MCP DB Results Anonymizer
Acts as an anonymizing proxy between AI agents and databases, detecting PII and replacing it with realistic fake data so agents never see real data.
README
MCP DB Results Anonymizer
<p align="center"> <a href="README.md"><img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/English-green.svg" /></a> <a href="README.fr.md"><img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/French-blue.svg" /></a> </p>
<p align="center"> <img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/Docker-2CA5E0?style=for-the-badge&logo=docker&logoColor=white" /> <img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/Python-FFD43B?style=for-the-badge&logo=python&logoColor=blue" /> <img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/SQLite-%2307405e.svg?style=for-the-badge&logo=sqlite&logoColor=white" /> </p>
Do AI agents really need access to your real data to help you debug a database or code?
MCP DB Results Anonymizer is a Python MCP Server that acts as an anonymizing proxy between an AI agent (Claude, GPT, etc.) and databases (PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQL Server + MongoDB).
The agent never sees real data or connection credentials.
┌──────────────┐
│ │ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ AI Agent │ │ │ ┌──────────────┐
│ (Claude, │ │ MCP-DB-RESULTS-ANONYMIZER │┌───►│ PostgreSQL │
│ Codex...) │ │ ││ └──────────────┘
│ │ │ 1. Receives the agent's query ││ ┌──────────────┐
│ NEVER sees │ │ 2. Executes the query on the DB │├───►│ MySQL │
│ the real │ │ 3. Detects PII columns (schema+regex) ││ └──────────────┘
│ data │◄──MCP──►│ 4. Pseudonymizes (Faker + seed hash) ││ ┌──────────────┐
│ │ │ 5. Returns faked data │├───►│ SQL Server │
│ NEVER knows │ │ ││ └──────────────┘
│ the │ │ Credentials stored server-side ││ ┌──────────────┐
│ credentials │ │ Consistent mapping in local SQLite │└───►│ MongoDB │
│ │ │ │ └──────────────┘
│ │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────┘
└──────────────┘ │
▼
┌──────────────┐
│ Local SQLite │
│ (hashed │
│ mappings) │
└──────────────┘
Why?
When an AI agent queries a database, the entire result passes through the AI provider's servers - names, emails, phone numbers, addresses, connection credentials.
No existing solution addresses this problem end-to-end via the MCP protocol. Alternatives (mcp-presidio, anonymize.dev) anonymize after the agent has already seen the data. Here, the agent has no direct access to the DB: it must go through the MCP server, which anonymizes before returning the results.
The MCP is the wall (security by design). The project also provides coding-agent hooks (Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor) as an additional safety net - see docs/SECURITY.md.
The flow from the agent's perspective
- The agent sends the SQL query to the MCP proxy
- The proxy executes the query on the real database
- The proxy detects columns containing personal data (PII) - see docs/DETECTION.md
- It replaces real values with pseudonyms
- It returns only the anonymized result to the agent
The agent never sees the real data. Real names, real salaries, etc. never leave the proxy.
Why send results to the agent at all? Because its role is to help analyze and interpret results - spotting duplicates, anomalies, reformulating data. For that, it needs to see the structure and content of the result. Without the data, it could only fix SQL syntax without ever verifying that the result matches what the user is looking for.
The anonymizer is the compromise: the agent receives data that is realistic in structure (correct columns, correct row count, correct types) but fake in content for anything sensitive. This lets it help concretely without exposing personal data.
Designed for / Not designed for
What the MCP IS designed for
| Use case | Why it works |
|---|---|
| Debugging a failing query | The agent fixes your SQL syntax, joins, missing columns - the anonymized result proves the fix works |
| Checking data quality | NULL values, NaN, empty columns, data types, duplicates - these are preserved as-is through anonymization |
| Understanding schema & relationships | describeTable returns real column names, types, and foreign keys |
| Generating test fixtures | generateTestFixtures exports realistic but fully fake data |
| Validating query logic | Row counts, GROUP BY structure, JOIN cardinality - all preserved |
What the MCP is NOT designed for
| Anti-pattern | Why it doesn't work |
|---|---|
| Analyzing data values after anonymization | Names, emails, addresses are replaced with fake equivalents - "Which city do most customers come from?" is unanswerable |
| Statistical analysis on anonymized results | Salaries are perturbed ±15%, dates are shifted - averages, trends, and distributions won't match reality |
| Comparing specific values across queries | Pseudonymization is deterministic within a session, but the values are still fake - don't draw business conclusions from them |
| Auditing real data | By design, the agent never sees real PII - if you need to verify actual values, query the database directly |
In short: the MCP answers "why does this query fail?" and "is the data structure correct?", not "what does the data say?".
