HumanJudge
Human-evaluation infrastructure for AI quality. 25,000+ blind human reviews by 200+ verified reviewers across 58 AI models — query the data via five MCP tools (get_model_scores, compare_models, get_flags, check_content, get_latest).
README
grandjury
Real human evaluations of AI models. 25,000+ blind reviews by 200+ verified reviewers across 58 models (GPT-5, Claude Opus 4.7, Gemini 3.1, Grok 4.3, DeepSeek V4, Mistral, Kimi K2.6 and more) and 44 benchmarks. Free. Python SDK + MCP server + ChatGPT GPT + REST.
Get human feedback on your AI in 3 lines of Python:
from grandjury import GrandJury
gj = GrandJury() # reads GRANDJURY_API_KEY from env
gj.trace(name="chat", input=prompt, output=response, model="gpt-4o")
Then open your Jupyter notebook:
df = gj.results() # traces with human votes — as a DataFrame
print(f"Pass rate: {df['pass_rate'].mean():.1%}")
Patent Pending.
Why HumanJudge
Most AI evaluation pipelines use LLMs to judge LLMs. That inherits the same biases, conventions, and blind spots as the models being evaluated — and tends to produce eval pipelines with ~0% disagreement, which is the diagnostic for "not measuring quality, just confirming assumptions" (essay).
HumanJudge uses real human reviewers who blind-evaluate AI outputs across structured benchmarks (marketing, healthcare, end-of-life conversations, cultural fluency, code review, and more) and write their reasoning. Reviewers earn XP, get credentialing letters, and stay anonymous to the reader by default.
The data is queryable via this SDK, the MCP server, a ChatGPT GPT action, and a REST API.
Integrations
| Surface | Install | Docs |
|---|---|---|
| Python SDK | pip install grandjury |
docs/pulse/python-sdk |
| Claude Desktop MCP | Add https://api.humanjudge.com/mcp as a custom connector |
docs/pulse/claude-desktop |
| Claude Code MCP | Add to .mcp.json (remote, no install) |
docs/pulse/claude-code |
| ChatGPT GPT | Search "HumanJudge" in the GPT Store | docs/pulse/chatgpt |
| REST API | n/a | humanjudge.com/docs |
Use cases
- ML engineers — benchmark your model against 58+ commercial models on real tasks; see exactly what humans flag with category + reasoning
- Data scientists — pull reviewer reasoning, flag patterns, and disagreement data as pandas DataFrames for analysis
- AI agent developers — log traces from any agent loop (decorator, context manager, or direct call); get reviewer feedback you can quote to stakeholders
- Independent researchers — query the public benchmark data without an API key (read-only)
- Builders — register your own AI, create a custom benchmark on the topics you care about, get real human reviews on YOUR specific use case (humanjudge.com/for-developers)
What is GrandJury?
HumanJudge connects your AI to a community of human reviewers who evaluate your model's outputs. GrandJury is the Python SDK — it sends traces and retrieves human evaluation results.
Write path: Log AI calls from your app → traces appear in your developer dashboard. Read path: Fetch evaluation results (votes, pass rates, reviewer feedback) into DataFrames for analysis.
Installation
pip install grandjury
Optional performance dependencies:
pip install grandjury[performance] # msgspec, pyarrow, polars
Quick Start
1. Register your model
Go to humanjudge.com/projects/new, register your AI, and copy the secret key.
export GRANDJURY_API_KEY=gj_sk_live_...
2. Log traces from your app
from grandjury import GrandJury
gj = GrandJury() # zero-config — reads from env
# Option A: Direct call
gj.trace(name="chat", input="What is ML?", output="Machine learning is...", model="gpt-4o")
# Option B: Decorator — auto-captures input/output/latency
@gj.observe(name="chat", model="gpt-4o")
def call_llm(prompt: str) -> str:
return openai.chat(prompt)
# Option C: Context manager
with gj.span("chat", input=prompt) as s:
response = call_llm(prompt)
s.set_output(response)
3. Get human evaluation results
Once reviewers vote on your traces:
# Trace-level summary
df = gj.results()
# trace_id | input | output | model | pass_count | flag_count | total_votes | pass_rate
# Individual votes with reviewer identity
df_votes = gj.results(detail='votes')
# trace_id | voter_id | voter_name | verdict | flag_category | feedback | created_at
# Filter by benchmark
df_benchmark = gj.results(evaluation='marketing-benchmark')
# Export
df.to_parquet('evaluation_results.parquet')
4. Run analytics
Works on both live platform data and offline datasets:
# Auto-fetch from platform
gj.analytics.vote_histogram()
gj.analytics.population_confidence(voter_list=[...])
