mcp-incident-copilot

mcp-incident-copilot

MCP server that provides guarded, audited, read-only access to ops tooling (alerts, metrics, logs, deploys, runbooks) and a triage agent that diagnoses incidents end-to-end with CI-verified root cause analysis.

Category
访问服务器

README

mcp-incident-copilot

An MCP server that gives AI agents guarded, audited, read-only access to ops tooling (alerts, metrics, logs, deploys, runbooks), plus a triage agent that diagnoses an injected Kafka-lag incident end to end in 7 tool calls, verified against ground truth in CI, with the full transcript committed.

CI Coverage License Triage

What this solves

  • Agents helping with incidents need access to logs and metrics, and handing them raw credentials is how "AI-assisted ops" fails security review; here every capability is a schema-validated, read-only MCP tool with an audit trail, and the agent has no side door by construction (ADR-001).
  • Post-incident "how did we conclude that" is usually archaeology; here the transcript of every tool call, with the agent's stated reasoning per step, is the committed artifact of the diagnosis.
  • Correlation-based triage is easy to get confidently wrong; this repo's war story is its own agent blaming a deploy 35 minutes late because its inflection detector found where the metric grew fastest instead of where the regime changed, caught by a ground-truth test and fixed with CUSUM.

Why this exists

Two things are true at once: agents are genuinely useful in incident triage (they read faster, correlate wider, and never forget to check deploy markers), and no responsible platform team will hand an agent Grafana admin and kubectl. The resolution is a governed tool surface. This repo builds one over MCP: five read-only tools (list_alerts, list_deploys, query_metric, search_logs, get_runbook), each with a declared schema, argument validation that rejects unknown and missing arguments as typed JSON-RPC errors, result shapes designed for a context window, and an audit trail that becomes part of the incident record.

On top of it runs a triage agent that speaks only MCP, one call at a time. The local planner is a deterministic policy encoding the generic-triage runbook (alerts first, then the timeline of deploys and metric inflections, then mechanism evidence from logs, then the prescribed action); LangGraph over Azure OpenAI is the production planner behind the same interface (ADR-002). Determinism is what buys the strongest claim in the repo: the incident environment is seeded with ground truth (a checkout-consumer deploy at minute 60 introduces a slow deserializer; lag ramps; payment errors follow; pages fire at 74 and 81), and CI fails the build if the agent's diagnosis names the wrong service. The whole loop, transcript, and diagnosis are reproducible from one command.

The incident and the diagnosis

Incident

The recorded triage, step by step (this is the actual committed out/transcript.json rendered):

Transcript

Tech stack

Technology Role in this project Why chosen here
MCP (JSON-RPC 2.0) The only door to the tools Governance is the transport: schemas, typed errors, audit, identical for in-repo and external agents
Python 3.11 asyncio Server, tools, agent loop The loop is IO-shaped tool calls; the whole triage runs in milliseconds locally
NumPy Metric summarization + CUSUM onset detection The inflection detector is the analytical heart, and its failure mode is the war story
Seeded telemetry environment Ground truth The diagnosis is assertable, which is what made the detector bug catchable in CI
LangGraph + Azure OpenAI (prod adapter) Production planner Same next-action interface; swaps in without touching tools, guardrails, or transcript
structlog JSON logs The CLI's summary line is the machine-readable triage record
pytest + pytest-cov Suite 10 tests: protocol guardrails, audit, detector stability across seeds, ground-truth diagnosis; 91 percent measured
GitHub Actions CI Lint, tests, and a triage smoke that asserts the correct root cause on every push

Quickstart

Prerequisites: Python 3.11+, git.

git clone https://github.com/<you>/mcp-incident-copilot.git
cd mcp-incident-copilot
python -m venv .venv && source .venv/bin/activate
pip install -e ".[dev]"

pytest --cov=copilot          # includes the ground-truth diagnosis test

python -m copilot.cli         # run the triage; writes out/transcript.json + out/diagnosis.json
cat out/diagnosis.json

Point any MCP client at McpOpsServer to use the same tools interactively; the server speaks standard initialize / tools/list / tools/call.

The numbers

Metric Value
Tool calls to correct diagnosis 7 (transcript committed)
Onset detection vs injected fault lag onset found at minute 59 (injected 60); error-rate at 60; stable within ±3 across seeds 1, 7, 42, 99 (tested)
Pre-fix detector error blamed a deploy 35 minutes late (notifications@95 vs checkout-consumer@60)
Guardrail tests unknown tool, unknown argument, missing argument: all typed errors; audit trail order asserted
Coverage 91 percent (206 stmts), 10 tests

Architecture decisions

ADR-001: the in-repo agent goes through MCP too; a governance layer with a side door is decoration. ADR-002: the boring choice of a deterministic runbook policy locally with LangGraph/Azure OpenAI as the prod planner, and why that is what makes the diagnosis CI-assertable.

Intentionally out of scope

  • Write actions (restarts, rollbacks, scaling). Read-only is a security posture, not a limitation; a write tool needs approvals and idempotency design of its own. Trigger: a human-in-the-loop approval flow.
  • Live Prometheus/Loki adapters. The tool interfaces are shaped for them (range summaries, capped log results); adapters are mechanical and listed first in future work.
  • LLM-planner demo recordings. A canned LLM transcript would demo nothing verifiable; the deterministic transcript is complete and honest (ADR-002).

