edgar-mcp

edgar-mcp

An MCP server that enables models to access SEC EDGAR filings, filing text, and XBRL financial facts with caching, rate limiting, and iXBRL stripping.

Category
访问服务器

README

edgar-mcp

An MCP server that gives a model working access to SEC EDGAR — company filings, filing text, and XBRL financial facts.

CI Python 3.11+ runtime deps

Verification launch kit

Inspect Published evidence
Strongest result Warm 10-K reads reach 1.1 ms / 0.00 MB, measured at 138x the cold fetch
Verification Wire-level request windows, transferred-byte counters, offline fixtures, and burst tests
Failure boundary Public EDGAR data only; not an investment recommendation or a complete accounting model
Reproduce make test && make bench
Interactive replay Replay the burst and false cache hit

Evidence contract: a class named RateLimiter or Cache proves nothing by itself. The benchmark measures grants inside a real one-second window and bytes transferred on the wire.

Interactive results page — fire a burst of tool calls and watch a full token bucket sail through the limit it was written to enforce, then see what each EDGAR host can actually validate.

EDGAR will happily hand you a 9 MB filing and then throttle you for asking twice. The interesting part of this server is everything between the model and the wire.

What is actually implemented

  • ticker, CIK, or company name resolves to an EDGAR identity, with ambiguous names returning candidates instead of a silent wrong guess;
  • filing history spans EDGAR's overflow files, so companies past ~1000 filings don't get silently truncated to the recent page;
  • filing text arrives windowed with a next_offset cursor — a 10-K is ~206K characters and does not belong in a context window whole;
  • inline-XBRL scaffolding is stripped, so extracted text starts at the prose and not at 11K characters of false2025FY0000320193...;
  • XBRL concepts come back as a time series, with a tag-discovery tool because nobody knows the right us-gaap tag name off the top of their head;
  • one metric can be ranked across every filer for a period via the frames API;
  • full-text search covers filings from 2001 onward;
  • requests are paced under SEC's 10 req/s ceiling even when a model fires a parallel burst of tool calls;
  • responses are cached per-host by the freshness rule that host actually supports.
flowchart LR
  M["model tool call"] --> R["resolve ticker / CIK / name"]
  R --> C{"cached?"}
  C -->|"Archives: immutable"| D["disk, no network"]
  C -->|"data.sec.gov: TTL fresh"| D
  C -->|"stale or absent"| P["pacer @ 9 req/s"]
  P --> E["EDGAR"]
  E -->|"429 / 5xx"| P
  E --> W["cache write"]
  W --> X["iXBRL strip + window"]
  D --> X
  X --> M

Measured, not implied

Apple M-series, macOS, Python 3.13, live EDGAR. Reproduce with make bench.

Check Result
Tests passing 32
companyfacts cold fetch 3.75 MB / 97 ms
companyfacts warm read 0.00 MB / 1.4 ms (68×)
10-K document cold fetch 1.52 MB / 154 ms
10-K document warm read 0.00 MB / 1.1 ms (138×)
submissions warm read 0.00 MB / 0.2 ms (755×)
Sustained request rate 9.2 req/s
Peak requests in any 1s window 10 (SEC ceiling: 10)
iXBRL scaffolding removed from a 10-K 11,303 chars
Text extraction throughput 23.4 MB/s
Windows to read a full 10-K @ 40K 6

Both the cache and pacer numbers above are post-fix. The first benchmark run reported a 3.75 MB "cache hit" that was really a full re-download, and 19 requests inside a one-second window against a 10 req/s limit. See DESIGN.md.

Where it loses

  • Freshness on data.sec.gov is a guess. That host sends no ETag and no Last-Modified, so conditional requests are impossible and freshness falls back to a 1-hour TTL. A filing that lands mid-TTL is invisible until it expires. Pass ttl=0 if you need read-your-writes.
  • Windowing re-reads, it doesn't range-read. EDGAR honors HTTP Range on Archives (verified: 206, accept-ranges: bytes), but partial HTML can't be parsed reliably, so the whole document is fetched once and windowed from cache. The first call on a large filing pays the full download.
  • Search is never cached. Results are query-shaped and EDGAR's full-text endpoint offers no validators, so every search is a live round trip against the 9 req/s budget.
  • The pacer is global. Ten companies queried in parallel serialize at ~9 req/s. Correct, but not fast.
  • XBRL values are consolidated totals. Dimensional breakdowns (by segment, by geography) exist in the data and this does not surface them.
  • Full-text search starts at 2001. Older filings are reachable through list_filings, not search_filings.

