edgar-mcp
An MCP server that enables models to access SEC EDGAR filings, filing text, and XBRL financial facts with caching, rate limiting, and iXBRL stripping.
README
edgar-mcp
An MCP server that gives a model working access to SEC EDGAR — company filings, filing text, and XBRL financial facts.
Verification launch kit
| Inspect | Published evidence |
|---|---|
| Strongest result | Warm 10-K reads reach 1.1 ms / 0.00 MB, measured at 138x the cold fetch |
| Verification | Wire-level request windows, transferred-byte counters, offline fixtures, and burst tests |
| Failure boundary | Public EDGAR data only; not an investment recommendation or a complete accounting model |
| Reproduce | make test && make bench |
| Interactive replay | Replay the burst and false cache hit |
Evidence contract: a class named
RateLimiterorCacheproves nothing by itself. The benchmark measures grants inside a real one-second window and bytes transferred on the wire.
→ Interactive results page — fire a burst of tool calls and watch a full token bucket sail through the limit it was written to enforce, then see what each EDGAR host can actually validate.
EDGAR will happily hand you a 9 MB filing and then throttle you for asking twice. The interesting part of this server is everything between the model and the wire.
What is actually implemented
- ticker, CIK, or company name resolves to an EDGAR identity, with ambiguous names returning candidates instead of a silent wrong guess;
- filing history spans EDGAR's overflow files, so companies past ~1000 filings don't get silently truncated to the recent page;
- filing text arrives windowed with a
next_offsetcursor — a 10-K is ~206K characters and does not belong in a context window whole; - inline-XBRL scaffolding is stripped, so extracted text starts at the prose
and not at 11K characters of
false2025FY0000320193...; - XBRL concepts come back as a time series, with a tag-discovery tool because nobody knows the right us-gaap tag name off the top of their head;
- one metric can be ranked across every filer for a period via the frames API;
- full-text search covers filings from 2001 onward;
- requests are paced under SEC's 10 req/s ceiling even when a model fires a parallel burst of tool calls;
- responses are cached per-host by the freshness rule that host actually supports.
flowchart LR
M["model tool call"] --> R["resolve ticker / CIK / name"]
R --> C{"cached?"}
C -->|"Archives: immutable"| D["disk, no network"]
C -->|"data.sec.gov: TTL fresh"| D
C -->|"stale or absent"| P["pacer @ 9 req/s"]
P --> E["EDGAR"]
E -->|"429 / 5xx"| P
E --> W["cache write"]
W --> X["iXBRL strip + window"]
D --> X
X --> M
Measured, not implied
Apple M-series, macOS, Python 3.13, live EDGAR. Reproduce with make bench.
| Check | Result |
|---|---|
| Tests passing | 32 |
companyfacts cold fetch |
3.75 MB / 97 ms |
companyfacts warm read |
0.00 MB / 1.4 ms (68×) |
| 10-K document cold fetch | 1.52 MB / 154 ms |
| 10-K document warm read | 0.00 MB / 1.1 ms (138×) |
submissions warm read |
0.00 MB / 0.2 ms (755×) |
| Sustained request rate | 9.2 req/s |
| Peak requests in any 1s window | 10 (SEC ceiling: 10) |
| iXBRL scaffolding removed from a 10-K | 11,303 chars |
| Text extraction throughput | 23.4 MB/s |
| Windows to read a full 10-K @ 40K | 6 |
Both the cache and pacer numbers above are post-fix. The first benchmark run reported a 3.75 MB "cache hit" that was really a full re-download, and 19 requests inside a one-second window against a 10 req/s limit. See DESIGN.md.
Where it loses
- Freshness on
data.sec.govis a guess. That host sends noETagand noLast-Modified, so conditional requests are impossible and freshness falls back to a 1-hour TTL. A filing that lands mid-TTL is invisible until it expires. Passttl=0if you need read-your-writes. - Windowing re-reads, it doesn't range-read. EDGAR honors HTTP
Rangeon Archives (verified:206,accept-ranges: bytes), but partial HTML can't be parsed reliably, so the whole document is fetched once and windowed from cache. The first call on a large filing pays the full download. - Search is never cached. Results are query-shaped and EDGAR's full-text endpoint offers no validators, so every search is a live round trip against the 9 req/s budget.
