lever-mcp-server

lever-mcp-server

Enables Claude to interact with the Lever ATS for candidate management, interviews, feedback, and more, using OAuth with Google Workspace for Samba employees.

Category
访问服务器

README

Lever MCP Server

A remote Model Context Protocol server exposing the Lever ATS API as tools callable from Claude. Built on Express + GCP Cloud Run. v3 target auth: the server is its own OAuth 2.1 Authorization Server brokering Google Workspace sign-in restricted to @samba.tv (no Auth0 in the login path — mirrors the MSCI MCP).

Canonical architecture spec: system-design.md (404 lines, 13 sections — current state, target architecture, multi-tenant auth model, MCP spec 2025-11-25 compliance, operational runbook, decision log).

Refactor tracking: ATF-476 on Jira · Confluence hub.


What this is

When a Samba employee asks Claude to "check the candidate status for X" or "submit my interview feedback for Y," Claude calls this MCP server. The server validates the user's OAuth token, resolves their authenticated email to a Lever user record (multi-tenant perform_as model — see system-design.md §4), and forwards the request to the Lever REST API with proper audit attribution.

Status (as of 2026-05-27): Single-tenant mode. All write operations attribute to LEVER_DEFAULT_USER_ID (Sid). Per-user perform_as resolution lands in M3b — JWT validation and email logging are live today, but the email→Lever user ID resolver is not yet wired. Read operations are unaffected.

Live endpoint: https://lever-mcp-201626763325.us-central1.run.app/mcp

Tool count: 17 live tools across search, candidate management, applications/files, interviews, requisitions, reference data, user lookup, and 5 action-enum tools (notes, feedback, archive, stages, requisitions). See Tools below.


Architecture

Claude (MCP client)
   │ treats this server as the OAuth 2.1 AS; self-registers via DCR (/register),
   │ runs PKCE S256 against our /authorize + /token
   ▼
Lever MCP Server (this repo, GCP Cloud Run us-central1) — acts as the AS
   │ /authorize → redirects to Google (hd=samba.tv, prompt=select_account)
   │ /oauth/google/callback → validates Google ID token (RS256, iss, hd==samba.tv),
   │   mints an opaque Bearer token ↔ the user's email
   │ every /mcp request: validate opaque token → resolve email
   │ → resolve email → Lever user ID (perform-as-resolver, TTL cache) — **M3b, pending**
   │ → attach resolved user ID as `perform_as` on writes
   ▼
Lever ATS REST API (api.lever.co/v1)

Stack:

Layer Choice
Language TypeScript (Node.js 20+)
HTTP server Express 4.21
MCP SDK @modelcontextprotocol/sdk 1.29
MCP transport Streamable HTTP
MCP-Protocol-Version 2025-06-18 (target: 2025-11-25 per M1.5)
JWT validation jose 6
Schema validation zod 3
Deploy target GCP Cloud Run, region us-central1
Auth OAuth 2.1 — self-hosted Google OAuth broker (Google Workspace IdP, @samba.tv)

See ARCHITECTURE.md for request-flow diagrams + auth-chain failure recovery procedures.


Prerequisites

  • Node.js 20+ and npm
  • GCP account with Cloud Run enabled (for deploy)
  • Lever API key with scopes for: opportunities, postings, users, stages, archive_reasons, feedback_templates, requisitions, feedback (read + write), interviews (write), notes (write), webhooks (read + write)
  • A Google OAuth 2.0 Web Client (for the auth broker) — self-serve setup in docs/google-oauth-setup.md

Install

git clone https://github.com/the-sid-dani/lever-mcp-server.git
cd lever-mcp-server
npm install

Local development

# Run local dev server (tsx watch, port 8080)
npm run dev

# Type check (no emit)
npm run type-check

# Run tests (vitest)
npm test

# Watch mode
npm run test:watch

# Format
npm run format

# Lint + autofix
npm run lint:fix

Set the required env vars locally (see .env.example for the full list):

export LEVER_API_KEY=<your-key>
export LEVER_DEFAULT_USER_ID=<your-lever-user-uuid>
export NODE_ENV=development

For the OAuth broker path during local dev, also set GOOGLE_OAUTH_CLIENT_ID, GOOGLE_OAUTH_CLIENT_SECRET, MCP_PUBLIC_URL, and ALLOWED_HOSTED_DOMAIN=samba.tv (see docs/google-oauth-setup.md). To bypass OAuth locally and use single-tenant fallback (server reads LEVER_DEFAULT_USER_ID for perform_as), set OAUTH_ENABLED=false.