Verify it

make test    # 32 tests, no network
make bench   # live EDGAR, prints the table above

Setup

SEC requires a User-Agent carrying a real contact address and blocks requests without one. The server refuses to start rather than letting you discover that as a confusing 403 later.

export EDGAR_USER_AGENT="your-project you@example.com"

Build and run the local container over stdio:

docker build -t edgar-mcp:local .
docker run --rm -i \
  -e EDGAR_USER_AGENT="your-project you@example.com" \
  edgar-mcp:local

The image runs as an unprivileged user and writes its EDGAR cache under that user's home directory. Mount /home/edgar/.cache/edgar-mcp if the cache should survive container restarts.

Add to claude_desktop_config.json or .mcp.json:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "edgar": {
      "command": "uv",
      "args": ["run", "--directory", "/path/to/edgar-mcp", "edgar-mcp"],
      "env": { "EDGAR_USER_AGENT": "your-project you@example.com" }
    }
  }
}

Tools

Tool Purpose
lookup_company ticker / CIK / name → EDGAR identity
list_filings filing history, filtered by form and date
get_filing_text windowed document text, follow next_offset
list_concepts which XBRL tags a company actually reports
get_concept time series for one tag
compare_concept one tag ranked across all filers for a period
search_filings full-text search, 2001→
cache_stats hit rate, requests, bytes downloaded

A typical chain is lookup_companylist_filingsget_filing_text, or list_conceptsget_concept when you want numbers rather than prose.

License

MIT

推荐服务器

Baidu Map

Baidu Map

百度地图核心API现已全面兼容MCP协议,是国内首家兼容MCP协议的地图服务商。

官方
精选
JavaScript
Playwright MCP Server

Playwright MCP Server

一个模型上下文协议服务器,它使大型语言模型能够通过结构化的可访问性快照与网页进行交互,而无需视觉模型或屏幕截图。

官方
精选
TypeScript
Audiense Insights MCP Server

Audiense Insights MCP Server

通过模型上下文协议启用与 Audiense Insights 账户的交互,从而促进营销洞察和受众数据的提取和分析,包括人口统计信息、行为和影响者互动。

官方
精选
本地
TypeScript
Magic Component Platform (MCP)

Magic Component Platform (MCP)

一个由人工智能驱动的工具,可以从自然语言描述生成现代化的用户界面组件,并与流行的集成开发环境(IDE)集成,从而简化用户界面开发流程。

官方
精选
本地
TypeScript
VeyraX

VeyraX

一个单一的 MCP 工具,连接你所有喜爱的工具:Gmail、日历以及其他 40 多个工具。

官方
精选
本地
Kagi MCP Server

Kagi MCP Server

一个 MCP 服务器,集成了 Kagi 搜索功能和 Claude AI,使 Claude 能够在回答需要最新信息的问题时执行实时网络搜索。

官方
精选
Python
graphlit-mcp-server

graphlit-mcp-server

模型上下文协议 (MCP) 服务器实现了 MCP 客户端与 Graphlit 服务之间的集成。 除了网络爬取之外,还可以将任何内容(从 Slack 到 Gmail 再到播客订阅源)导入到 Graphlit 项目中,然后从 MCP 客户端检索相关内容。

官方
精选
TypeScript
Exa MCP Server

Exa MCP Server

模型上下文协议(MCP)服务器允许像 Claude 这样的 AI 助手使用 Exa AI 搜索 API 进行网络搜索。这种设置允许 AI 模型以安全和受控的方式获取实时的网络信息。

官方
精选
mcp-server-qdrant

mcp-server-qdrant

这个仓库展示了如何为向量搜索引擎 Qdrant 创建一个 MCP (Managed Control Plane) 服务器的示例。

官方
精选
e2b-mcp-server

e2b-mcp-server

使用 MCP 通过 e2b 运行代码。

官方
精选