GitHub Repo Health Check—Maintained or Abandoned? (MCP Server)

GitHub Repo Health Check—Maintained or Abandoned? (MCP Server)

MCP server: is this GitHub repo still maintained? A verdict.

Category
访问服务器

README

GitHub Repo Health Check — a maintainability verdict, not another dashboard

GitHub Repo Health Check is an MCP server that answers the one question your dependency list can't: is this repo still maintained, or am I building on sand? Last-commit date lies. Star count lies. One signal isn't a verdict. So it returns a four-way read — Actively maintained, Slowing, At-risk, or Likely abandoned — synthesized across four dimensions (activity, issues, PRs, contributors), backed by the transparent, inspectable thresholds that produced it. Point it at any owner/name (or GitHub URL) and your agent gets a verdict it can act on, plus the raw numbers so it can see exactly why. Same repo state + config → the same verdict, every time.

It runs as a Standby Actor on the Apify platform — always warm, reachable over the Streamable HTTP transport at the /mcp path, with API access, scheduling, and monitoring included.

Who is this for?

  • Agent developers whose agents need to decide whether to adopt, recommend, or monitor an open-source library or tool
  • Dependency due-diligence — vetting whether a package's upstream is alive before committing to it
  • OSS vendor evaluation — checking the health of a project before building on it
  • Repo triage at scale — ranking a list of candidates by health before a human reviews them
  • Automated monitoring — scheduling recurring checks and alerting when a dependency starts slowing

If you've ever asked "is this repo abandoned?" or run a GitHub repo health check by hand, this server does it programmatically at any scale.

Why use GitHub Repo Health Check?

Most GitHub tools hand an agent raw API access and leave the judgment to the model — inconsistent, hand-rolled heuristics on every call. This server does the synthesis for you.

The differentiator is judgment, not raw access: every verdict ships alongside the pinned thresholds and raw metrics that produced it, so the agent (and you) can audit the reasoning. Same repo state + same config always yields the same verdict.

One GitHub fetch per repository is cached and shared across all five tools. Drilling from the headline verdict into a specific dimension costs no extra upstream calls.

How to use GitHub Repo Health Check

  1. Deploy the Actor — run it in Standby mode on Apify. It boots with no input required.
  2. Connect your MCP client to the Standby endpoint (https://<your-standby-url>/mcp) using the Streamable HTTP transport.
  3. Call get_repo_health with a repo argument ("owner/name" or any https://github.com/owner/name URL) to get the headline verdict.
  4. Add a GitHub token — this is effectively required. The Actor's primary data source (GitHub's GraphQL API) rejects unauthenticated requests, and Apify's shared egress IPs exhaust GitHub's anonymous quota almost immediately. Without a token the Actor returns rate-limit errors, not verdicts. See Input for setup.
  5. Drill into dimensions — call get_activity_metrics, get_issue_health, get_pr_health, or get_contributor_insights when you need detail beyond the headline. All five tools read from the same cached payload.

The five tools

All tools take a single repo argument — either "owner/name" or any https://github.com/owner/name[/...] URL (case-insensitive).

get_repo_health — headline verdict

Returns the overall verdict, a per-dimension breakdown, and a rationale string explaining the worst dimension.

{
  "repo": "honojs/hono",
  "overallVerdict": "Actively maintained",
  "dimensions": {
    "activity":     { "verdict": "Healthy", "lastCommitDaysAgo": 1, "commits90d": 412 },
    "issues":       { "verdict": "Healthy", "medianFirstResponseDays": 2.4, "staleOpenRatio": 0.12 },
    "pullRequests": { "verdict": "Healthy", "mergeRate": 0.88, "oldestOpenPrDaysAgo": 14 },
    "contributors": { "verdict": "Healthy", "totalContributors": 312, "busFactorFlag": false }
  },
  "rationale": "Overall: activity is Healthy; weakest dimension is issues (Healthy).",
  "stars": 21000,
  "forks": 640,
  "fetchedAt": "2026-06-01T00:00:00.000Z",
  "authenticated": true
}

get_activity_metrics — commit cadence and momentum

Commit volumes over trailing windows, release frequency, and a momentum trend.

