<div align="center">

🔥 GeniusMCP

Quality-aware code intelligence that turns GitHub search into ranked, explainable, import-ready recommendations.

<br/>

Not another grep. An intelligence layer.

Quick Start · How It Works · Soul · Tools · Architecture

</div>

---

The Problem

Every code search tool answers "where is this string?"

None of them answer "what is the best implementation, why, and can I safely use it?"

When you ask genius.hunt("retry with backoff"), GeniusMCP returns:

Archetype 1 — Minimal inline helper
  ✅ 12 LOC, zero deps, copy-paste ready
  Exemplar: owner/repo — score 0.87 (battle_tested)
  Why: test-adjacent, MIT license, 3 years stable

Archetype 2 — Configurable utility
  ✅ Options-driven, max attempts + jitter strategy
  Exemplar: owner/repo2 — score 0.82
  Why: 14K stars, active maintenance, comprehensive docs

Archetype 3 — Middleware pattern
  ✅ Express/Fastify compatible, interceptor-based
  Exemplar: owner/repo3 — score 0.79
  Tradeoff: framework-coupled

Coverage: 3 sources searched, 2 blind spots, confidence: 0.83

That's the gap GeniusMCP fills.

---

✨ Key Features

Feature	What it does
🎯 Archetype Search	Finds 3-5 structural families, not 200 raw matches
📊 6-Bucket Quality Scoring	queryFit · durability · vitality · importability · codeQuality · evidenceConfidence
🔍 Multi-Source Discovery	grep.app (free, 1M repos) + GitHub Code Search (200M repos) + searchcode (75B lines)
🧬 3-Level Dedup	Exact SHA → normalized AST hash → winnowing fingerprint families
📜 Provenance-First Import	License gate · dependency closure · policy checks · attribution
🧠 Persistent Memory	Every search enriches local evidence graph. Session 50 is smarter than session 1.
🪝 Auto-Capture Hooks	Claude Code hooks capture patterns from every file you read/write
💉 Pre-Prompt Injection	Relevant memories injected BEFORE the AI responds
🏗️ 7 Archetype Categories	minimal · configurable · middleware · context-aware · distributed · enterprise · wrapper
📋 Transparent Uncertainty	Every result shows blind spots + evidence confidence
⚡ Tiered Responses	L1 (80 tokens) / L2 (300) / L3 (2000) — adaptive detail level per result count
🛡️ Circuit Breakers	Per-source fault isolation: GitHub/grep.app/searchcode fail independently
🎰 Thompson Sampling	Multi-armed bandit learns which sources produce best results per query type
🔤 SAC Matching	getUserSession finds get_user_session — cross-convention identifier similarity
📦 Signature Compression	Repomix-style 70% token reduction — strips bodies, keeps signatures
🔍 Dynamic Discovery	forge_discover("search code") — find tools by intent, not memorize 28 names

---

🏆 Why GeniusMCP

	GitHub MCP	grep.app MCP	DeusData	GeniusMCP
Multi-source search	1 source	1 source	local only	3 sources
Quality scoring	no	no	no	6-bucket
License verification	no	no	no	yes
Import with provenance	no	no	no	yes
Persistent memory	no	no	knowledge graph	Bayesian + decay
Cross-convention matching	no	no	no	SAC algorithm
Fault tolerance	no	no	no	circuit breakers
Token efficiency	no	no	no	L1/L2/L3 tiers

---

🚀 Quick Start

# 1. Clone and install
git clone https://github.com/geniussigmaskibidi-gif/geniusmcp
cd geniusmcp && pnpm install && pnpm build

# 2. Optional: GitHub auth (enables GitHub Code Search + metadata)
export GITHUB_TOKEN=ghp_your_token

Add to Claude Code (.mcp.json in your project root)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "forgemcp": {
      "command": "node",
      "args": ["/path/to/forgemcp/apps/mcp-server/dist/index.js"],
      "env": { "GITHUB_TOKEN": "ghp_your_token" }
    }
  }
}

Server auto-indexes your project on start. code.reach, code.map, code.symbols work immediately.