Architecture
The MCP server is published on Docker Hub: dnjfr/mcp-db-results-anonymizer.
The interactive installer creates a standalone infrastructure directory that pulls the image from Docker Hub - no local build required.
The MCP server connects to databases via a shared Docker network (mcp-db-results-anonymizer-network). Databases are managed separately - the MCP does not bundle them.
Prerequisites: Docker + Docker Compose.
Installation
git clone https://github.com/dnjfr/mcp-db-results-anonymizer.git
cd mcp-db-results-anonymizer
bash install.sh
The installer creates a directory alongside the project, separate from the source code:
projects/
├── mcp-db-results-anonymizer/ ← source code (this repo)
└── db-results-anonymizer-infra/ ← created by the installer
It guides you step by step:
- Choose the directory name (default:
db-results-anonymizer-infra) - Configure credentials (auto-generation available)
- Start the infrastructure (PostgreSQL + MongoDB + MCP server)
- Choose which demo databases to import
- Connect your coding agent (Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, or Cursor) - MCP registration + security hooks are installed automatically
<details> <summary>Available demo databases</summary>
All demo databases are prefixed with demo_ to avoid conflicts with your own databases.
| # | Database | Content |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | demo_pagila | Video rental - 600 customers, addresses, payments (PostgreSQL) |
| 2 | demo_chinook | Music store - 60 customers, emails, invoices (PostgreSQL) |
| 3 | demo_employees | HR - 300k employees, salaries, dates of birth (PostgreSQL) |
| 4 | demo_adventureworks | E-commerce/HR - 20k people, emails, phones (PostgreSQL) |
| 5 | demo_ecommerce | 10,000 fake customers (MongoDB) |
To uninstall all demos: make uninstall-demos
</details>
<details> <summary>Port conflicts</summary>
The installer exposes default host ports. If you already have services running on these ports, edit docker-compose.yml in the infrastructure directory after installation:
| Service | Default | Change to |
|---|---|---|
| PostgreSQL | 5434:5432 |
5435:5432 (or any free port) |
| MongoDB | 27017:27017 |
27018:27017 |
| MySQL | 3306:3306 |
3307:3306 |
| SQL Server | 1433:1433 |
1434:1433 |
These ports are only used for host access (e.g. connecting with a SQL client). The MCP server connects to databases via the internal Docker network and is not affected by port changes.
</details>
<details> <summary>Connect your own existing databases</summary>
If you already have test databases, they must join the Docker network mcp-db-results-anonymizer-network:
# Your docker-compose.yml
services:
postgres:
image: postgres:16
container_name: mcp_postgres
networks:
- mcp-db-results-anonymizer-network
networks:
mcp-db-results-anonymizer-network:
external: true
Then configure the connection in ~/.mcp-db-results-anonymizer/config.yaml (see docs/CONFIGURATION.md):
databases:
my_database:
type: postgresql
host: mcp_postgres # container name
port: 5432
user: ${POSTGRES_USER}
password: ${POSTGRES_PASSWORD}
database: my_database
</details>
<details> <summary>Difference between global and local</summary>
setup-global |
setup-local |
|
|---|---|---|
| Registration | ~/.claude.json (user scope) |
.mcp.json (project scope) |
| Scope | All projects | This directory only |
</details>
<details> <summary>Supported coding agents</summary>
Because this is a standard MCP server, any MCP-capable agent can connect. The installer's Installation / Agent setup menu (option 1) wires each one up - MCP registration and its security hook, with a global or local scope choice:
| Agent | Endpoint | Config (global / local) | Security hook |
|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Code | /sse |
~/.claude.json / .mcp.json |
PreToolUse in settings.json |
| Codex | /mcp (streamable-http) |
~/.codex/config.toml / .codex/config.toml |
[[hooks.PreToolUse]] in config.toml |
| OpenCode | /sse |
~/.config/opencode/opencode.json / opencode.json |
JS plugin (tool.execute.before) |
| Cursor | /sse |
~/.cursor/mcp.json / .cursor/mcp.json |
preToolUse in hooks.json |
The server exposes /sse and /mcp in parallel, so every agent connects to the same instance. All four share the same blocking rules (scripts/security-hook.sh). See HOOKS.md.