{
  "repo": "honojs/hono",
  "verdict": "Healthy",
  "lastCommitDaysAgo": 1,
  "commits30d": 140,
  "commits90d": 412,
  "commits365d": 1680,
  "releaseCount365d": 48,
  "lastReleaseDaysAgo": 3,
  "momentumTrend": "steady",
  "fetchedAt": "2026-06-01T00:00:00.000Z"
}

momentumTrend is accelerating / steady / declining, derived from the 30-day commit rate vs the 90-day rate. Repos that tag rather than cutting GitHub Releases will show releaseCount365d: 0 and lastReleaseDaysAgo: null — this does not by itself degrade the verdict.

get_issue_health — responsiveness and backlog hygiene

How quickly maintainers respond to issues and how much of the backlog has gone stale.

{
  "repo": "honojs/hono",
  "verdict": "Healthy",
  "openIssues": 32,
  "closedIssues": 1840,
  "openClosedRatio": 0.017,
  "medianFirstResponseDays": 2.4,
  "medianTimeToCloseDays": 5.1,
  "staleOpenIssues": 4,
  "staleOpenRatio": 0.12,
  "fetchedAt": "2026-06-01T00:00:00.000Z"
}

An issue is stale if untouched for more than 90 days. Medians are null when no qualifying events exist in the analysis window — absence is not the same as zero.

get_pr_health — PR throughput and queue age

How effectively the project merges or closes contributions, and how old the oldest open PR is.

{
  "repo": "honojs/hono",
  "verdict": "Healthy",
  "openPrs": 6,
  "mergedPrs": 220,
  "closedUnmergedPrs": 30,
  "mergeRate": 0.88,
  "medianTimeToMergeDays": 1.2,
  "oldestOpenPrDaysAgo": 14,
  "fetchedAt": "2026-06-01T00:00:00.000Z"
}

mergeRate excludes still-open PRs from the denominator. It is null when no PRs have been decided in the analysis window.

get_contributor_insights — concentration and bus-factor risk

How many contributors the project has and whether commit activity is dangerously concentrated.

{
  "repo": "honojs/hono",
  "verdict": "Healthy",
  "totalContributors": 312,
  "topContributorShare": 0.28,
  "topTwoContributorShare": 0.41,
  "busFactorFlag": false,
  "fetchedAt": "2026-06-01T00:00:00.000Z"
}

busFactorFlag is true when the top contributor owns more than 50% of commits, or the top two together own more than 80%. totalContributors is the repository's all-time contributor count (sourced from GitHub's stable /contributors list endpoint) — it is not a 90-day-active count.

Verdict thresholds

Verdicts come from pinned, transparent thresholds — same repo state plus same config always yields the same verdict.

Dimension Healthy Moderate At-Risk Notes
Activity last commit ≤ 30d 30–180d 180–365d Likely abandoned if > 365d
Issues median first response ≤ 7d and staleOpenRatio ≤ 0.40 ≤ 30d and ≤ 0.60 otherwise null median → judged on staleOpenRatio alone
Pull requests mergeRate ≥ 0.60 and oldestOpenPr ≤ 30d mergeRate ≥ 0.30 or oldestOpenPr ≤ 90d otherwise null mergeRate → judged on oldestOpenPr alone
Contributors totalContributors ≥ 3 and not bus-factor 1–2 contributors, or ≥ 3 with bus-factor 0 contributors solo active maintainer → at most Moderate

Overall verdict is activity-dominant, evaluated top-down (first match wins):

  1. Likely abandoned — activity is Likely abandoned (no commits in > 365 days).
  2. At-risk — activity is At-Risk, or any two of {issues, PRs, contributors} are At-Risk.
  3. Actively maintained — activity is Healthy and no dimension is At-Risk.
  4. Slowing — everything else (e.g. activity Moderate, or Healthy activity with one At-Risk dimension).

