ichnus2
Enables bug localization by analyzing a repo and bug report with an ant-swarm LLM, returning a HOT/WARM/COLD heatmap and JSON audit trail via MCP.
README
<p align="center"> <img src="assets/readme/01-hero.svg" width="1000" alt="Ichnus" /> </p>
Ichnus is a stigmergic ant-swarm for bug localization. Isolated LLM ants score one file each against a bug report, deposit confidence-weighted heat onto a shared board, and spread it along the import graph with hop decay.
A median-of-3 pass catches random noise. A prosecutor / judge catches confidently wrong answers. You get a HOT / WARM / COLD markdown heatmap plus a full JSON audit trail — callable from Claude Code via MCP.
uv sync
ICHNOS_MOCK=0 uv run python -m ichnos2.demo_runner /path/to/repo \
"query string drops the first parameter" ""
Why it exists
Grepping a bug description finds similar code. Agents that read the whole repo burn tokens and still guess. Ichnus treats localization as a swarm search with a hard spend ceiling:
- Ants never talk to each other — they only write the board (O(A) cost, not O(A²))
- Heat propagates along real import edges, so neighbours of a hot file get scouted next
- Total ant spend is bounded — wave i uses
A0 / 2^i, so spend stays< 2 · A0 - Two verifiers, two failure modes — median-of-3 for random noise; prosecutor/judge for confidently wrong answers
Architecture
System
<p align="center"> <img src="assets/readme/04-system.svg" width="1000" alt="System architecture" /> </p>
Pipeline
<p align="center"> <img src="assets/readme/05-pipeline.svg" width="1000" alt="Pipeline" /> </p>
Stigmergy
<p align="center"> <img src="assets/readme/06-stigmergy.svg" width="1000" alt="Stigmergy loop" /> </p>
Ant-scored heat is a measurement and never evaporates. Propagated heat is a hypothesis and does. Recruitment makes this a swarm instead of a fixed ranked list: the next wave follows the trail.
Verification
<p align="center"> <img src="assets/readme/07-verify.svg" width="1000" alt="Verification" /> </p>
Stage 7 catches random variance. Stage 8 catches systematic error — a model that is confidently wrong every time. Median-of-3 cannot fix that; changing the question can.
Quick start
Requires Python 3.11+ and uv.
git clone https://github.com/Sharann-del/Ichnus.git
cd Ichnus
uv sync
Offline demo (no API key)
uv run python -m ichnos2.demo_runner /path/to/repo \
"login fails with empty password" ""
Live run
Put a key in .env (never commit it):
GEMINI_API_KEY=...
# or
OPENROUTER_API_KEY=...
Then set mock mode explicitly whenever a key is present:
ICHNOS_MOCK=0 uv run python -m ichnos2.demo_runner /path/to/repo \
"bug description" "optional stack trace"
| Variable | Purpose |
|---|---|
ICHNOS_MOCK |
1 offline mock · 0 real LLM calls (required when a key is set) |
ICHNOS_PROVIDER |
gemini or openrouter (else inferred from which key exists) |
ICHNOS_ANT_MODEL |
Override the default cheap scout model |
ICHNOS_STIGMERGY |
1 trail-following (default) · 0 static ranking A/B |
ICHNOS_DEBUG_ANTS |
1 print client + raw text for the first few ants |
ICHNOS_PROSECUTOR_MODEL |
Optional separate model for Stage 8 |
Gemini free tier is the practical default for multi-ant waves. OpenRouter’s free quota is easy to exhaust on a mid-size repo; Ichnus fails fast with the reset time rather than spinning on a spent daily limit.
Tests
uv run pytest tests/test_algorithm.py -v
98 tests, no network required.
MCP (Claude Code / any MCP client)
.mcp.json in the project root:
{
"mcpServers": {
"ichnus2": {
"type": "stdio",
"command": "uv",
"args": ["run", "python3", "-m", "ichnos2.mcp_server"],
"env": {
"ICHNOS_MOCK": "0",
"ICHNOS_PROVIDER": "gemini"
}
}
}
}
Tool: locate_bug_tool(repo_path, bug_description, stack_trace="")
Returns the same markdown heatmap as the CLI. Audit JSON lands at <repo>/.ichnos2/last_audit.json.
uv run python -m ichnos2.mcp_server
# or
uv run ichnos2-mcp
What you get
Markdown heatmap — HOT / WARM / COLD bands with scores, reasons, line ranges, and verification notes.
