jira-mcp
A token-lean MCP server for Jira Cloud that enables natural language interaction with issues, comments, transitions, and more through a set of seven normalized tools, reducing token usage via field allowlists and ADF-to-Markdown conversion.
README
jira-mcp
A token-lean MCP server in front of Jira Cloud. Seven tools, normalized text responses, ADF descriptions converted to Markdown.
Why
The official Atlassian MCP servers register ~45 tools and return raw REST JSON:
self URLs, avatarUrls in four sizes, iconUrl on every status and priority,
statusCategory sub-objects, and descriptions as Atlassian Document Format —
a JSON tree where a paragraph of text costs several hundred tokens.
This adapter does four things about that:
| Field allowlists | Asks Jira for seven fields, not *navigable. Biggest single win, and it happens before a byte crosses the wire. |
| Collapsed objects | status.name, not the twelve-key status object. |
| ADF → Markdown | Via marklas. ~2.5–3.9x on body text. |
| Acks, not echoes | PROJ-443 updated, not the whole issue re-serialized. |
Measure it against your own issues rather than trusting those numbers — see Measuring.
Requirements
- A Jira Cloud site and an API token from https://id.atlassian.com/manage-profile/security/api-tokens
- Docker, or Python 3.12+
Quickstart
git clone https://github.com/jack-oval-traits/jira-mcp
cd jira-mcp
cp .env.example .env
Fill in four values in .env:
| Variable | |
|---|---|
JIRA_BASE_URL |
your site, e.g. https://your-org.atlassian.net — but see Scoped tokens |
JIRA_EMAIL |
the account the API token belongs to |
JIRA_API_TOKEN |
from the link above |
JIRA_MCP_TOKEN |
shared secret clients present — openssl rand -hex 32 |
Then:
docker compose up -d --build
curl -fsS http://127.0.0.1:8787/healthz # -> ok
That's the whole setup. Nothing external is required — no pre-created networks, no other compose projects.
Scoped API tokens
Atlassian issues two kinds of API token, and they do not accept the same URL:
| Token | JIRA_BASE_URL |
|---|---|
| classic (no scopes) | https://your-org.atlassian.net |
| scoped | https://api.atlassian.com/ex/jira/<cloudId> |
A scoped token sent to a site URL fails in the worst available way: it is not
rejected, it is ignored. Jira answers as if you were logged out, and since
anonymous users can see no issues, search_issues returns No matching issues.
— which reads exactly like an empty project.
So the server checks GET /rest/api/3/myself at startup and refuses to serve on
a 401, printing the gateway URL for your site. If you need the cloud id yourself:
curl -s https://your-org.atlassian.net/_edge/tenant_info
A scoped token also needs read:jira-work and write:jira-work; without them
the same call returns 403 and startup fails the same way.
Without Docker
uv pip install -e .
set -a && . ./.env && set +a
jira-mcp # listens on 127.0.0.1:8787
Connecting a client
For Claude Code:
claude mcp add --transport http jira http://127.0.0.1:8787/mcp \
--header "Authorization: Bearer $JIRA_MCP_TOKEN"
Any MCP client that speaks streamable HTTP works the same way: point it at
/mcp and send the bearer token in an Authorization header.
If you already have a full Atlassian MCP server registered, remove it — the savings come from removal, not addition. Two servers exposing the same Jira means both tool sets land in the context window:
claude mcp remove <your-atlassian-server-name>
Keep one around if you need Confluence, Bitbucket, or JSM Ops; this adapter covers Jira issues only.