Security and compliance

The agent holds no credentials to any underlying system: it can only call declared MCP tools, all read-only. Argument validation rejects anything outside the schema. Every call is audited in order, and the audit is part of the incident artifact. Log results are capped and pre-structured; nothing streams raw production data into a model context unbounded.

Failure modes

Failure Detection Behaviour Recovery
Agent asks for an unknown metric Tool returns the available list instead of an error dead-end Planner can re-select; transcript shows the miss By design
Malformed tool call Typed -32602 with the missing/unknown fields Step fails visibly in the transcript Planner retries with corrected arguments
Flat/noisy metric queried for inflection inflection_significant: false Planner must not build a timeline on it The strength gate exists because of the war story's adjacent failure mode
Two plausible deploys near one onset Correlation window picks the nearest; transcript shows both Ambiguity is visible, not hidden Human reads the transcript; tightening to causal probes is future work
Wrong diagnosis regression CI triage smoke compares against ground truth Build fails The detector fix landed exactly this way

Hardest problem solved

The agent's first full run produced a confident, well-evidenced, wrong answer: it blamed the notifications deploy at minute 95. Ground truth was the checkout-consumer deploy at minute 60. Every step in the transcript looked reasonable; the failure was one number: query_metric reported the lag inflection at minute 92.

The detector computed inflection as the argmax of the smoothed slope. For a metric that goes flat-then-ramp, the slope after onset is roughly constant with noise, so the largest smoothed slope lands anywhere inside the ramp, and this replay put it 32 minutes late, right next to an innocent deploy. The correlation logic then did its job correctly on a wrong input, which is what made the output convincing.

The fix (commit fix(tools): detect metric regime onset with CUSUM, not max slope) reframes the question: not "where does the series move fastest" but "where does the slope regime change". CUSUM over the centered first differences answers that: the cumulative sum falls while the slope is below its mean and rises after, so its extremum is the onset. Measured: lag onset 59, error-rate onset 60, against an injected fault at 60, stable within ±3 minutes across four seeds (tested). A strength score gates flat series as insignificant so the planner cannot build a timeline out of noise. The general lesson: in incident tooling, the analytical primitive underneath the reasoning, not the reasoning itself, is where confident wrongness comes from, and ground-truth tests are how you catch it.

Future work

  • Prometheus and Loki adapters behind the existing tool interfaces.
  • A human-approval write tool (propose_rollback) that files the action for confirmation rather than executing.
  • LangGraph planner wiring as the prod profile with per-step token budgets.
  • Multi-incident environments (concurrent faults) to stress the timeline logic.
  • First metric to watch in adoption: transcript length distribution. Rising call counts per diagnosis means the tool results are not carrying enough signal per call.

License

MIT

推荐服务器

Baidu Map

Baidu Map

百度地图核心API现已全面兼容MCP协议,是国内首家兼容MCP协议的地图服务商。

官方
精选
JavaScript
Playwright MCP Server

Playwright MCP Server

一个模型上下文协议服务器,它使大型语言模型能够通过结构化的可访问性快照与网页进行交互,而无需视觉模型或屏幕截图。

官方
精选
TypeScript
Magic Component Platform (MCP)

Magic Component Platform (MCP)

一个由人工智能驱动的工具,可以从自然语言描述生成现代化的用户界面组件,并与流行的集成开发环境(IDE)集成,从而简化用户界面开发流程。

官方
精选
本地
TypeScript
Audiense Insights MCP Server

Audiense Insights MCP Server

通过模型上下文协议启用与 Audiense Insights 账户的交互,从而促进营销洞察和受众数据的提取和分析,包括人口统计信息、行为和影响者互动。

官方
精选
本地
TypeScript
VeyraX

VeyraX

一个单一的 MCP 工具,连接你所有喜爱的工具:Gmail、日历以及其他 40 多个工具。

官方
精选
本地
graphlit-mcp-server

graphlit-mcp-server

模型上下文协议 (MCP) 服务器实现了 MCP 客户端与 Graphlit 服务之间的集成。 除了网络爬取之外,还可以将任何内容(从 Slack 到 Gmail 再到播客订阅源)导入到 Graphlit 项目中,然后从 MCP 客户端检索相关内容。

官方
精选
TypeScript
Kagi MCP Server

Kagi MCP Server

一个 MCP 服务器,集成了 Kagi 搜索功能和 Claude AI,使 Claude 能够在回答需要最新信息的问题时执行实时网络搜索。

官方
精选
Python
e2b-mcp-server

e2b-mcp-server

使用 MCP 通过 e2b 运行代码。

官方
精选
Neon MCP Server

Neon MCP Server

用于与 Neon 管理 API 和数据库交互的 MCP 服务器

官方
精选
Exa MCP Server

Exa MCP Server

模型上下文协议(MCP)服务器允许像 Claude 这样的 AI 助手使用 Exa AI 搜索 API 进行网络搜索。这种设置允许 AI 模型以安全和受控的方式获取实时的网络信息。

官方
精选