ghl-context-mcp
Enables AI agents to pull focused GoHighLevel context before talking to a contact, including contact lookup, timeline summaries, pipeline positions, and appointments, with optional guarded writes. It helps agents brief themselves on a person without exposing raw CRM API noise.
README
ghl-context-mcp
A deliberately small GoHighLevel MCP server. Six tools, scoped to one job: knowing who you're about to talk to.
Why this exists
The common failure mode when you put an agent on top of a CRM is a wide, generic
tool surface that dumps raw API JSON: the model picks the wrong tool, burns its
context window on fields no one would ever say out loud, and occasionally
invents or overwrites a record. This server takes the opposite bet. It ships six
tools, each scoped to the moment an agent is about to talk to a contact. Every
field it returns is something a person would say or something the agent passes
back on the next call. It does the date math itself, and it keeps writes off until
you switch them on. The claim that a narrow surface beats a wide one is measurable,
and the companion benchmark (mcp-tool-surface-bench) is being built to measure
it.
The tools
| Tool | What it does | Kind | Ceiling |
|---|---|---|---|
find_contact |
Resolve a name, phone, or email to exactly one contact, or return candidates | read | 400 |
get_contact_timeline |
Recent calls, SMS, notes, appointments, and stage changes as prose, with a headline | read | 1200 |
get_pipeline_position |
Where each deal sits, days in stage, value, and whether it stalled | read | 500 |
get_appointments |
Upcoming appointments for a contact or calendar, with relative times | read | 900 |
log_note |
Write a note, with retry-safe idempotency and an echo of what stored | write | 200 |
move_stage |
Move a deal to another stage, guarded by a stale-context check | write | 250 |
Ceilings are per-response token budgets, enforced by a test that fails the build when a response grows past them. See DESIGN.md for what "token" means here.
Using it
This is an MCP server, and the intended user is an AI agent, not a person at a terminal. You connect the server to your agent (Claude Code, Claude Desktop, or any MCP-capable runtime), then talk to the agent in plain language. The agent is the one that decides to resolve a contact and pull their context.
Team quickstart with Claude Code
-
Clone the repo, then install and build:
npm install && npm run build -
Add your credentials:
cp .env.example .env # then edit .env and fill in GHL_PIT and GHL_LOCATION_ID -
Open the folder in Claude Code. It reads the checked-in
.mcp.json, offers theghl-contextserver, and you approve it once. The server loads.envon startup, so no token ever lives in a config file. -
Talk to your agent the way a rep would at the start of the day:
I'm calling Marcus Halloway and Priya Nair today. Give me a pre-call brief before each one.
The agent resolves each contact, pulls the timeline, pipeline position, and upcoming appointments, and hands back the briefing.
Other MCP clients
Point any MCP client at the server over stdio. The published package needs no
clone and no build. For Claude Desktop, add this to claude_desktop_config.json:
{
"mcpServers": {
"ghl-context": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "ghl-context-mcp"],
"env": {
"GHL_PIT": "pit-...",
"GHL_LOCATION_ID": "your-sub-account-id"
}
}
}
}
To run a local checkout instead of the published package, set command to node
and args to your built dist/index.js.
Environment variables
| Variable | Required | Default | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
GHL_PIT |
yes | Private Integration Token for one sub-account | |
GHL_LOCATION_ID |
yes | The sub-account id the token belongs to | |
GHL_ALLOW_WRITES |
no | false |
Writes refuse unless this is exactly true |
GHL_STALL_MULTIPLIER |
no | 2 |
Stall threshold as a multiple of median time-in-stage |
GHL_RESOLVE_STRATEGY |
no | fuzzy |
fuzzy or exact contact retrieval |
Create the token under Settings, Integrations, Private Integrations, with the
scopes contacts.readonly, contacts.write, opportunities.readonly,
opportunities.write, and calendars.readonly.
Seeing it without a client
If you do not have an MCP client handy, the repo ships a terminal demo that runs the same sequence an agent would and prints the brief:
npm run brief -- "Marcus Halloway"
It is a demonstration of the value, not the product. The product is the agent connection above.
From source
npm install
npm run build
npm test
npm test runs green with no credentials. The live checks, npm run live-check
and npm run live-write-check, need a real .env.
Response shapes
A resolved contact:
{
"resolution": "exact",
"contact": {
"contact_id": "NnAyKFnTSAVKg1amAArO",
"name": "Marcus Halloway",
"primary_phone": "+15551230010",
"primary_email": "marcus.halloway@example.com",
"tags": ["synthetic-seed"],
"owner": null,
"last_activity_at": null,
"last_activity_summary": null
}
}
An ambiguous match returns candidates instead of guessing:
{
"resolution": "ambiguous",
"candidates": [
{
"contact_id": "...",
"name": "Jordan Wells",
"primary_phone": "+15551230012",
"primary_email": "jordan.wells@example.com",
"last_activity_at": null
},
{
"contact_id": "...",
"name": "Jordan Wells",
"primary_phone": "+15551230013",
"primary_email": "jordan.wells.cpa@example.com",
"last_activity_at": null
}
],
"disambiguate_by": ["email", "primary_phone"],
"instruction": "Ask the user which one, or call again with the exact email or phone."