JSON audit — full board state, ant verdicts, cache provenance, and demotion history under .ichnos2/.
The heatmap is a suggestion for where to read next, not a verdict. Keep using normal file tools after.
How a wave spends budget
Wave i scouts roughly A0 / 2^i files. Across any finite number of waves:
total spend = A0 · (2 − 2^(1−n)) < 2 · A0
This is asserted in the test suite (test_total_budget_bound_proof), not just documented.
Tests and example apps are excluded from scouting by default. A path named in a stack trace is always kept.
Verified results
Measured on this codebase — not invented:
| Check | Result |
|---|---|
| Test suite | 98 passed |
| Express real bug (prose symptom, no stack) | lib/request.js HOT 10.0, lines 230–241 (defect on 238) in 4/4 cold-cache Gemini runs, ~5–7s |
| Seeded Python bug via OpenRouter | Culprit HOT, defect line pinned; Stage 8 upheld |
| Mock e2e | Stage 8 overturns a planted confident decoy |
| MCP stdio | locate_bug_tool returns the heatmap end-to-end |
| Stage 1 recall (tiny synthetic sample) | 0.8 (4/5) |
Design choices that matter
- Confidence-weighted deposit — ranking uses
relevance × confidence - Hop decay —
γ^hopfrom the nearest ant-sourced HOT file; cycle-safe BFS - Bounded demotion — never below
floor × peak - Provenance-aware cache — mock and live scores never poison each other
- Rate-limit aware client — per-minute limits waited out; daily quota stops the run
- Overlapping file windows — strongest finding wins (averaging dilutes the truth)
Limitations
- Accuracy is solidly shown on one real bug (Express) plus synthetics — not a broad hit-rate study
- Ants read one file at a time; they cannot run a repro or reason about whole-repo architecture
- Non-Python import edges are regex-based; only Python uses AST for authoritative contradictions
- “Embedding” similarity in Stage 1 is a bag-of-words TF cosine proxy, not a neural embedding
- Live mode sends file contents to Gemini or OpenRouter — no local-model path yet
- Free-tier quotas can make “fast” and “works” mutually exclusive
Project layout
ichnos2/
locate_bug.py
candidate_filter.py
budget.py / priority.py
ants.py
board.py
reliability.py
verify.py
aggregate.py
llm_client.py
mcp_server.py
demo_runner.py
tests/
test_algorithm.py
License
MIT © 2026 Sharann Manojkumar
推荐服务器
Baidu Map
百度地图核心API现已全面兼容MCP协议,是国内首家兼容MCP协议的地图服务商。
Playwright MCP Server
一个模型上下文协议服务器,它使大型语言模型能够通过结构化的可访问性快照与网页进行交互,而无需视觉模型或屏幕截图。
Magic Component Platform (MCP)
一个由人工智能驱动的工具,可以从自然语言描述生成现代化的用户界面组件,并与流行的集成开发环境(IDE)集成,从而简化用户界面开发流程。
Audiense Insights MCP Server
通过模型上下文协议启用与 Audiense Insights 账户的交互,从而促进营销洞察和受众数据的提取和分析,包括人口统计信息、行为和影响者互动。
VeyraX
一个单一的 MCP 工具,连接你所有喜爱的工具:Gmail、日历以及其他 40 多个工具。
graphlit-mcp-server
模型上下文协议 (MCP) 服务器实现了 MCP 客户端与 Graphlit 服务之间的集成。 除了网络爬取之外,还可以将任何内容(从 Slack 到 Gmail 再到播客订阅源)导入到 Graphlit 项目中,然后从 MCP 客户端检索相关内容。
Kagi MCP Server
一个 MCP 服务器,集成了 Kagi 搜索功能和 Claude AI,使 Claude 能够在回答需要最新信息的问题时执行实时网络搜索。
e2b-mcp-server
使用 MCP 通过 e2b 运行代码。
Neon MCP Server
用于与 Neon 管理 API 和数据库交互的 MCP 服务器
Exa MCP Server
模型上下文协议(MCP)服务器允许像 Claude 这样的 AI 助手使用 Exa AI 搜索 API 进行网络搜索。这种设置允许 AI 模型以安全和受控的方式获取实时的网络信息。