juniper-junos-mcp
Enables safe interaction with Juniper Junos devices (SRX firewalls) via MCP, providing operational read tools and a configuration change flow with device-side diff preview and automated rollback.
README
juniper-junos-mcp
An MCP server that exposes Juniper Junos devices — SRX firewalls in particular — as tools an LLM client can call. Named operational reads, plus a configuration-change path that previews the device's own diff, commits behind a rollback timer, verifies the box still answers, and only then confirms.
It speaks MCP over Streamable HTTP, so it runs as its own service on the
network rather than as a local subprocess of one client. Transport to the device
is NETCONF over SSH, via junos-eznc.
Built for universal-network-director,
a chat-driven multi-vendor network manager with a human approval gate on every
write — but it is a standalone MCP server and works with any MCP client.
Not affiliated with, endorsed by, or supported by Juniper Networks. "Juniper", "Junos" and "SRX" are trademarks of their respective owners and are used here only to describe what this software talks to.
The safety model
A router's configuration is not a set of narrow API calls, so this doesn't pretend it is. Two things make config changes survivable, and neither is the model:
1. The diff comes from the device, not from the model
preview_config_change loads your set lines into a candidate
configuration and returns the device's own show | compare output. That's the
router telling you what would actually change, given its current state — not the
model's account of what it intended. You approve that.
write_apply_previewed_config then takes only a preview id. It cannot
commit anything that was not previewed, and the preview is re-validated against
the device before it commits: if the running config moved underneath you, the
apply fails closed rather than committing a stale diff. Previews expire
(JUNOSGW_PREVIEW_TTL, default 30 minutes), and an expired one fails with
"unknown or expired preview" so you re-preview against current state.
2. A change that severs management reverts itself
The apply is commit confirmed <n>: live immediately, but Junos rolls it back
automatically unless a confirming commit arrives within n minutes (1–60,
default 5). This server then reconnects on a new session to check the device
still answers, and sends the confirming commit only if it does. Lock yourself
out and the box undoes the change on its own.
What this does not protect
Reads are bounded by construction — every operational read runs a command this
server chose, so the model picks a tool, never a command. Config changes
are not bounded that way: the model writes the set lines. What protects that
side is the diff coming from the device and the auto-revert, not the tool
surface. Read the diff.
Read this before you point it at production
Two of the fifteen tools change state, and this server does not ask before
executing them. There is no confirmation step here — the write_ prefix is a
convention so your client can gate them.
| Tool | What it does | Risk |
|---|---|---|
write_clear_ipsec_sa |
Tears down one IPsec SA by index, forcing renegotiation | Traffic over that tunnel stops until it re-establishes. Changes no configuration. |
write_apply_previewed_config |
Commits a previously previewed change | Whatever the diff said. Behind commit confirmed with an auto-revert, but a bad policy is live for the length of the timer. |
Note the asymmetry the prefix encodes: write_ means "a human must approve
this", not "this edits the configuration". write_clear_ipsec_sa edits nothing
and is gated because traffic stops when it runs. Junos itself draws the line
between configuration and operational state; the approval gate draws it around
consequences.
There is deliberately no free-form command tool. Every operational read has its command fixed here, so there is no guessed syntax and no approval spent on a command that was never going to work. An unnamed operation gets "I have no tool for that" — which is the signal for what to build next, not a gap to paper over with a shell.
Scope the device account read-only unless you specifically intend the writes to work. That control lives on the device, not in this code, and it is the one that holds regardless of what any model or client decides.
The MCP endpoint has no authentication
This server exposes its tools to anyone who can reach its port. There is no token, no client auth, no TLS on the MCP side.
MCP_HOST defaults to 127.0.0.1 for that reason. The container image sets
0.0.0.0 because it has to, which means publishing the container's port puts
an unauthenticated path to your firewalls on that interface. Keep it on an
internal network with the client, or terminate TLS and authentication in front
of it.
Device inventory
Device credentials live in a JSON file mounted read-only into the container —
never baked into the image, never committed. It holds plaintext SSH
credentials, so chmod 600 it and own it as the uid the container runs as.
{
"srx-edge": {
"ip": "192.0.2.10",
"port": 22,
"username": "automation",
"auth": { "type": "password", "password": "..." }
},
"srx-branch": {
"ip": "192.0.2.11",
"username": "automation",
"auth": { "type": "ssh_key", "private_key_path": "/app/config/id_ed25519" }
}
}
port defaults to 22. auth.type is password or ssh_key; a flat
"password": "..." at the top level is also accepted for compatibility with the
format this inherited. The keys of the object are the names list_devices
returns and every other tool takes as device — no credential is ever exposed
through a tool result.
Container uid. The image creates a uid-1000 passwd entry deliberately. OpenSSH refuses to run when the calling uid has no
/etc/passwdentry, and the symptom is a misleading "EOF reading from transport" rather than anything naming the real cause.
Running it
docker build -t juniper-junos-mcp .
docker run --rm \
-v "$PWD/secrets/devices.json:/app/config/devices.json:ro" \
--user 1000:1000 \
-p 127.0.0.1:8003:8003 \
juniper-junos-mcp
| Variable | Default | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
JUNOS_DEVICES_FILE |
/app/config/devices.json |
Device inventory path |
JUNOSGW_PREVIEW_TTL |
1800 |
Seconds a preview stays applicable |
MCP_HOST |
127.0.0.1 |
Bind address (the image sets 0.0.0.0) |
MCP_PORT |
8003 |
Bind port |
Tests
docker run --rm juniper-junos-mcp python test_arg_validation.py
Offline argument-validation checks — no device contact, no credentials needed.
Tool reference
TOOLS.md has the tool-by-tool reference: arguments, what each one
returns, and which of them need approval.
License
Apache-2.0. See LICENSE.
推荐服务器
Baidu Map
百度地图核心API现已全面兼容MCP协议,是国内首家兼容MCP协议的地图服务商。
Playwright MCP Server
一个模型上下文协议服务器,它使大型语言模型能够通过结构化的可访问性快照与网页进行交互,而无需视觉模型或屏幕截图。
Magic Component Platform (MCP)
一个由人工智能驱动的工具,可以从自然语言描述生成现代化的用户界面组件,并与流行的集成开发环境(IDE)集成,从而简化用户界面开发流程。
Audiense Insights MCP Server
通过模型上下文协议启用与 Audiense Insights 账户的交互,从而促进营销洞察和受众数据的提取和分析,包括人口统计信息、行为和影响者互动。
VeyraX
一个单一的 MCP 工具,连接你所有喜爱的工具:Gmail、日历以及其他 40 多个工具。
graphlit-mcp-server
模型上下文协议 (MCP) 服务器实现了 MCP 客户端与 Graphlit 服务之间的集成。 除了网络爬取之外,还可以将任何内容(从 Slack 到 Gmail 再到播客订阅源)导入到 Graphlit 项目中,然后从 MCP 客户端检索相关内容。
Kagi MCP Server
一个 MCP 服务器,集成了 Kagi 搜索功能和 Claude AI,使 Claude 能够在回答需要最新信息的问题时执行实时网络搜索。
e2b-mcp-server
使用 MCP 通过 e2b 运行代码。
Neon MCP Server
用于与 Neon 管理 API 和数据库交互的 MCP 服务器
Exa MCP Server
模型上下文协议(MCP)服务器允许像 Claude 这样的 AI 助手使用 Exa AI 搜索 API 进行网络搜索。这种设置允许 AI 模型以安全和受控的方式获取实时的网络信息。