Design-Code Registry MCP
Maps design components, tokens, and patterns to their code implementations, providing AI coding agents with exact-match resolution across any design tool and framework. Enables agents to reliably discover and reuse existing components across React, Vue, Flutter, SwiftUI, and more.
README
Design-Code Registry MCP
A deterministic, project-agnostic MCP server that maps design components, tokens, and patterns to their code implementations — across any design tool and any framework.
It's a lightweight, git-friendly alternative to Figma Code Connect, built as a generic knowledge layer that any MCP-compatible AI coding agent (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, OpenCode, ...) can query.
Figma Design ↕ Design Component / Token / Pattern ↕ Code Implementation
Why this exists
AI coding agents are good at writing code but bad at knowing "does this project already have a Button component, and if so, what's it called and where does it live?" Today that knowledge either lives in an agent's fuzzy inference (unreliable) or is coupled tightly to one specific design tool + framework pairing (Figma Code Connect, which is React/Figma-only).
Core principle: exact registry data beats AI inference. If the registry has an explicit mapping, the agent should never need to guess it. If it doesn't, the agent should be told "unresolved" rather than making something up.
This project is:
- Not an AI model. It's a structured knowledge layer exposed through MCP tools.
- Not a vector database / RAG. Resolution is exact-match only (id, design reference, canonical name, alias) — never embeddings or fuzzy similarity.
- Not tied to any framework or design tool. React, Vue, Svelte, SwiftUI, Flutter, HTML — and Figma, Sketch, Penpot, or anything else — are all just strings in the schema, not special cases in the code.
Architecture
AI Agent (Claude Code, Cursor, ...)
│
↓
MCP Protocol (stdio)
│
↓
Design-Code Registry MCP (this package — the generic engine)
│
FileRegistryProvider
│
┌──────────────┼──────────────┬─────────────┐
↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
components.json tokens.json patterns.json rules.json
│
.design/registry/ (your project — the data)
The server (this npm package) is generic and reusable across completely different projects. The registry
(.design/registry/ in your project) is where all project-specific facts live, as plain JSON files that are
readable, diffable, and mergeable in git.
Registry concepts
| Concept | File | What it captures |
|---|---|---|
| Manifest | manifest.json |
Schema version, project info, primary design tool. |
| Component | components.json |
A design component (e.g. Button) → one or more code implementations, across languages/frameworks. |
| Token | tokens.json |
A design token (color, spacing, typography, ...) with a stable id and value. |
| Pattern | patterns.json |
A higher-level composition of components (e.g. "empty state" = message + Button). |
| Rules | rules.json |
Structured project decisions an agent must respect (e.g. "reuse Button, don't create a new one"). |
A single component can have multiple implementations — the same design concept mapped to React, Vue, SwiftUI, and Flutter simultaneously, if your project needs that:
{
"id": "button",
"name": "Button",
"implementations": [
{ "language": "typescript", "framework": "react", "component": "Button", "sourcePath": "src/components/Button.tsx" },
{ "language": "dart", "framework": "flutter", "component": "AppButton", "sourcePath": "lib/widgets/app_button.dart" }
]
}
Design references are generic too — tool is an open string, not an enum, so adding support for a new design
tool never requires a schema migration:
{ "tool": "figma", "fileId": "abc123", "nodeId": "12:340", "url": "https://figma.com/file/abc123?node-id=12-340" }
See src/schema/ for the full, commented schema (Zod), and
examples/fictional-project/ for a complete worked example.
