=117] amount: 32.4 -> 34.5
[order_id=234] amount: 59.8 -> 61.9
[order_id=351] amount: 87.2 -> 89.3
DIFF FOUND
That last block is the point. A diff tells you 432 rows changed; datadiffer tells you they're almost all German orders, which is the difference between "something moved" and "the VAT change landed."
Install
pip install datadiffer # local files: Parquet, CSV, DuckDB
pip install 'datadiffer[snowflake]' # + Snowflake
pip install 'datadiffer[postgres]' # + Postgres
pip install 'datadiffer[mcp]' # + MCP server for AI agents
Use it
# local files
datadiffer diff prod.parquet dev.parquet
# DuckDB
datadiffer diff prod.duckdb:orders dev.duckdb:orders
# Postgres (attached read-only)
datadiffer diff orders orders_v2 --source "postgresql://user@host:5432/db"
# Snowflake, or anything in datadiffer.toml (run `datadiffer init` first)
datadiffer diff wh::analytics.orders wh::analytics_dev.orders
# cross-source: warehouse vs. a local file
datadiffer diff wh::orders orders_snapshot.parquet
# machine-readable, for scripts and CI
datadiffer diff a.parquet b.parquet --format json
Exit codes follow the GNU diff convention: 0 no differences, 1 differences found, 2 operational error.
Useful flags: --key (inferred when omitted), --where, --columns /
--exclude-columns, --sample-limit, --no-attribution, -q.
In your pull requests
datadiffer-action posts the report as a sticky PR comment:
datadiffer:
ANALYTICS.ORDERSvsANALYTICS_PR_482.ORDERS: differences found ❌+800 added · −250 removed · ~432 modified · 49,318 unchanged (2.96% of base rows affected) Policy: max-changed-rows-pct exceeded: 2.96% > 0.5%
Column Changed rows % of matched amount432 0.87% Where it's concentrated: 98.6% of modified rows have
country = 'DE'(8.87× over-represented) 93.2% of added rows haveplan = NULL(63.19× over-represented)
- uses: gauthierpiarrette/datadiffer-action@v1
with:
config: datadiffer.toml # holds the warehouse connection
table-a: wh::ANALYTICS.ORDERS
schema-map: "ANALYTICS=ANALYTICS_PR_${PR_NUMBER}"
max-changed-rows-pct: "0.5"
env:
SNOWFLAKE_PRIVATE_KEY: ${{ secrets.SNOWFLAKE_PRIVATE_KEY }}
Running dbt? docs/dbt-ci.md turns dbt ls --select state:modified into one diff per changed model, each with its own comment.
For AI agents (MCP)
Let a coding agent verify its own data changes:
datadiffer init # scaffold datadiffer.toml, then add the server to your client
{ "mcpServers": { "datadiffer": { "command": "datadiffer", "args": ["mcp"] } } }
Any MCP client works. datadiffer init prints the server entry to paste,
including a uvx form for clients that prefer no global install.
Four read-only tools: list_connections, schema_diff, diff_summary
(cheap preflight), diff_tables (full report). Credentials never pass
through the model. Tools take connection names from your local
datadiffer.toml, never DSNs. Over-cap requests come back as structured
refusals with a remedy, so the agent can self-correct instead of failing.
What makes it different
Most diff tools answer whether two tables match. datadiffer answers what changed and where: which columns moved, and which slice of the data the change is concentrated in.
| Tool | Use it instead when |
|---|---|
| Datafold | You need billion-row cross-database reconciliation, a collaboration UI, lineage/impact analysis, and a support contract. |
SQLMesh table_diff |
You already run SQLMesh and diff within a single gateway (cross-database diffing is a Tobiko Cloud feature). |
| Recce | You want a dbt-native PR review UI and your whole workflow is dbt. |
| Google DVT | You're validating a migration across 17 warehouse types and want pass/fail validation with YAML configs. |
| datacompy | You're comparing two pandas/Spark/Polars DataFrames inside one process. |
datadiffer is for the case in between: one command, no platform, works from your terminal, your CI, or your agent, and it explains itself.