# Or pass your own data
import pandas as pd
df = pd.read_csv("my_votes.csv")
gj.analytics.vote_histogram(df)
gj.analytics.votes_distribution(df)
Enroll in Benchmarks
List and enroll your model in open benchmarks programmatically:
# Browse available benchmarks
benchmarks = gj.benchmarks.list()
# Enroll with endpoint config
gj.benchmarks.enroll(
benchmark_id="...",
model_id="...",
endpoint_config={
"endpoint": "https://api.myapp.com/v1/chat/completions",
"apiKey": "sk-...",
"request_template": '{"model":"gpt-4o","messages":[{"role":"user","content":"{{prompt}}"}]}',
"response_path": "choices[0].message.content"
}
)
Analytics Methods
All analytics methods work on both platform data (gj.results(detail='votes')) and offline data (pandas/polars/CSV/parquet):
| Method | Description |
|---|---|
gj.analytics.evaluate_model() |
Decay-adjusted scoring |
gj.analytics.vote_histogram() |
Vote time distribution |
gj.analytics.vote_completeness() |
Completeness per voter |
gj.analytics.population_confidence() |
Confidence metrics |
gj.analytics.majority_good_votes() |
Threshold analysis |
gj.analytics.votes_distribution() |
Votes per inference |
Privacy
gj.results()only returns traces with at least 1 human vote (privacy gate)- Zero-vote traces are invisible to the SDK — only visible on the web dashboard
- Reviewer identity is public (consistent with platform's public profile/leaderboard model)
API Reference
gj = GrandJury(
api_key=None, # reads GRANDJURY_API_KEY from env if not provided
base_url="https://grandjury-server.onrender.com",
timeout=5.0,
)
# Write
gj.trace(name, input, output, model, latency_ms, metadata, gj_inference_id)
await gj.atrace(...) # async version (requires httpx)
gj.observe(name, model, metadata) # decorator
gj.span(name, input, model, metadata) # context manager
# Read
gj.results(detail=None, evaluation=None) # returns DataFrame or list[dict]
# Browse
gj.models.list()
gj.models.get(model_id)
gj.benchmarks.list()
gj.benchmarks.enroll(benchmark_id, model_id, endpoint_config)
# Analytics
gj.analytics.evaluate_model(...)
gj.analytics.vote_histogram(data=None, ...)
gj.analytics.vote_completeness(data=None, voter_list=None, ...)
gj.analytics.population_confidence(data=None, voter_list=None, ...)
gj.analytics.majority_good_votes(data=None, ...)
gj.analytics.votes_distribution(data=None, ...)
Contributing
See CONTRIBUTING.md for development setup, testing, and PR guidelines.
License
See LICENSE.
推荐服务器
Baidu Map
百度地图核心API现已全面兼容MCP协议,是国内首家兼容MCP协议的地图服务商。
Playwright MCP Server
一个模型上下文协议服务器,它使大型语言模型能够通过结构化的可访问性快照与网页进行交互,而无需视觉模型或屏幕截图。
Magic Component Platform (MCP)
一个由人工智能驱动的工具,可以从自然语言描述生成现代化的用户界面组件,并与流行的集成开发环境(IDE)集成,从而简化用户界面开发流程。
Audiense Insights MCP Server
通过模型上下文协议启用与 Audiense Insights 账户的交互,从而促进营销洞察和受众数据的提取和分析,包括人口统计信息、行为和影响者互动。
VeyraX
一个单一的 MCP 工具,连接你所有喜爱的工具:Gmail、日历以及其他 40 多个工具。
graphlit-mcp-server
模型上下文协议 (MCP) 服务器实现了 MCP 客户端与 Graphlit 服务之间的集成。 除了网络爬取之外,还可以将任何内容(从 Slack 到 Gmail 再到播客订阅源)导入到 Graphlit 项目中,然后从 MCP 客户端检索相关内容。
Kagi MCP Server
一个 MCP 服务器,集成了 Kagi 搜索功能和 Claude AI,使 Claude 能够在回答需要最新信息的问题时执行实时网络搜索。
e2b-mcp-server
使用 MCP 通过 e2b 运行代码。
Neon MCP Server
用于与 Neon 管理 API 和数据库交互的 MCP 服务器
Exa MCP Server
模型上下文协议(MCP)服务器允许像 Claude 这样的 AI 助手使用 Exa AI 搜索 API 进行网络搜索。这种设置允许 AI 模型以安全和受控的方式获取实时的网络信息。