IBAC FastMCP Demo
An MCP server that showcases intent-based access control and ReBAC with OpenFGA, providing team and salary listing tools protected by semantic and deterministic gates.
README
IBAC demo -- MCP tools behind an intent gate and an OpenFGA gate
A teaching demo for the DevOpsDays 2026 talk "ReBAC with OpenFGA". An MCP
server exposes two tools, list_team and list_salaries (the slide deck
writes them as list-team / list-salaries; same things, fake data). Every
call has to get past two gates:
request (x-api-key, x-user-intent)
-> identity extraction naive, on purpose
-> Gate 1 IntentGate does this call serve what the human asked for?
-> Gate 2 FgaGate does a tuple grant can_use on this tool?
-> tool handler
Gate 1 is semantic and probabilistic, Gate 2 deterministic. The order matters: an agent that legitimately holds a permission can still be stopped at Gate 1 when something talks it into using that permission off-task.
Run it
Pre-pull once, on a network that likes you:
docker pull openfga/openfga python:3.12-slim
Then:
make up # build the image, start OpenFGA
make init # create the store, start the server
make demo # the acceptance table
make attack # the money shot
make help lists the rest. Everything runs in containers -- there is no second
way to run this.
Demo it with a real agent
opencode.json points opencode at the server as an MCP
client, once per persona -- each entry pins a different x-api-key and
x-user-intent, so the agent picks a caller by picking a toolset:
| entry | identity | stated intent |
|---|---|---|
ceo |
ceo-bot-key | show me the team roster |
ceo-payroll |
ceo-bot-key | show me executive salaries |
stranger |
random-stranger | show me the team roster |
magma |
magma-grunt-01 | show me the team roster and the salaries |
aqua |
archie | salary review for finance |
opencode run "use the ceo tools to list the team" # allowed
opencode run "use the ceo tools to list their salaries" # blocked at gate 1
That config also denies the agent bash and edit, which is not cosmetic. Run
it without those denials and a blocked agent will rewrite x-user-intent in
the config and call the server with curl instead -- observed, not hypothetical.
The intent header is self-asserted, exactly like the API key. Gate 1 defends
against an agent that is manipulated; it does not defend against an agent
that is itself adversarial.
The storyline
| stage | command | what changes | the beat in the talk |
|---|---|---|---|
| V0 | make init |
model_v0 + 2 tuples | "We're done adding code." One agent, two tools, done. |
| V1 | make magma |
model_v1 + 13 tuples (1 userset + 12 members) | Magma shows up with twelve agents. One tuple grants the whole org list_team, twelve put the grunts in the org. |
| V2 | make aqua |
3 tuples, model untouched | Aqua shows up. No schema change needed -- the model already said what it needed to say. |
The authorization model is written exactly twice in the whole story and never again. OpenFGA keeps both versions in the store.
models/ holds each version twice: .fga is the DSL the slides show, .json
is what the API accepts and what setup_fga.py sends. They are equivalent --
fga model transform --file models/model_v1.fga reproduces the JSON.
make explain shows the difference between a model and a tuple on a throwaway
store: the same userset tuple rejected under model_v0 and accepted under
model_v1, and can_use answering checks while never being stored.
V1 writes zero tuples for list_salaries. Nobody wrote a deny rule, and
the twelve Magma agents still cannot read salaries. That is default-deny doing
the work.
Scenario 7 is the point of the demo. ceo-bot-key genuinely holds
can_use on list_salaries -- scenario 2 proves it. Ask it for the team
roster, then make it reach for salaries anyway:
$ make attack
BLOCKED at gate 1 (intent)
403 intent mismatch: tool list_salaries does not serve stated intent: 'show me the team roster'
Permissions alone would have allowed that call. Intent is what caught it.
Gate 1's judge is a keyword map by default, so the demo has no network
dependency. INTENT_BACKEND=anthropic|ollama swaps in a real model, and both
fail closed. See .env.example.
Verified against fastmcp 3.4.5, openfga-sdk 0.10.4, OpenFGA 1.18.1, Python 3.12, Docker 29.1.3 / Compose 2.40.3 on Ubuntu 24.04.
推荐服务器
Baidu Map
百度地图核心API现已全面兼容MCP协议,是国内首家兼容MCP协议的地图服务商。
Playwright MCP Server
一个模型上下文协议服务器,它使大型语言模型能够通过结构化的可访问性快照与网页进行交互,而无需视觉模型或屏幕截图。
Magic Component Platform (MCP)
一个由人工智能驱动的工具,可以从自然语言描述生成现代化的用户界面组件,并与流行的集成开发环境(IDE)集成,从而简化用户界面开发流程。
Audiense Insights MCP Server
通过模型上下文协议启用与 Audiense Insights 账户的交互,从而促进营销洞察和受众数据的提取和分析,包括人口统计信息、行为和影响者互动。
VeyraX
一个单一的 MCP 工具,连接你所有喜爱的工具:Gmail、日历以及其他 40 多个工具。
graphlit-mcp-server
模型上下文协议 (MCP) 服务器实现了 MCP 客户端与 Graphlit 服务之间的集成。 除了网络爬取之外,还可以将任何内容(从 Slack 到 Gmail 再到播客订阅源)导入到 Graphlit 项目中,然后从 MCP 客户端检索相关内容。
Kagi MCP Server
一个 MCP 服务器,集成了 Kagi 搜索功能和 Claude AI,使 Claude 能够在回答需要最新信息的问题时执行实时网络搜索。
e2b-mcp-server
使用 MCP 通过 e2b 运行代码。
Neon MCP Server
用于与 Neon 管理 API 和数据库交互的 MCP 服务器
Exa MCP Server
模型上下文协议(MCP)服务器允许像 Claude 这样的 AI 助手使用 Exa AI 搜索 API 进行网络搜索。这种设置允许 AI 模型以安全和受控的方式获取实时的网络信息。