Input

The server boots with no input required (a Standby constraint — all fields are optional in the schema so the container never crash-loops on startup). In practice, you must provide a GitHub token for the Actor to return verdicts rather than rate-limit errors.

Field Type Default Description
githubToken string (secret) Effectively required. GitHub's GraphQL API (this Actor's primary data source) rejects unauthenticated requests, and on Apify's shared IPs the anonymous REST quota (~60 req/hour per IP) is typically already exhausted by other traffic. A token gives 5,000 req/hour and enables private-repo analysis.
cacheTtlMinutes integer 20 How long a repo's fetched payload is reused before refetching. Lower = fresher data; higher = fewer GitHub API calls.
analysisWindowDays integer 90 Trailing window (30–365 days) over which issue and PR activity is measured.

GitHub token setup. A classic token with no scopes is sufficient for public repositories. A fine-grained token scoped to specific repos works for private-repo analysis. For Standby deployments the recommended approach is to set a GITHUB_TOKEN environment variable on the Actor (stored as a secret) rather than pasting the token into the input field — it persists across restarts. Both paths work; both are stored as secrets and never exposed in logs.

Output

Each tool returns a single structured JSON object (shown above in each tool's section). Responses are deterministic — same repo state plus same config always produces the same verdict. Each response includes a fetchedAt timestamp reflecting when the underlying GitHub payload was pulled. A cached read returns the same timestamp as the original fetch for that TTL window.

Data fields reference

Field What it tells you
overallVerdict The headline: Actively maintained / Slowing / At-risk / Likely abandoned
lastCommitDaysAgo Days since the most recent commit; null if no commits found
commits30d / commits90d / commits365d Commit counts over trailing 30, 90, and 365-day windows
momentumTrend Whether commit rate is accelerating, steady, or declining (30d vs 90d rate)
medianFirstResponseDays Median time (days) until a maintainer first responds to a new issue
staleOpenRatio Fraction of open issues that have had no activity in 90+ days
mergeRate Merged PRs ÷ (merged + closed-unmerged) — excludes still-open PRs
oldestOpenPrDaysAgo Age of the oldest PR that is still open
totalContributors All-time contributor count (not a 90-day-active figure — see FAQ)
busFactorFlag true when commit activity is dangerously concentrated on 1–2 people

Pricing

This Actor runs in Standby mode and is billed for the compute used while warm and serving requests. Health reads are lightweight — each repo's GitHub data is fetched once, cached (default 20 minutes), and shared across all five tools. Drilling into multiple dimensions for the same repo costs a single upstream fetch.

A GitHub token is required in practice (see Input) and adds no extra Apify cost.

Tips

  • Start with get_repo_health for the headline verdict, then call a dimension tool only when you need detail — they all share the same cached payload.
  • Raise cacheTtlMinutes when triaging a long list of repos in a batch to minimize GitHub API calls. Lower it when you need fresh reads.
  • Set GITHUB_TOKEN as an environment variable on the Actor rather than in the input field — it persists across Standby restarts without re-supplying input.
  • Adjust analysisWindowDays (30–365) to match how recent you need issue and PR signals to be. A shorter window surfaces recent trajectory; a longer window averages over a steadier baseline.

How it works

  1. An MCP client sends a tool call (e.g. get_repo_health) with a repo argument.
  2. The server checks an in-memory LRU cache. On a miss, it fires a single GraphQL query to GitHub's API (plus a REST call for contributor data) and caches the raw payload.
  3. Pure metric-computation functions derive counts, medians, and ratios from the payload — no further network calls.
  4. Verdict functions compare each metric against the pinned thresholds in config.ts and return a dimension verdict.
  5. The overall verdict is composed from the four dimension verdicts using the activity-dominant rule above.
  6. The full result — verdict, per-dimension breakdown, raw metrics, and fetchedAt — is returned to the MCP client.

All five tools share step 2's cached payload. The verdict logic is deterministic and clock-injected (testable without network).