Tools
| Tool | Returns |
|---|---|
search_issues(jql, limit, page_token) |
one line per issue, no descriptions |
get_issue(key) |
full issue, description as Markdown |
get_comments(key, limit) |
comments as Markdown, newest first |
create_issue(summary, description, issue_type, project, labels) |
PROJ-501 created |
update_issue(key, summary, description, labels, assignee) |
PROJ-443 updated: summary |
add_comment(key, body) |
PROJ-443 commented |
transition_issue(key, status) |
PROJ-443 -> Done, or lists options |
Markdown goes in and comes out; the adapter converts to and from ADF at the boundary.
search_issues returns lines shaped like:
PROJ-443 | Bug | In Progress | High | Jane Doe | 2026-08-03 | Roster import crashes on duplicate jersey
Set JIRA_DEFAULT_PROJECT in .env and create_issue can omit the project.
Configuration
Everything is environment variables; .env.example documents each one.
| Variable | Default | |
|---|---|---|
JIRA_BASE_URL |
— | required; site URL, or the gateway for a scoped token |
JIRA_EMAIL |
— | required |
JIRA_API_TOKEN |
— | required |
JIRA_MCP_TOKEN |
— | required, the client-facing bearer |
JIRA_DEFAULT_PROJECT |
— | fallback project for create_issue |
JIRA_MCP_BIND_ADDRESS |
127.0.0.1 |
host side of the published port |
JIRA_MCP_PORT |
8787 |
host side of the published port |
JIRA_MCP_LISTEN |
127.0.0.1 |
what the process itself binds; the image sets 0.0.0.0 |
JIRA_MCP_HOST |
— | public hostname, when behind a proxy |
JIRA_MCP_ALLOWED_HOSTS |
— | extra Host values to accept, comma-separated |
JIRA_MCP_STARTUP_CHECK |
on |
off skips the startup credential probe (CI, smoke tests) |
JIRA_MCP_MEASURE |
off | log per-call token counts — see Measuring |
LOG_LEVEL |
info |
Missing required variables fail at startup, not on the first tool call — as do
credentials Jira turns down, which costs one round-trip to /myself per boot.
JIRA_MCP_STARTUP_CHECK=off skips that probe — and with it the scoped-token
diagnosis above — for environments with no Jira reachable, like CI.
Behind a reverse proxy
To serve this on a hostname with TLS, layer the optional overlay on top of the base compose file:
docker network create web # if the proxy's network doesn't exist
echo 'JIRA_MCP_HOST=jira-mcp.example.com' >> .env
echo 'PROXY_NETWORK=web' >> .env
docker compose -f compose.yaml -f compose.proxy.yaml up -d --build
The overlay joins an existing external network so the proxy can reach the
container as jira-mcp:8787. With Caddy:
jira-mcp.example.com {
reverse_proxy jira-mcp:8787
}
JIRA_MCP_HOST has to be set for the server too, not just the proxy — the MCP
SDK enables DNS-rebinding protection with an empty allowlist, so any hostname it
should answer to must be named explicitly. See _allowed_hosts in server.py.
Measuring
Runs the same JQL as a naive client and as this adapter, and counts both:
docker compose run --rm --entrypoint python jira-mcp \
scripts/token_compare.py 'project = PROJ ORDER BY updated DESC' 6
Counting uses tiktoken, a GPT tokenizer, so absolute numbers are approximate for Claude. The ratio is the point.
Against real traffic
That script is a one-off against a synthetic second query. To track the same
thing continuously, set JIRA_MCP_MEASURE=1 and recreate the container. Every
tool call then prints one JSON record — jira.py holds Jira's response before
normalize.py shapes it, so both halves are there without a second request:
{"measure":"tool_call","tool":"search_issues","raw_tokens":8756,"out_tokens":523,
"jira_calls":1,"ms":760.6,"arg":"project = PROJ ORDER BY updated DESC","saved":0.94}
Read them back with:
docker logs jira-mcp-jira-mcp-1 2>&1 | python3 scripts/measure_report.py
tool calls from jira sent saved median
--------------------------------------------------------------
search_issues 1 8,756 523 94.0% 761ms
get_issue 1 3,662 828 77.4% 184ms
get_comments 1 18 8 55.6% 155ms
--------------------------------------------------------------
all 3 12,436 1,359 89.1% 184ms
11,077 tokens not spent across 3 calls.