Migrating from data-diff / reladiff
Same job, different flags:
| data-diff / reladiff | datadiffer |
|---|---|
data-diff DB1 table1 DB2 table2 |
datadiffer diff <a> <b> (locators or --source/--target) |
-k, --key-columns |
--key (repeatable, or comma-separated) |
-c, --columns |
--columns |
-w, --where |
--where (validated: single boolean expression, no subqueries) |
--json |
--format json (stable schema v1) |
-l, --limit |
--sample-limit |
Differences worth knowing: keys are inferred from declared constraints or
*_id conventions when you omit --key; unknown column names in filters are
an error, never silently ignored; and exit code 1 means "diff found"
(2 is reserved for operational errors), so CI can tell them apart.
Not yet ported: checksum-bisection hashdiff for very large cross-database diffs, which is reladiff's headline capability, plus MySQL, Oracle, ClickHouse, Trino and the rest of its connector list. If you need those today, use reladiff; the bisection port is the top item on our v0.2 roadmap and will credit its author.
Full command mapping and behavior differences: docs/migrating-from-data-diff.md.
Scope and limits (v0.1)
- Warehouses: Snowflake, Postgres, DuckDB, Parquet, CSV. BigQuery is next (v0.1.1).
- Every diff runs in local DuckDB. Postgres is attached read-only and
scanned in place; Snowflake is pulled once over Arrow with only the needed
columns. Both are capped at 50M rows and 10 GiB per side, so narrow the
comparison with
--where. Pushing the comparison into the warehouse, and lifting that cap with checksum bisection, are the next two pieces of work. - Postgres reads are unsnapshotted (the report says so in
execution.snapshot); Snowflake pulls are a single consistent SELECT. - Segment attribution is single-column, categorical, and descriptive. It says "over-represented", never causal.
Project
MIT, no CLA, no telemetry. The report schema is frozen at v1 and contract-tested, so pipelines and agents that parse it keep working across releases. Dependencies are deliberately few: DuckDB, PyArrow, sqlglot, click, rich.
What's next
BigQuery, then checksum-bisection hashdiff so large cross-database diffs stop needing a row cap (ported with credit to reladiff), then more connectors. Tracked in issues. Comment on the one you need and it moves up.
Contributing
git clone https://github.com/gauthierpiarrette/datadiffer && cd datadiffer
uv sync --group dev
uv run pytest -q # warehouse tests skip unless credentials are set
uv run ruff check .
Prior art gratefully acknowledged: data-diff and reladiff (Erez Shinan), whose checksum-bisection design v0.2 will port; Adtributor (Microsoft Research) for the attribution scoring; and DuckDB, which makes all of this fast enough to be boring.
License
MIT
推荐服务器
Baidu Map
百度地图核心API现已全面兼容MCP协议,是国内首家兼容MCP协议的地图服务商。
Playwright MCP Server
一个模型上下文协议服务器,它使大型语言模型能够通过结构化的可访问性快照与网页进行交互,而无需视觉模型或屏幕截图。
Magic Component Platform (MCP)
一个由人工智能驱动的工具,可以从自然语言描述生成现代化的用户界面组件,并与流行的集成开发环境(IDE)集成,从而简化用户界面开发流程。
Audiense Insights MCP Server
通过模型上下文协议启用与 Audiense Insights 账户的交互,从而促进营销洞察和受众数据的提取和分析,包括人口统计信息、行为和影响者互动。
VeyraX
一个单一的 MCP 工具,连接你所有喜爱的工具:Gmail、日历以及其他 40 多个工具。
graphlit-mcp-server
模型上下文协议 (MCP) 服务器实现了 MCP 客户端与 Graphlit 服务之间的集成。 除了网络爬取之外,还可以将任何内容(从 Slack 到 Gmail 再到播客订阅源)导入到 Graphlit 项目中,然后从 MCP 客户端检索相关内容。
Kagi MCP Server
一个 MCP 服务器,集成了 Kagi 搜索功能和 Claude AI,使 Claude 能够在回答需要最新信息的问题时执行实时网络搜索。
e2b-mcp-server
使用 MCP 通过 e2b 运行代码。
Neon MCP Server
用于与 Neon 管理 API 和数据库交互的 MCP 服务器
Exa MCP Server
模型上下文协议(MCP)服务器允许像 Claude 这样的 AI 助手使用 Exa AI 搜索 API 进行网络搜索。这种设置允许 AI 模型以安全和受控的方式获取实时的网络信息。