Deterministic resolution
registry_find_by_design_reference and the underlying resolver never guess. They try, in this fixed order, and
stop at the first strategy that produces a match:
- Exact design reference (tool + node/file/url/name)
- Exact registry id
- Exact canonical name
- Explicit alias
- Otherwise:
unresolved
If a strategy matches more than one component, resolution stops there and reports ambiguous with every
candidate — it never silently picks one:
// unresolved
{ "status": "unresolved" }
// ambiguous
{ "status": "ambiguous", "strategy": "alias", "candidates": [ /* ... */ ] }
// resolved
{ "status": "resolved", "strategy": "design-reference", "component": { "id": "button", /* ... */ } }
MCP tools
Read
| Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|
registry_get_manifest |
Get registry metadata (schema version, project, design tool). |
registry_list_components |
List components, optionally filtered by status/tag. |
registry_get_component |
Fetch one component by exact id. |
registry_find_component |
Deterministic substring search across id/name/aliases/tags. |
registry_find_by_design_reference |
Resolve a design-tool reference to a component (see above). |
registry_list_tokens |
List tokens, optionally filtered by category. |
registry_get_token |
Fetch one token by exact id. |
registry_list_patterns |
List UI patterns. |
registry_get_pattern |
Fetch one pattern by exact id. |
registry_get_rules |
Get the full structured rules document. |
registry_validate |
Run full registry validation (see below). |
Write
| Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|
registry_init |
Create a new starter registry. Fails if one exists (unless force). |
registry_create_component |
Create a component. Fails on duplicate id. |
registry_update_component |
Patch an existing component. Fails if the id doesn't exist. |
registry_deprecate_component |
Mark a component deprecated (no destructive delete exists). |
registry_create_token / registry_update_token |
Same create/update contract, for tokens. |
registry_create_pattern / registry_update_pattern |
Same create/update contract, for patterns. |
registry_update_rules |
Replace the full rules document (send the complete desired list). |
Mutation safety: creating an id that already exists is an error (use update instead); updating an id that
doesn't exist is an error (use create instead); there is no destructive delete for components — use
registry_deprecate_component so history survives in git.
Validation
registry_validate (and design-code-registry validate in the CLI) checks the whole registry for:
- Duplicate ids within components/tokens/patterns/rules
- Duplicate design references (two components claiming the same Figma node)
- Broken references (a pattern pointing at a component that doesn't exist, a deprecation
replacedBypointing nowhere, a rule'sappliesTo.idpointing nowhere) - Circular pattern references (pattern A → related pattern B → related pattern A)
- Missing implementations on approved components (warning, not an error)
{
"valid": false,
"errorCount": 1,
"warningCount": 0,
"issues": [
{ "severity": "error", "code": "BROKEN_REFERENCE", "message": "Pattern \"empty-state\" references component \"buton\", which does not exist.", "location": "pattern:empty-state" }
]
}
CLI
Human-facing interface over the same RegistryService the MCP tools use — behavior never drifts between the two.
npx design-code-registry-mcp init --name "My Project" --design-tool figma
design-code-registry validate
design-code-registry list components --status approved
design-code-registry list tokens --category color
design-code-registry list patterns
design-code-registry add component --id button --name Button
design-code-registry add token --id color-primary --name "Primary" --category color --value "#3B5BFF"
design-code-registry add pattern --id empty-state --name "Empty State" --components button
Every command accepts -p, --path <path> to point at a specific registry, or reads DESIGN_REGISTRY_PATH.
Installation
npm install -g design-code-registry-mcp
# or, without installing:
npx design-code-registry-mcp init
# or install locally:
npm run build
claude mcp add --scope project design-registry -- node /ABSOLUTE/PATH/TO/design-code-registry-mcp/dist/index.js
Claude Code setup
Add the server to your Claude Code MCP configuration (.mcp.json at your project root, or via
claude mcp add):
{
"mcpServers": {
"design-code-registry": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "design-code-registry-mcp"]
}
}
}
Or, with an explicit registry path (useful in a monorepo):
{
"mcpServers": {
"design-code-registry": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "design-code-registry-mcp", "--registry-path=./packages/design-system/.design/registry"]
}
}
}
The server works with any MCP-compatible client over stdio — Claude Code is one client among several, not a dependency of the server itself.
Figma MCP integration
This server does not talk to the Figma API or inspect Figma files — that's Figma's own MCP server's job. The two are designed to be complementary:
Figma MCP → design context (fileKey, nodeId, ...) → Design-Code Registry MCP → explicit mapping → AI agent → code
A typical agent workflow:
- Agent asks Figma MCP for the selected node's
fileKey/nodeId. - Agent calls
registry_find_by_design_referenceon this server with those identifiers. - If
resolved, the agent reuses the returned implementation. Ifunresolved, the agent may propose a new component (per your project's rules) and register it withregistry_create_component.