Deploy

# Build + push container + deploy revision via Cloud Build + Cloud Run
npm run deploy

Behind the scenes: gcloud builds submit --config cloudbuild.yaml. Production environment variables are managed via Cloud Run service config (no .env file in production).

Rollback to a previous revision:

gcloud run revisions list --service lever-mcp --region us-central1
gcloud run services update-traffic lever-mcp \
  --to-revisions=<previous-revision>=100 \
  --region us-central1

Connect from Claude

Once the server is deployed and the Google OAuth client is configured, register the MCP server in Claude.ai (or Claude Code) using the standard remote MCP flow. Claude discovers this server as the OAuth AS, self-registers via DCR, and runs the PKCE auth code flow automatically. First connect prompts a Google login at @samba.tv and consents to the requested scopes.

Local dev / debugging:

# Install the MCP Inspector
npm install -g @modelcontextprotocol/inspector

# Run inspector against local dev server (OAUTH_ENABLED=false recommended)
npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspector
# Enter: http://localhost:8080/mcp

Tools

17 tools registered (post-consolidation). See system-design.md §8 for the canonical inventory.

Search & discovery (4)

lever_advanced_search, lever_search_candidates, lever_find_postings_by_owner, lever_list_open_roles

Candidate management (2)

lever_get_candidate, lever_update_candidate

Application / files / emails (3)

lever_list_applications, lever_list_files, lever_list_emails

Interview (2)

lever_manage_interview, lever_get_interview_insights

User lookup (1)

lever_get_users

Notes (1) — lever_notes(action)

  • action="list" — fetch all notes on a candidate
  • action="get" — fetch one note by id
  • action="add" — create a new note (single-tenant — attributed via LEVER_DEFAULT_USER_ID)

Feedback (1) — lever_feedback(action)

  • action="list_templates" — discover available feedback forms org-wide
  • action="list" — all feedback on a candidate
  • action="get" — one feedback form by id
  • action="submit" — submit a filled-out form (single-tenant — uses fieldValues[] write-shape per Lever API)

Archive (1) — lever_archive(action)

  • action="list_reasons" — discover valid archive reason IDs
  • action="archive" — archive a candidate
  • action="search" — query archived candidates by posting / date range / recruiter / reason

Stages (1) — lever_stages(action)

  • action="list" — fetch all pipeline stages
  • action="history" — stage-change history for a specific opportunity

Requisitions (1) — lever_requisitions(action)

  • action="list" — fetch requisitions with optional filters (status, code, date, confidentiality)
  • action="get" — fetch full details for one requisition by Lever UUID or external code (smart lookup)

Why action-enum tools?

Reduces schema-token overhead ~30-40% vs the prior 26-tool registry (consolidated 2026-05-27, commits 17951ea...71d999c). Same-resource operations share one tool, dispatched by action enum. Background: continuum/research/code-mode-vs-many-tools/findings.md.

Out of scope (future batches)

  • M5 write tools (lever_feedback(action="update")) — blocked on M3b multi-tenant perform_as resolver (fed by the Google OAuth broker; no IT dependency)
  • M6 webhook tools (lever_list_webhooks, lever_register_webhook, lever_delete_webhook) — same blocker

Project structure

src/
├── server.ts                 # Cloud Run entry, Express setup, MCP transport wiring
├── tools.ts                  # registerAllTools + 4 tool registrations (search, candidates, postings)
├── additional-tools.ts       # 11 tool registrations including 5 consolidated action-enum tools (split into src/tools/ in v3 M3a)
├── interview-tools.ts        # 2 interview-specific tool registrations
├── lever/
│   └── client.ts             # LeverClient — REST wrapper, rate limit, pagination
├── auth/
│   ├── middleware.ts         # JWT validation, OAUTH_ENABLED toggle, Cloud Run IAM fallback
│   ├── metadata.ts           # OAuth 2.0 Protected Resource Metadata endpoint
│   ├── constants.ts
│   ├── types.ts
│   └── index.ts
├── types/lever.ts            # Lever API response type definitions
└── utils/stage-helpers.ts

test-fixtures/lever-api/      # Probe captures (2026-05-22) + synthetic fixtures for M4 tests
system-design.md              # Canonical architecture spec (v3 refactor)
ARCHITECTURE.md               # Request-flow diagrams + failure recovery
scaffold-spec.yaml            # Spec used to publish Confluence + create Jira Stories