Reduction is weighted by size, not averaged per call — one 9k-token search and one 8-token ack should not count equally toward the headline.
These numbers are smaller than the script's, and deliberately so.
raw_tokens is what Jira sent for the fields this adapter asked for. The
allowlist — the biggest single win — has already been applied by then, upstream
of anything measurable here, so what these records show is the shaping alone:
collapsing, ADF→Markdown, one line per issue. token_compare.py measures
against fields=*navigable, which is why it reports ~99% where this reports
~94%. Both are true; they answer different questions. Measuring the
counterfactual continuously would mean issuing every request twice.
It is off by default for two reasons: encoding every response costs a few ms, and the records carry JQL and issue keys into wherever stdout goes. Records survive only as long as the container's logs, so redirect them somewhere if you want history.
Layout
src/jira_mcp/
server.py tool definitions, bearer auth, uvicorn wiring
jira.py async REST v3 client — takes field allowlists, returns raw JSON
normalize.py all shaping lives here: allowlists, collapsing, ADF conversion
measure.py optional per-call token accounting, off unless asked for
scripts/
token_compare.py
measure_report.py
tests/
test_normalize.py
test_credentials.py
test_measure.py
normalize.py is the file to edit when a response is still too fat, or when a
field you need got allowlisted out.
uv pip install -e ".[dev]"
pytest -q
ruff check .
Security
The adapter authenticates to Jira with Basic auth (email + API token), so it acts as you: it has your permissions and its writes carry your name. The bearer token is the only thing between the network and that Jira token, and four of the seven tools write.
Bind to loopback unless something in front terminates TLS. /healthz is
deliberately unauthenticated; everything else is not. See
SECURITY.md.
Notes
- Uses
POST /rest/api/3/search/jql, the token-paginated replacement for the removed/rest/api/3/search. There is no total count;search_issuesreports a page token when more results exist. - Requires MCP SDK 2.x — the server class is
MCPServerthere andFastMCPon 1.x, so the pin inpyproject.tomlis load-bearing.
License
MIT — see LICENSE.
推荐服务器
Baidu Map
百度地图核心API现已全面兼容MCP协议,是国内首家兼容MCP协议的地图服务商。
Playwright MCP Server
一个模型上下文协议服务器,它使大型语言模型能够通过结构化的可访问性快照与网页进行交互,而无需视觉模型或屏幕截图。
Magic Component Platform (MCP)
一个由人工智能驱动的工具,可以从自然语言描述生成现代化的用户界面组件,并与流行的集成开发环境(IDE)集成,从而简化用户界面开发流程。
Audiense Insights MCP Server
通过模型上下文协议启用与 Audiense Insights 账户的交互,从而促进营销洞察和受众数据的提取和分析,包括人口统计信息、行为和影响者互动。
VeyraX
一个单一的 MCP 工具,连接你所有喜爱的工具:Gmail、日历以及其他 40 多个工具。
graphlit-mcp-server
模型上下文协议 (MCP) 服务器实现了 MCP 客户端与 Graphlit 服务之间的集成。 除了网络爬取之外,还可以将任何内容(从 Slack 到 Gmail 再到播客订阅源)导入到 Graphlit 项目中,然后从 MCP 客户端检索相关内容。
Kagi MCP Server
一个 MCP 服务器,集成了 Kagi 搜索功能和 Claude AI,使 Claude 能够在回答需要最新信息的问题时执行实时网络搜索。
e2b-mcp-server
使用 MCP 通过 e2b 运行代码。
Neon MCP Server
用于与 Neon 管理 API 和数据库交互的 MCP 服务器
Exa MCP Server
模型上下文协议(MCP)服务器允许像 Claude 这样的 AI 助手使用 Exa AI 搜索 API 进行网络搜索。这种设置允许 AI 模型以安全和受控的方式获取实时的网络信息。