</details>
Usage Example
A user asks their AI agent to fix a query on demo_employees. The query uses the well-known MySQL column names (emp_no, salary, salaries), but this database uses a different PostgreSQL schema (id, amount, salary) - the agent can't guess, it has to look:
I wrote a query on demo_employees but it crashes.
Can you explain why and fix it?
SELECT e.emp_no, e.first_name, e.last_name, s.salary, t.title
FROM employees e
JOIN salaries s ON e.emp_no = s.emp_no
JOIN titles t ON e.emp_no = t.emp_no
WHERE e.hire_date > '1995-01-01'
AND t.to_date = '9999-01-01'
AND s.to_date = '9999-01-01'
ORDER BY s.salary DESC
LIMIT 5;
The agent tries to run it via the MCP. It fails, so it investigates:
I'll check the real schema of demo_employees to identify the errors in your query.
Let me check the schema of the three tables used in your query.
● Called mcp-db-results-anonymizer 3 times
Your query contains 5 errors related to the actual database schema. Here are the details:
┌─────┬───────────────────────────┬──────────────────────────────────┬───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ # │ Error in your query │ Correct value │ Explanation │
├─────┼───────────────────────────┼──────────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 1 │ FROM employees e │ FROM employees.employee e │ The table is employees.employee (schema employees, table employee) │
├─────┼───────────────────────────┼──────────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 2 │ JOIN salaries s │ JOIN employees.salary s │ The table is employees.salary (not salaries) │
├─────┼───────────────────────────┼──────────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 3 │ JOIN titles t │ JOIN employees.title t │ The table is employees.title (not titles) │
├─────┼───────────────────────────┼──────────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 4 │ e.emp_no / s.emp_no / │ e.id / s.employee_id / │ The primary key of employee is id, and the foreign key in salary and title │
│ │ t.emp_no │ t.employee_id │ is employee_id │
├─────┼───────────────────────────┼──────────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 5 │ s.salary │ s.amount │ The salary column is called amount, not salary │
└─────┴───────────────────────────┴──────────────────────────────────┴───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Here is the corrected query:
SELECT e.id, e.first_name, e.last_name, s.amount, t.title
FROM employees.employee e
JOIN employees.salary s ON e.id = s.employee_id
JOIN employees.title t ON e.id = t.employee_id
WHERE e.hire_date > '1995-01-01'
AND t.to_date = '9999-01-01'
AND s.to_date = '9999-01-01'
ORDER BY s.amount DESC
LIMIT 5;
Do you want me to run it to verify it works?
If the user accepts:
● Called mcp-db-results-anonymizer
The query works, here are the 5 results:
┌────────┬────────────┬───────────┬─────────┬──────────────┐
│ id │ first_name │ last_name │ amount │ title │
├────────┼────────────┼───────────┼─────────┼──────────────┤
│ 77152 │ Josette │ Techer │ 147 777 │ Senior Staff │
├────────┼────────────┼───────────┼─────────┼──────────────┤
│ 96407 │ Lorraine │ Vaillant │ 137 374 │ Senior Staff │
├────────┼────────────┼───────────┼─────────┼──────────────┤
│ 458302 │ Camille │ Fontaine │ 143 984 │ Staff │
├────────┼────────────┼───────────┼─────────┼──────────────┤
│ 298341 │ Michelle │ Dupuy │ 137 960 │ Staff │
├────────┼────────────┼───────────┼─────────┼──────────────┤
│ 276755 │ Daniel │ Merle │ 111 490 │ Senior Staff │
└────────┴────────────┴───────────┴─────────┴──────────────┘
Warning: Names and monetary amounts are pseudonymized by the database anonymization proxy.
These are not the actual data-the IDs are reliable, but PII values (such as names and salaries) are
replaced with realistic fake data on every query.
The agent returns the corrected, working query to the user, and it never saw the real PII.
Note: the MCP proxy only intercepts queries that are actually executed. An AI agent that knows the schema can fix a broken query without ever running it, in which case the MCP does not intervene because no data flows through it. This is not a security issue (no data = nothing to protect), but it means the agent won't verify that the result is correct. To have it validate the result, explicitly ask: "run the corrected query to verify".