Optional: Claude Code Hooks (auto-capture + injection)

{
  "hooks": {
    "PostToolUse": [
      { "matcher": "Read|Write|Edit", "command": "node hooks/genius-capture.js" }
    ],
    "UserPromptSubmit": [
      { "command": "node hooks/genius-inject.js" }
    ]
  }
}

---

💡 Usage Examples

Find the best implementation of a concept

You: "Find me a good rate limiter implementation"
Agent calls: genius.hunt("rate limiter", language: "typescript", tier: "L1")
→ 5 ranked archetypes in 130 tokens, with stars/license/test signals

Import code with license verification

You: "Import that circuit breaker from the best result"
Agent calls: import.extract("owner/repo", "src/circuit-breaker.ts", symbol: "CircuitBreaker")
→ Full code + MIT license verified + provenance hash + attribution comment

Compare approaches across repos

You: "Should I use Zod or Ajv for validation?"
Agent calls: research.deep_compare("validation", ["colinhacks/zod", "ajv-validator/ajv"])
→ Side-by-side: Zod 42K stars vs Ajv 14K, both MIT+CI, structured quality signals

Remember and recall across sessions

Session 1: genius.hunt("retry backoff") → auto-stores top 3 results
Session 2: memory.recall("retry") → instant recall, no API calls needed

Explore unfamiliar repository

You: "How does Hono handle errors?"
Agent calls: research.archaeology("honojs/hono", "error handling")
→ Found .onError() handler, JWT error middleware, 29K stars, TypeScript

Read soul.md for the complete AI agent reasoning guide — search strategies, anti-patterns, and token budget optimization.

---

🔄 How It Works

graph TD
    Q["genius.hunt('retry backoff')"] --> C[QueryCompiler]
    C --> |grep.app queries| G[grep.app MCP]
    C --> |GitHub queries| GH[GitHub Code Search]
    C --> |hydration queries| SC[searchcode.com]

    G --> D[Dedup Engine]
    GH --> D
    SC --> D

    D --> |"180 hits → 60 blobs"| E[Symbol Extractor]
    E --> F[Winnowing Fingerprint]
    F --> |"60 → 8 families"| CL[Archetype Classifier]
    CL --> R[Quality Scorer]
    R --> |"6-bucket ranking"| OUT["3-5 ranked archetypes<br/>with explanations"]

    OUT --> MEM[(Evidence Graph<br/>SQLite)]
    MEM --> |"next search: instant recall"| Q

The Magic Loop

Session 1: "Find best rate limiter" → searches 3 sources → 60 unique blobs → 5 archetypes
           → Results cached in evidence graph

Session 2: "Rate limiter for Express" → local memory: 40 instant hits + 20 new
           → Faster, smarter, more relevant

Session 10: "Throttle middleware" → 120 cached patterns, <100ms response
            → Compound intelligence

---

🛠️ Tools (28 MCP Tools)

🎯 Hunt Intelligence (flagship)

Tool	Description
genius.hunt	Find best implementations with archetype clustering, quality scoring, coverage report
genius.explain	Full signal breakdown: why this ranked #1
genius.compare	Head-to-head comparison with bucket deltas
genius.import	Policy-aware import with provenance manifest

🧠 Memory (compound intelligence)

Tool	Description
memory.recall	Search past patterns by concept
memory.store	Save pattern to persistent memory
memory.evolve	Create improved version linked to parent
memory.related	Find connected patterns
memory.link	Create relationships between patterns
memory.stats	Memory size, coverage, confidence distribution
memory.forget	Remove outdated patterns

🧭 Code Navigation (1 call = 10 Read/Greps)

Tool	Description
code.reach	Jump to symbol with full context: callers, callees, deps
code.map	Instant project architecture map
code.trace	Call chain between functions
code.understand	Compressed module understanding
code.symbols	All exports with signatures

🔬 Research (persistent reasoning chains)

Tool	Description
research.archaeology	Trace code evolution
research.deep_compare	Structured comparison with metrics
research.start_chain	Begin research thread
research.add_step	Record reasoning step
research.conclude	Mark chain completed
research.recall_chain	Search past research

🐙 GitHub

Tool	Description
github.search_repos	Search by query, language, stars
github.search_code	Code search across GitHub
github.repo_overview	Stars, CI, license, health
github.repo_file	Get file content
github.repo_tree	Recursive file tree

---

🏗️ Architecture

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                   GeniusMCP Server                   │
│                                                     │
│  Layer 1: DISCOVERY                                 │
│    grep.app MCP · GitHub Code Search API            │
│                                                     │
│  Layer 2: HYDRATION                                 │
│    GitHub Trees/Contents · searchcode analysis      │
│                                                     │
│  Layer 3: EVIDENCE GRAPH                            │
│    SourceHit → Blob → SymbolSlice → PatternFamily   │
│                                                     │
│  Layer 4: PATTERN INTELLIGENCE                      │
│    3-level dedup · archetype classifier · scorer    │
│                                                     │
│  Layer 5: IMPORT & POLICY                           │
│    License gate · provenance · dep closure          │
│                                                     │
│  Layer 6: EVALUATION                                │
│    Coverage confidence · blind spots · metrics      │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Quality Scoring (RFC v2)

overall = 0.35 × queryFit + 0.50 × qualityComposite + 0.15 × evidenceConfidence

qualityComposite = weights[preset] × {durability, vitality, importability, codeQuality}

