mcp-evidence-ledger

mcp-evidence-ledger

An MCP server providing an append-only, hash-chained evidence ledger for agent actions, where every record is a tamper-evident receipt cryptographically bound to all prior records and persisted as human-readable JSONL local state. It exposes tools to append records, verify chain integrity (pinpointing tampering), query records by actor/action/target/time, and fetch ledger stats—with no update or delete capabilities by design.

Category
访问服务器

README

mcp-evidence-ledger

An MCP server providing an append-only, hash-chained evidence ledger for agent actions. Every record is a tamper-evident receipt cryptographically bound to all prior records, persisted as human-readable local state. Deterministic, no LLM. Agents are non-deterministic; their audit trail should not be.

CI License Python

The idea

When an autonomous agent acts, you need a record of what it did that cannot be quietly altered afterward. This is that record: an append-only ledger where each entry's hash is computed over the previous entry's hash, forming a chain. Altering any past record breaks every hash after it, so tampering is not just discouraged -- it is detectable, and the exact altered record can be named.

It runs as an MCP server, so any agent can call it as a tool. The evidence lands in a plain JSONL file you can open and read: a complete, ordered, cryptographically linked account of every action.

Why it is built this way

Hash-chained, like a mini ledger. record_hash = SHA256(prev_hash + canonical_body). The chain is the integrity guarantee. See ADR 0001.

Append-only, enforced by absence. The server exposes append, read, verify -- and deliberately no update and no delete. History can be written and read, never rewritten. See ADR 0002.

Real, human-readable local state. The ledger is JSONL, one record per line, chosen over a binary store so you can cat your own audit trail. If someone edits the file directly, verify catches it -- which is the point.

Deterministic. No LLM anywhere. Hashing, chaining, and verification are pure functions of the records. Nothing here is probabilistic. An evidence ledger that could be talked out of a finding would not be evidence.

Prove it yourself

Two runnable demos write real ledgers you can inspect:

uv run python specs/demo_basic.py    # record agent actions, verify the chain
uv run python specs/demo_tamper.py   # edit a record in the file, watch verify catch it

demo_tamper.py writes a clean ledger, changes an access level from read to admin directly in the file, and shows the verifier pinpointing the tampered record. Tamper-evidence, demonstrated rather than asserted.

Run as an MCP server

uv sync --extra mcp
EVIDENCE_LEDGER_PATH=./evidence.ledger.jsonl uv run python -m ledger.server

The operator sets the ledger path via EVIDENCE_LEDGER_PATH, not the calling agent -- the agent writes evidence, it does not choose where evidence lands.

MCP tools

Tool What it does
append_record Record an action, receive a tamper-evident receipt hash
verify_ledger Re-walk the chain; prove integrity or pinpoint the first break
get_record Fetch one record by sequence
query_ledger Filter by actor, action, target, or time range
ledger_stats Counts, head hash, and a live integrity check

There is no update tool and no delete tool. That is deliberate.

CLI (for humans)

uv run evidence-ledger --path ./evidence.ledger.jsonl append deploy-agent deploy payments-api --details '{"version":"4.2.0"}'
uv run evidence-ledger --path ./evidence.ledger.jsonl verify
uv run evidence-ledger --path ./evidence.ledger.jsonl stats

What a record contains

The agent supplies the semantics (actor, action, target, details). The ledger owns the integrity fields (seq, timestamp, prev_hash, record_hash) -- an agent cannot forge a hash or a sequence number, because it never computes them.

Optional: a governance lens

The core is generic -- any actor, any action. An optional layer maps actions onto the governance failure taxonomy shared across the portfolio (deployment authorization, change management, data governance, and so on), so an evidence ledger can be read through a governance lens without the core depending on it.

Related work

Repo Relationship
mcp-governance-gateway Enforces governance on the write path; this records tamper-evident proof of what happened
ai-governance-framework The replay imperative this ledger operationalizes

Design decisions

  • 0001 -- Records are hash-chained
  • 0002 -- The ledger is append-only; no update or delete tool exists

License

Apache 2.0

推荐服务器

Baidu Map

Baidu Map

百度地图核心API现已全面兼容MCP协议,是国内首家兼容MCP协议的地图服务商。

官方
精选
JavaScript
Playwright MCP Server

Playwright MCP Server

一个模型上下文协议服务器,它使大型语言模型能够通过结构化的可访问性快照与网页进行交互,而无需视觉模型或屏幕截图。

官方
精选
TypeScript
Magic Component Platform (MCP)

Magic Component Platform (MCP)

一个由人工智能驱动的工具,可以从自然语言描述生成现代化的用户界面组件,并与流行的集成开发环境(IDE)集成,从而简化用户界面开发流程。

官方
精选
本地
TypeScript
Audiense Insights MCP Server

Audiense Insights MCP Server

通过模型上下文协议启用与 Audiense Insights 账户的交互,从而促进营销洞察和受众数据的提取和分析,包括人口统计信息、行为和影响者互动。

官方
精选
本地
TypeScript
VeyraX

VeyraX

一个单一的 MCP 工具,连接你所有喜爱的工具:Gmail、日历以及其他 40 多个工具。

官方
精选
本地
graphlit-mcp-server

graphlit-mcp-server

模型上下文协议 (MCP) 服务器实现了 MCP 客户端与 Graphlit 服务之间的集成。 除了网络爬取之外,还可以将任何内容(从 Slack 到 Gmail 再到播客订阅源)导入到 Graphlit 项目中,然后从 MCP 客户端检索相关内容。

官方
精选
TypeScript
Kagi MCP Server

Kagi MCP Server

一个 MCP 服务器,集成了 Kagi 搜索功能和 Claude AI,使 Claude 能够在回答需要最新信息的问题时执行实时网络搜索。

官方
精选
Python
e2b-mcp-server

e2b-mcp-server

使用 MCP 通过 e2b 运行代码。

官方
精选
Neon MCP Server

Neon MCP Server

用于与 Neon 管理 API 和数据库交互的 MCP 服务器

官方
精选
Exa MCP Server

Exa MCP Server

模型上下文协议(MCP)服务器允许像 Claude 这样的 AI 助手使用 Exa AI 搜索 API 进行网络搜索。这种设置允许 AI 模型以安全和受控的方式获取实时的网络信息。

官方
精选