MCP Tools
| Tool | Description |
|---|---|
listTables |
Lists tables (SQL) or collections (NoSQL) of a database |
describeTable |
Describes the schema + automatically detects PII columns |
querySql |
Executes a SELECT and returns anonymized results |
queryNosql |
Executes an anonymized MongoDB query (find) |
queryNosqlAggregate |
Executes an anonymized MongoDB aggregation pipeline |
generateTestFixtures |
Exports N anonymized rows/documents as JSON or CSV |
Features
- 4 databases supported: PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQL Server, MongoDB (see docs/CONFIGURATION.md)
- 5-layer PII detection: manual classification, column name patterns, value regex, SQL lineage via sqlglot, value scan fallback
- Deterministic pseudonymization: Faker with seed based on
hash(value + session_salt) - Read-only SQL validation: multi-dialect, fail-closed
- Defense in depth: isolated container + hooks + Bearer token + rate limiting
- Lightweight stack: no ML, no Presidio - pattern matching + Faker + sqlglot
Project Structure
mcp-db-results-anonymizer/ ← source code (Docker Hub: dnjfr/mcp-db-results-anonymizer)
├── src/
│ ├── server.py # MCP entry point (FastMCP)
│ ├── config.py # YAML config loader
│ ├── database/ # SQL + MongoDB connectors
│ ├── detection/ # Pattern matching, SQL lineage, value scan
│ ├── anonymizer/ # Faker pseudonymization + numeric perturbation
│ ├── storage/ # Local SQLite (hashed mappings)
│ ├── security/ # SQL validation, Bearer auth, rate limiting
│ └── tools/ # MCP tools (query, metadata, fixtures)
├── scripts/ # Shared security hooks (all agents)
├── infra/ # Templates for the installer
├── docs/ # Detailed documentation
├── install.sh # Interactive installer
├── config.example.yaml # Configuration template
├── Dockerfile # MCP server image
└── Makefile # Docker Hub build/push + MCP registration
Known Limitations
- Person names: if an uncommon first name escapes the value scan, it passes through in plain text
- MongoDB aggregate: computed fields absent from the original schema are not anonymized
- PII in the query:
WHERE email = 'jean@example.com'- the email is transmitted in the query itself - No native TLS: place a reverse proxy in front for HTTPS (see docs/REVERSE_PROXY_HELP.md)
Documentation
| Document | Content |
|---|---|
| docs/CONFIGURATION.md | Operating modes, config.yaml, supported databases, mapping, authentication |
| docs/DETECTION.md | Detected PII types, detection pipeline, manual classification |
| docs/HOOKS.md | Security hooks (Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor), blocked vectors |
| docs/SECURITY.md | Threat model, 30 attack vectors, protections |
| docs/REVERSE_PROXY_HELP.md | nginx + TLS network deployment |
License
Apache License 2.0
推荐服务器
Baidu Map
百度地图核心API现已全面兼容MCP协议,是国内首家兼容MCP协议的地图服务商。
Playwright MCP Server
一个模型上下文协议服务器,它使大型语言模型能够通过结构化的可访问性快照与网页进行交互,而无需视觉模型或屏幕截图。
Magic Component Platform (MCP)
一个由人工智能驱动的工具,可以从自然语言描述生成现代化的用户界面组件,并与流行的集成开发环境(IDE)集成,从而简化用户界面开发流程。
Audiense Insights MCP Server
通过模型上下文协议启用与 Audiense Insights 账户的交互,从而促进营销洞察和受众数据的提取和分析,包括人口统计信息、行为和影响者互动。
VeyraX
一个单一的 MCP 工具,连接你所有喜爱的工具:Gmail、日历以及其他 40 多个工具。
graphlit-mcp-server
模型上下文协议 (MCP) 服务器实现了 MCP 客户端与 Graphlit 服务之间的集成。 除了网络爬取之外,还可以将任何内容(从 Slack 到 Gmail 再到播客订阅源)导入到 Graphlit 项目中,然后从 MCP 客户端检索相关内容。
Kagi MCP Server
一个 MCP 服务器,集成了 Kagi 搜索功能和 Claude AI,使 Claude 能够在回答需要最新信息的问题时执行实时网络搜索。
e2b-mcp-server
使用 MCP 通过 e2b 运行代码。
Neon MCP Server
用于与 Neon 管理 API 和数据库交互的 MCP 服务器
Exa MCP Server
模型上下文协议(MCP)服务器允许像 Claude 这样的 AI 助手使用 Exa AI 搜索 API 进行网络搜索。这种设置允许 AI 模型以安全和受控的方式获取实时的网络信息。