Testing

npm test         # vitest run (full suite)
npm run test:watch

Current coverage focuses on auth middleware (src/auth/__tests__/middleware.test.ts). Tool-level test coverage lands in v3 M4 — fixtures already captured in test-fixtures/lever-api/.


Known limitations

  1. perform_as is required on every Lever write — every POST/PUT in Lever v1 requires perform_as=<user-uuid>. v3 multi-tenant resolver (M3b) derives this from the authenticated user's email → Lever user lookup. v1/v2 single-tenant mode uses LEVER_DEFAULT_USER_ID env var.
  2. MCP session state is per-Cloud-Run-container memory — revision swaps drop active sessions; clients reconnect transparently. Acceptable for single-region single-revision deploy. See system-design.md §7 "MCP session state" for context.
  3. No webhook ingestion sink — v3 M6 ships registration tools only (3 tools). Persisting inbound webhook events is a separate future project once a real consumer use case exists.
  4. MCP-Protocol-Version pinned at 2025-06-18 — v3 M1.5 bumps to 2025-11-25 after a compliance audit (RFC 8707 resource parameter, RFC 9207 iss validation, PKCE S256 hard-MUST, Client ID Metadata Documents support).

Contributing

This is the-sid-dani's personal repo. The v3 refactor is tracked at ATF-476. Each milestone has its own Story (ATF-477 through ATF-490). PRs welcome with reference to the relevant Story.

git checkout -b refactor/<feature>
# make changes...
npm run type-check && npm test
git commit -m "feat(...): short description"
# Push, open PR against `main`

License

MIT (see LICENSE if present).


References

推荐服务器

Baidu Map

Baidu Map

百度地图核心API现已全面兼容MCP协议,是国内首家兼容MCP协议的地图服务商。

官方
精选
JavaScript
Playwright MCP Server

Playwright MCP Server

一个模型上下文协议服务器,它使大型语言模型能够通过结构化的可访问性快照与网页进行交互,而无需视觉模型或屏幕截图。

官方
精选
TypeScript
Magic Component Platform (MCP)

Magic Component Platform (MCP)

一个由人工智能驱动的工具,可以从自然语言描述生成现代化的用户界面组件,并与流行的集成开发环境(IDE)集成,从而简化用户界面开发流程。

官方
精选
本地
TypeScript
Audiense Insights MCP Server

Audiense Insights MCP Server

通过模型上下文协议启用与 Audiense Insights 账户的交互,从而促进营销洞察和受众数据的提取和分析,包括人口统计信息、行为和影响者互动。

官方
精选
本地
TypeScript
VeyraX

VeyraX

一个单一的 MCP 工具,连接你所有喜爱的工具:Gmail、日历以及其他 40 多个工具。

官方
精选
本地
graphlit-mcp-server

graphlit-mcp-server

模型上下文协议 (MCP) 服务器实现了 MCP 客户端与 Graphlit 服务之间的集成。 除了网络爬取之外,还可以将任何内容(从 Slack 到 Gmail 再到播客订阅源)导入到 Graphlit 项目中,然后从 MCP 客户端检索相关内容。

官方
精选
TypeScript
Kagi MCP Server

Kagi MCP Server

一个 MCP 服务器,集成了 Kagi 搜索功能和 Claude AI,使 Claude 能够在回答需要最新信息的问题时执行实时网络搜索。

官方
精选
Python
e2b-mcp-server

e2b-mcp-server

使用 MCP 通过 e2b 运行代码。

官方
精选
Neon MCP Server

Neon MCP Server

用于与 Neon 管理 API 和数据库交互的 MCP 服务器

官方
精选
Exa MCP Server

Exa MCP Server

模型上下文协议(MCP)服务器允许像 Claude 这样的 AI 助手使用 Exa AI 搜索 API 进行网络搜索。这种设置允许 AI 模型以安全和受控的方式获取实时的网络信息。

官方
精选