gitpulse-mcp
Exposes GitHub engineering-analytics tools to LLM clients, enabling queries about code review bottlenecks, stale PRs, and commit hygiene.
README
gitpulse-mcp
A remote MCP (Model Context Protocol) server that exposes GitHub engineering-analytics tools to LLM clients — Claude Desktop, Claude Code, the Cloudflare AI Playground, or any MCP-compatible client. It answers three questions:
- Where are code reviews bottlenecked? (time-to-first-review, time-to-merge, worst offenders)
- Which open PRs are at risk of going stale? (no review activity past a threshold)
- Is our commit hygiene improving? (% of commits matching a convention, trend over time)
Built as a portfolio project generalizing a commit-lint + CI enforcement tool
([A-Z]+-[0-9]+: description) into a broader "engineering health" MCP server.
Architecture
flowchart LR
Client["MCP Client\n(Claude Desktop / Code / AI Playground)"] -->|Streamable HTTP /mcp| Worker
subgraph Worker["Cloudflare Worker"]
MCP["GitPulseMCP\n(McpAgent, Durable Object)"]
Tools["tools/\nrepoPulse · stalePrs · reviewBottlenecks · commitLint"]
Analytics["analytics/\npure functions: percentiles, staleness, lint stats"]
Cache["cache.ts\nWorkers KV, TTL 10-15min"]
GH["github/client.ts\nfetch wrapper, retries, rate-limit handling"]
end
MCP --> Tools
Tools --> Analytics
Tools --> Cache
Tools --> GH
GH -->|REST + GraphQL| GitHub[("GitHub API")]
Cache -.->|get/put| KV[("Workers KV")]
Tools
get_repo_pulse(owner, repo, days = 30)
Activity snapshot: PRs opened/merged/closed, commit count, active contributor count over the window.
"How active has
cloudflare/workers-sdkbeen in the last 2 weeks?"
find_stale_prs(owner, repo, stale_after_days = 7)
Open PRs with no activity past the threshold, sorted most-stale first (capped at 20).
"Which open PRs on
vercel/next.jshaven't been touched in over a week?"
get_review_bottlenecks(owner, repo, days = 30)
Median + p90 time-to-first-review and time-to-merge for recently merged PRs, plus the 5 slowest. Uses a single paginated GraphQL search query to avoid REST fan-out.
"Where is code review slowest in
facebook/reactright now?"
lint_commit_history(owner, repo, days = 30, pattern = "^[A-Z]+-[0-9]+: .+")
% of commits matching a regex convention, worst-offender authors, and week-over-week trend. Pattern is compiled defensively (invalid regex and pathological length are rejected before matching).
"Is commit message hygiene improving on our repo month over month?"
Every tool returns shaped JSON plus a one-line summary string, and caches its result
in Workers KV (key: toolName:sha256(args), TTL 10–15 min) to stay within GitHub's
rate limits.
Design decisions
- GraphQL only for
get_review_bottlenecks. Computing time-to-first-review per PR over REST would mean one request per PR (N+1) to fetch review timelines. GraphQL'ssearchconnection lets us pull merged PRs and their first review in one paginated query. find_stale_prsusesupdated_atas an activity proxy (v1). The REST PR list endpoint doesn't expose "last review activity" directly; a more precise signal (last review/comment event) would require a timeline fetch per PR. Revisit ifupdated_atproves too noisy (e.g. bot-only pushes counting as activity).- Secrets never touch
vars.GITHUB_TOKENis awrangler secret, not awrangler.jsoncvar — the config file is committed to a public repo.
Local development
npm install
cp .dev.vars.example .dev.vars # then fill in a fine-grained PAT (public repo, read-only)
npm run dev # wrangler dev -> http://localhost:8787/mcp
npm test # vitest — analytics unit tests against fixture JSON
npm run typecheck # tsc --noEmit
Connect a local MCP client with mcp-remote
pointed at http://localhost:8787/mcp, or use the
Cloudflare AI Playground against the deployed URL.
Deploying
wrangler kv namespace create GITPULSE_CACHE # once, then paste the id into wrangler.jsonc
wrangler secret put GITHUB_TOKEN # once per environment
npm run deploy
CI runs typecheck + tests on every PR and deploys to workers.dev on merge to main
(needs a CLOUDFLARE_API_TOKEN repo secret).
Roadmap
- Phase 1 (current): core server. 4 tools, PAT auth, KV caching, fixture-based tests, CI/CD.
- Phase 2: real auth. Migrate to GitHub OAuth (per-user tokens, private-repo access), drop the shared PAT.
- Phase 3: backfill/precompute. Background jobs + persistence for large-repo history that times out at request time.
- Phase 4: polish & publish. Per-client rate limiting, basic metrics, a write-up analyzing a large OSS repo.
Not in scope (unless explicitly requested): dashboard UI, multi-repo org aggregation, webhooks, write-access tools, non-GitHub forges.
推荐服务器
Baidu Map
百度地图核心API现已全面兼容MCP协议,是国内首家兼容MCP协议的地图服务商。
Playwright MCP Server
一个模型上下文协议服务器,它使大型语言模型能够通过结构化的可访问性快照与网页进行交互,而无需视觉模型或屏幕截图。
Magic Component Platform (MCP)
一个由人工智能驱动的工具,可以从自然语言描述生成现代化的用户界面组件,并与流行的集成开发环境(IDE)集成,从而简化用户界面开发流程。
Audiense Insights MCP Server
通过模型上下文协议启用与 Audiense Insights 账户的交互,从而促进营销洞察和受众数据的提取和分析,包括人口统计信息、行为和影响者互动。
VeyraX
一个单一的 MCP 工具,连接你所有喜爱的工具:Gmail、日历以及其他 40 多个工具。
graphlit-mcp-server
模型上下文协议 (MCP) 服务器实现了 MCP 客户端与 Graphlit 服务之间的集成。 除了网络爬取之外,还可以将任何内容(从 Slack 到 Gmail 再到播客订阅源)导入到 Graphlit 项目中,然后从 MCP 客户端检索相关内容。
Kagi MCP Server
一个 MCP 服务器,集成了 Kagi 搜索功能和 Claude AI,使 Claude 能够在回答需要最新信息的问题时执行实时网络搜索。
e2b-mcp-server
使用 MCP 通过 e2b 运行代码。
Neon MCP Server
用于与 Neon 管理 API 和数据库交互的 MCP 服务器
Exa MCP Server
模型上下文协议(MCP)服务器允许像 Claude 这样的 AI 助手使用 Exa AI 搜索 API 进行网络搜索。这种设置允许 AI 模型以安全和受控的方式获取实时的网络信息。