Presets: battle_tested · modern_active · minimal_dependency · teaching_quality

Hard caps: snippet_only → evidence ≤ 0.60 · archived → vitality ≤ 0.20 · license_unknown → importability ≤ 0.20

---

📦 Monorepo Structure

forgemcp/
  packages/
    core/              — Types, config, errors (Zod-validated)
    db/                — SQLite WAL, blob store, search index, evidence graph
    ast-intelligence/  — Symbol extraction, call graph, architecture detection
    repo-memory/       — Bayesian confidence + Ebbinghaus decay engine
    github-gateway/    — Octokit + 4-bucket rate governor + ETag cache
    data-sources/      — grep.app + searchcode + source orchestrator
    hunt-engine/       — Winnowing, clustering, scoring, archetype classifier
    importer/          — License policy + provenance + style adaptation
  apps/
    mcp-server/        — MCP server + 5 skill modules + hook daemon + dynamic tools
  hooks/               — Claude Code auto-capture scripts
  tests/               — 252 tests (vitest)
  .github/workflows/   — CI (Node 20/22, build + typecheck + test)

---

🧪 Testing

npx vitest run
# 22 test suites, 252 tests, all passing (<1s)

Suite	Tests	What it covers
foundation	19	ForgeResult, Logger, Health, Context
blob-store	10	Content-addressable storage, dedup, file refs
blob-lifecycle	11	GC, pinning, integrity scrub
symbol-extractor	13	TypeScript, Python, Go extraction + fingerprinting
parser-registry	6	Multi-backend precision routing
search-index	4	FTS5 trigram, BM25, RRF fusion
simhash	14	Near-duplicate detection, Hamming distance
chunker	8	Semantic code chunking, symbol boundaries
query-planner	14	Query classification, lane planning
ranking-v2	13	BM25F weights, retrieval scoring, lexical+structural
memory-engine	15	Store, recall, capture, Bayesian confidence, Ebbinghaus decay
memory-v2	6	L1/L2/L3 capsule builder, token estimation
call-graph	9	2-pass resolution, BFS reachability, path tracing
winnowing	12	Fingerprints, Jaccard similarity, clone clustering
policy-engine	11	4-mode import policy, license gates, provenance
evidence-graph	8	v2 schema: query runs, slices, families, versioned scores
job-queue	10	Durable job queue, priority, backoff, dead-letter
circuit-breaker	19	Circuit breaker state machine, bulkhead, resilient search
token-budget	22	Token estimation, tier selection, truncation, compression
source-selector	5	Thompson Sampling, convergence, discounting
early-terminator	6	Welford online stats, adaptive saturation
sac	17	Subword Affine Canonicalization, cross-convention matching

---

🎯 Design Principles

1. Evidence, not opinions — every score has signals you can inspect
2. Local-first — works offline for indexed repos
3. Zero ML in core — lexical + structural, semantic is opt-in
4. Provenance always — every import traced to source + license
5. Progressive learning — every search enriches the evidence graph
6. Transparent uncertainty — blind spots shown, not hidden

---

📊 Tech Stack

Component	Technology
Protocol	MCP SDK 1.28 (stdio + Streamable HTTP)
Database	SQLite (WAL mode, better-sqlite3)
Search	FTS5 trigram + BM25F + Reciprocal Rank Fusion
AST	Regex multi-language + ast-grep upgrade path
Dedup	Winnowing fingerprints (Schleimer 2003) + Jaccard clustering
GitHub	Octokit + throttling + retry + 4-bucket rate governor
External	grep.app MCP + searchcode.com
Validation	Zod
Resilience	Circuit breakers + bulkheads + decorrelated jitter
Ranking	SAC cross-convention matching + Thompson Sampling source routing
Token Efficiency	L1/L2/L3 tiered responses + signature compression
Tests	Vitest (252 tests, <1s)
Monorepo	pnpm + Turborepo

---

📄 License

MIT

---

<div align="center">

Built for AI agents that never forget.

Report Bug · Request Feature · Discussions

</div>