}
Ambiguity is treated as a success. An agent that hits an error stops, while one handed a candidate list keeps going and asks the user which contact they meant.
Errors
Every error is one shape. No raw HTTP status reaches the model.
| Code | When | Retryable |
|---|---|---|
CONTACT_NOT_FOUND |
No contact matched the query | no |
OPPORTUNITY_NOT_FOUND |
No opportunity with that id | no |
STAGE_NOT_IN_PIPELINE |
Target stage is not in the pipeline (lists valid stages) | no |
STALE_CONTEXT |
The asserted current stage does not match live state | yes, after re-read |
MISSING_CONFIRMATION |
move_stage called without confirm |
yes |
WRITES_DISABLED |
A write was attempted with writes off | no |
SCOPE_MISSING |
The token lacks a required scope | no |
AUTH_INVALID |
The token was rejected | no |
RATE_LIMITED |
GoHighLevel is throttling (carries retry_after_seconds) |
yes |
UPSTREAM_ERROR |
GoHighLevel returned an error | yes, once |
WINDOW_TOO_LARGE |
The requested time window exceeds 365 days | yes |
Design notes
The eight rules the server is built on, one line each. The long version, with the reasoning an interviewer would ask about, is in DESIGN.md.
- One job per tool. If the description needs an "and", it is two tools.
- Descriptions are written for the model: when to use, when not, and the sibling it's confused with.
- No raw API shapes leave the boundary, enforced by a test.
- Errors are instructions, in imperative voice, with valid options listed.
- Every response has a token ceiling, enforced by a build-failing test.
- The server does the arithmetic: ages, durations, relative times, counts.
- Writes assert the state they depend on and fail loudly on a mismatch.
- Writes are off unless
GHL_ALLOW_WRITES=true.
What this does not do
Each cut is deliberate.
| Not shipped | Why |
|---|---|
create_contact, update_contact |
Agents inventing or overwriting records is the top real-world failure. Creation belongs in a form or a human flow. |
send_sms, send_email |
Outbound messaging under agent control is a compliance surface. A context server has no business shipping it. |
list_contacts, multi-filter search |
Unbounded result sets burn a context window. The agent needs one resolved match, not a list. |
list_pipelines, list_calendars |
Schema-discovery tools mostly cost a turn. Names resolve to ids inside the tools, and invalid names return the valid options. |
| Workflow / automation triggers | Side effects the server cannot describe in advance or undo afterward. |
get_precall_brief (a composite of the four reads) |
Held back on purpose so the benchmark can test it as a separate arm. If it wins, it ships in v2 with the data behind it. |
Limitations
Single location, Private Integration Token auth only, no OAuth. Pagination is bounded to the per-tool maximums. Stall detection needs volume to be meaningful and currently uses a fixed fallback because GoHighLevel exposes no stage history. Phone matching is US-centric. Token ceilings are proxy tokens, not exact Claude tokens. GoHighLevel reads trail writes by about a second. Tested against one account shape.
License
MIT
推荐服务器
Baidu Map
百度地图核心API现已全面兼容MCP协议,是国内首家兼容MCP协议的地图服务商。
Playwright MCP Server
一个模型上下文协议服务器,它使大型语言模型能够通过结构化的可访问性快照与网页进行交互,而无需视觉模型或屏幕截图。
Magic Component Platform (MCP)
一个由人工智能驱动的工具,可以从自然语言描述生成现代化的用户界面组件,并与流行的集成开发环境(IDE)集成,从而简化用户界面开发流程。
Audiense Insights MCP Server
通过模型上下文协议启用与 Audiense Insights 账户的交互,从而促进营销洞察和受众数据的提取和分析,包括人口统计信息、行为和影响者互动。
VeyraX
一个单一的 MCP 工具,连接你所有喜爱的工具:Gmail、日历以及其他 40 多个工具。
graphlit-mcp-server
模型上下文协议 (MCP) 服务器实现了 MCP 客户端与 Graphlit 服务之间的集成。 除了网络爬取之外,还可以将任何内容(从 Slack 到 Gmail 再到播客订阅源)导入到 Graphlit 项目中,然后从 MCP 客户端检索相关内容。
Kagi MCP Server
一个 MCP 服务器,集成了 Kagi 搜索功能和 Claude AI,使 Claude 能够在回答需要最新信息的问题时执行实时网络搜索。
e2b-mcp-server
使用 MCP 通过 e2b 运行代码。
Neon MCP Server
用于与 Neon 管理 API 和数据库交互的 MCP 服务器
Exa MCP Server
模型上下文协议(MCP)服务器允许像 Claude 这样的 AI 助手使用 Exa AI 搜索 API 进行网络搜索。这种设置允许 AI 模型以安全和受控的方式获取实时的网络信息。