Multi-framework example
A single registry can describe implementations across totally different codebases:
Button (design concept)
├── React → src/components/Button.tsx
├── Vue → src/components/Button.vue
├── SwiftUI → Sources/Button.swift
└── Flutter → lib/widgets/app_button.dart
Nothing about the server changes based on which of these your project uses — the schema treats language and
framework as open strings.
Example project
examples/fictional-project/ contains a complete, validated example registry
(Button, Input, Card, Modal, two patterns, seven tokens, five rules) for a fictional "Aurora Design System." Copy
.design/registry/ from there as a starting point, or run:
cp -r examples/fictional-project/.design .
AI agent usage contract
Agents connected to this server should:
- Query the registry before creating any reusable UI component.
- Resolve exact mappings first — never guess a mapping when one might exist.
- Reuse existing registered implementations rather than duplicating them.
- Read relevant tokens and patterns before generating styles/layout.
- Report
unresolvedhonestly rather than inventing a mapping. - Never create a new canonical component when
registry_find_component/registry_find_by_design_referenceshows an equivalent one already exists. - Only propose a new component when no appropriate existing one exists.
- Treat all registry mutations as explicit, deliberate actions — not incidental side effects.
- Treat the registry as authoritative for project-specific Design ↔ Code facts.
At the same time, the registry doesn't own good engineering judgment: when it's incomplete or a more maintainable approach is clearly available, an agent should say so — distinguishing verified registry facts from inferred information and recommendations — rather than mechanically obeying an incomplete registry.
Development
npm install
npm run build # compile TypeScript → dist/
npm test # build + run the full vitest suite (56 tests, including a real stdio subprocess e2e test)
npm run lint
npm run typecheck
See CONTRIBUTING.md for the project's design principles before opening a PR.
Limitations & future improvements
- Only a local, file-based registry provider ships today. The
RegistryServicelayer is provider-agnostic, so a remote/API-backed provider is possible without touching MCP tool logic — just not implemented yet. - No optional HTTP/SSE transport yet (stdio only), per the "don't over-engineer the first version" principle.
registry_find_componentis a deterministic substring search, not a ranked/fuzzy search — by design, but it means very loose queries may return nothing where a human would expect a near-match.- No built-in Figma/Sketch/Penpot API client — this server intentionally stays downstream of tools like Figma MCP rather than duplicating their job.
License
推荐服务器
Baidu Map
百度地图核心API现已全面兼容MCP协议,是国内首家兼容MCP协议的地图服务商。
Playwright MCP Server
一个模型上下文协议服务器,它使大型语言模型能够通过结构化的可访问性快照与网页进行交互,而无需视觉模型或屏幕截图。
Magic Component Platform (MCP)
一个由人工智能驱动的工具,可以从自然语言描述生成现代化的用户界面组件,并与流行的集成开发环境(IDE)集成,从而简化用户界面开发流程。
Audiense Insights MCP Server
通过模型上下文协议启用与 Audiense Insights 账户的交互,从而促进营销洞察和受众数据的提取和分析,包括人口统计信息、行为和影响者互动。
VeyraX
一个单一的 MCP 工具,连接你所有喜爱的工具:Gmail、日历以及其他 40 多个工具。
graphlit-mcp-server
模型上下文协议 (MCP) 服务器实现了 MCP 客户端与 Graphlit 服务之间的集成。 除了网络爬取之外,还可以将任何内容(从 Slack 到 Gmail 再到播客订阅源)导入到 Graphlit 项目中,然后从 MCP 客户端检索相关内容。
Kagi MCP Server
一个 MCP 服务器,集成了 Kagi 搜索功能和 Claude AI,使 Claude 能够在回答需要最新信息的问题时执行实时网络搜索。
e2b-mcp-server
使用 MCP 通过 e2b 运行代码。
Neon MCP Server
用于与 Neon 管理 API 和数据库交互的 MCP 服务器
Exa MCP Server
模型上下文协议(MCP)服务器允许像 Claude 这样的 AI 助手使用 Exa AI 搜索 API 进行网络搜索。这种设置允许 AI 模型以安全和受控的方式获取实时的网络信息。