Works well with

Part of a small slate of agent-focused Apify Actors:

  • SERP Topic Gap Monitor — finds topic gaps in search-result coverage and produces scored gap reports.
  • Changelog Triage Agent — monitors product changelogs across services, classifies each new entry as BREAKING / WARNING / INFO, and delivers a de-duplicated triage report so teams catch deprecations before they bite.
  • Docs MCP Server — an MCP server giving AI assistants queryable access to framework documentation (Next.js, React, Tailwind, TypeScript, Prisma).

FAQ and support

Does it work on private repositories? Yes — provide a githubToken with read access to the repo.

Is the verdict subjective or configurable? No. Every verdict comes from the pinned thresholds documented above. Same repo state always yields the same verdict. The raw metrics are returned alongside it so you can audit every call.

Why is totalContributors not a 90-day-active count? GitHub's per-period contributor stats endpoint (/stats/contributors) is unreliable on a cold cache — it returns 202 and rarely warms within a request cycle. Contributors are sourced from the stable all-time /contributors list instead. The field reflects repository-lifetime contributor breadth, not recent activity.

What does the rationale field contain? It names the activity verdict and the weakest non-activity dimension, e.g. "Overall: activity is Healthy; weakest dimension is issues (Moderate)." It's designed for agent logs and human audit trails, not user-facing copy.

The Actor returned a rate-limit error — what do I do? Add a GitHub token. See Input. A classic token with no scopes is free and takes under a minute to create at github.com/settings/tokens.

Found a bug or want a feature? Open an issue on the Actor's Issues tab. Custom variations are available on request.

License

Copyright © 2026 Joe Slade.

Licensed under the GNU Affero General Public License v3.0 (AGPL-3.0). You're free to use, study, modify, and self-host this software; if you run a modified version as a network service, the AGPL requires you to offer your modified source to its users under the same license. For a commercial license not subject to the AGPL's network-copyleft, contact the author.

推荐服务器

Baidu Map

Baidu Map

百度地图核心API现已全面兼容MCP协议,是国内首家兼容MCP协议的地图服务商。

官方
精选
JavaScript
Playwright MCP Server

Playwright MCP Server

一个模型上下文协议服务器,它使大型语言模型能够通过结构化的可访问性快照与网页进行交互,而无需视觉模型或屏幕截图。

官方
精选
TypeScript
Magic Component Platform (MCP)

Magic Component Platform (MCP)

一个由人工智能驱动的工具,可以从自然语言描述生成现代化的用户界面组件,并与流行的集成开发环境(IDE)集成,从而简化用户界面开发流程。

官方
精选
本地
TypeScript
Audiense Insights MCP Server

Audiense Insights MCP Server

通过模型上下文协议启用与 Audiense Insights 账户的交互,从而促进营销洞察和受众数据的提取和分析,包括人口统计信息、行为和影响者互动。

官方
精选
本地
TypeScript
VeyraX

VeyraX

一个单一的 MCP 工具,连接你所有喜爱的工具:Gmail、日历以及其他 40 多个工具。

官方
精选
本地
graphlit-mcp-server

graphlit-mcp-server

模型上下文协议 (MCP) 服务器实现了 MCP 客户端与 Graphlit 服务之间的集成。 除了网络爬取之外,还可以将任何内容(从 Slack 到 Gmail 再到播客订阅源)导入到 Graphlit 项目中,然后从 MCP 客户端检索相关内容。

官方
精选
TypeScript
Kagi MCP Server

Kagi MCP Server

一个 MCP 服务器,集成了 Kagi 搜索功能和 Claude AI,使 Claude 能够在回答需要最新信息的问题时执行实时网络搜索。

官方
精选
Python
e2b-mcp-server

e2b-mcp-server

使用 MCP 通过 e2b 运行代码。

官方
精选
Neon MCP Server

Neon MCP Server

用于与 Neon 管理 API 和数据库交互的 MCP 服务器

官方
精选
Exa MCP Server

Exa MCP Server

模型上下文协议(MCP)服务器允许像 Claude 这样的 AI 助手使用 Exa AI 搜索 API 进行网络搜索。这种设置允许 AI 模型以安全和受控的方式获取实时的网络信息。

官方
精选