- The pacer is global. Ten companies queried in parallel serialize at ~9 req/s. Correct, but not fast.
- XBRL values are consolidated totals. Dimensional breakdowns (by segment, by geography) exist in the data and this does not surface them.
- Full-text search starts at 2001. Older filings are reachable through
list_filings, notsearch_filings.
Verify it
make test # 32 tests, no network
make bench # live EDGAR, prints the table above
Setup
SEC requires a User-Agent carrying a real contact address and blocks requests without one. The server refuses to start rather than letting you discover that as a confusing 403 later.
export EDGAR_USER_AGENT="your-project you@example.com"
Build and run the local container over stdio:
docker build -t edgar-mcp:local .
docker run --rm -i \
-e EDGAR_USER_AGENT="your-project you@example.com" \
edgar-mcp:local
The image runs as an unprivileged user and writes its EDGAR cache under that
user's home directory. Mount /home/edgar/.cache/edgar-mcp if the cache should
survive container restarts.
Add to claude_desktop_config.json or .mcp.json:
{
"mcpServers": {
"edgar": {
"command": "uv",
"args": ["run", "--directory", "/path/to/edgar-mcp", "edgar-mcp"],
"env": { "EDGAR_USER_AGENT": "your-project you@example.com" }
}
}
}
Tools
| Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|
lookup_company |
ticker / CIK / name → EDGAR identity |
list_filings |
filing history, filtered by form and date |
get_filing_text |
windowed document text, follow next_offset |
list_concepts |
which XBRL tags a company actually reports |
get_concept |
time series for one tag |
compare_concept |
one tag ranked across all filers for a period |
search_filings |
full-text search, 2001→ |
cache_stats |
hit rate, requests, bytes downloaded |
A typical chain is lookup_company → list_filings → get_filing_text, or
list_concepts → get_concept when you want numbers rather than prose.
License
MIT
推荐服务器
Baidu Map
百度地图核心API现已全面兼容MCP协议,是国内首家兼容MCP协议的地图服务商。
Playwright MCP Server
一个模型上下文协议服务器,它使大型语言模型能够通过结构化的可访问性快照与网页进行交互,而无需视觉模型或屏幕截图。
Magic Component Platform (MCP)
一个由人工智能驱动的工具,可以从自然语言描述生成现代化的用户界面组件,并与流行的集成开发环境(IDE)集成,从而简化用户界面开发流程。
Audiense Insights MCP Server
通过模型上下文协议启用与 Audiense Insights 账户的交互,从而促进营销洞察和受众数据的提取和分析,包括人口统计信息、行为和影响者互动。
VeyraX
一个单一的 MCP 工具,连接你所有喜爱的工具:Gmail、日历以及其他 40 多个工具。
graphlit-mcp-server
模型上下文协议 (MCP) 服务器实现了 MCP 客户端与 Graphlit 服务之间的集成。 除了网络爬取之外,还可以将任何内容(从 Slack 到 Gmail 再到播客订阅源)导入到 Graphlit 项目中,然后从 MCP 客户端检索相关内容。
Kagi MCP Server
一个 MCP 服务器,集成了 Kagi 搜索功能和 Claude AI,使 Claude 能够在回答需要最新信息的问题时执行实时网络搜索。
e2b-mcp-server
使用 MCP 通过 e2b 运行代码。
Neon MCP Server
用于与 Neon 管理 API 和数据库交互的 MCP 服务器
Exa MCP Server
模型上下文协议(MCP)服务器允许像 Claude 这样的 AI 助手使用 Exa AI 搜索 API 进行网络搜索。这种设置允许 AI 模型以安全和受控的方式获取实时的网络信息。