mcp-persistent-context
A lightweight memory layer for MCP servers that persists user context across LLM sessions with minimal token cost, supporting key-value dedup, multi-tenant namespaces, and optional TTL.
README
MCP Persistent Context
A lightweight memory layer for custom MCP servers — persist user context across LLM sessions with minimal token cost.
4 tools. ~600 schema tokens. Key-value dedup. Multi-tenant. Cross-MCP.
Why?
LLMs forget everything between sessions. Every conversation starts from zero.
The official @modelcontextprotocol/server-memory solves this with a knowledge graph (entities, relations, observations). It's powerful — but can be overkill for simple context persistence:
server-memory |
This project | |
|---|---|---|
| Tools | 9 (~1500 schema tokens) | 4 (~600 schema tokens) |
| Read cost | read_graph returns full graph |
Paginated, filtered, compact |
| Multi-tenant | No | Yes (client_id) |
| Cross-MCP | No | Yes (namespace) |
| Dedup | By entity name | By key within (client_id, namespace, category) |
| TTL | No | Optional per-entry expiration |
They are complementary. Use server-memory when you need entity relationships. Use this when you need fast, cheap, structured context for custom MCP projects.
Which version should I use?
Do you have 1 MCP server or multiple?
1 MCP server ──→ Embed (tools_memory.py)
Copy into your project, register tools, done.
2+ MCP servers ─→ Standalone (mcp_memory_server.py)
Run as a separate MCP. Domain servers stay clean.
Context is shared across all MCPs.
| Embedded | Standalone | |
|---|---|---|
| File | tools_memory.py |
mcp_memory_server.py |
| Setup | Import + register in your server | Run as separate process |
| Cross-MCP | No (lives inside one MCP) | Yes (shared by all MCPs) |
| Schema cost | Adds ~600 tokens to your MCP | ~600 tokens in its own MCP |
| Best for | Single MCP projects | Multi-MCP architectures |
Quick Start
Standalone server
pip install "mcp[cli]"
python mcp_memory_server.py --transport streamable-http --port 8770
For Claude Desktop (stdio):
{
"mcpServers": {
"memory": {
"command": "python",
"args": ["path/to/mcp_memory_server.py"],
"env": {
"MEMORY_DIR": "/path/to/memory_data",
"MAX_ENTRIES_PER_CLIENT": "500"
}
}
}
}
Embedded in your MCP server
from mcp.server.fastmcp import FastMCP
from tools_memory import register_memory_tools
from pathlib import Path
from datetime import datetime
mcp = FastMCP("My App")
# Register your domain tools
@mcp.tool()
def do_something(query: str) -> str:
return process(query)
# Register memory tools (4 tools added to your server)
register_memory_tools(
mcp,
memory_dir=Path("./memory_data"),
)
mcp.run()
Tools
save_memory
save_memory(
category="business_context",
type="insight",
content="AS=0 | persona=seniors | monetization=affiliate",
reason="Client business context for SEO strategy.",
client_id="_default",
namespace="general",
ttl_days=0
)
→ "Saved. business_context | insight | 4 entries"
get_memory
get_memory(client_id="acme_corp")
→ Memory 'acme_corp' (4/4):
2026-02-26 INSIGHT | general/business_context | AS=0 | persona=seniors | monetization=affiliate
2026-02-26 DECISION | seo/domain_context | pillar=cloud_computing | approach=editorial_first
2026-02-26 EXCLUSION | seo/domain_context | exclude=serverless | reason=off_topic
2026-02-15 ACTION | general/project_config | stack=React+Node | deploy=Vercel [90d]
delete_memory
delete_memory(content_match="persona", client_id="acme_corp")
→ "Deleted: AS=0 | persona=seniors | monetization=affiliate
3 entries remaining"
memory_status
memory_status(client_id="acme_corp")
→ "'acme_corp': 3 entries | ns: general, seo | cat: business_context, domain_context | 2026-02-15 → 2026-02-26 | 1 with TTL"
Content Format
key=value | key=value | key=value
Why key=value, not JSON?
- 2-3x fewer tokens (
{"key":"value"}= 7 tokens,key=value= 3) - Enables key-based dedup without NLP
- LLMs naturally produce and parse it
- Works across any domain
Key=value is recommended, not enforced. The server warns if no = is
detected, but still saves the entry. Some use cases need free text
(e.g. content="Client confirmed budget by phone"). The dedup engine
simply skips entries without parseable keys.
Examples across domains:
# Marketing / SEO
"AS=0 | persona=seniors | monetization=affiliate+partnerships"
# Healthcare
"allergy=penicillin | blood_type=O+ | primary_care=Dr.Smith"
# Software Engineering
"stack=React+Node | deploy=Vercel | CI=GitHub_Actions"
# Legal
"jurisdiction=FR | entity=SAS | fiscal_year=calendar"
# Education
"level=grade10 | learning_style=visual | weakness=algebra"
Key-Based Dedup
Same (client_id, namespace, category) + overlapping key → merge, don't duplicate:
Existing: "AS=0 | persona=seniors"
Incoming: "AS=12 | site=launched"
Result: "AS=12 | persona=seniors | site=launched"
No parseable keys → append as new entry (no dedup attempted).
Integration Examples
Example 1: Domain MCP delegates memory to standalone server
Your domain MCP does its job. Memory lives elsewhere.
# my_domain_mcp.py — zero memory logic
@mcp.tool()
def analyze_data(query: str) -> str:
results = run_analysis(query)
return json.dumps(results)
Claude's system prompt handles the memory calls:
You have access to two MCP servers: Domain and Memory.
At session start: call get_memory() to load user context.
When the user shares business context, preferences, or decisions:
call save_memory() with key=value content.
Claude sees both MCPs, calls get_memory() at start, calls domain tools
for work, calls save_memory() when the user shares context.
The domain MCP never touches memory.
Example 2: Single MCP with embedded memory
# my_mcp_server.py
from mcp.server.fastmcp import FastMCP
from tools_memory import register_memory_tools
mcp = FastMCP("My App")
@mcp.tool()
def do_something(query: str) -> str:
result = process(query)
# Trigger reminder in response
return f"{result}\n\nMEMORY: save_memory() if user shared context."
register_memory_tools(mcp, memory_dir=Path("./data"))
mcp.run()
Example 3: Multi-tenant with namespace filtering
# User works with client "acme_corp" across multiple domains
# Session 1 (SEO context)
save_memory(client_id="acme_corp", namespace="seo",
category="business_context", type="insight",
content="AS=45 | market=US | vertical=saas",
reason="SEO baseline metrics")
# Session 2 (Ads context) — can read SEO memory too
get_memory(client_id="acme_corp")
# → returns BOTH seo and ads entries
get_memory(client_id="acme_corp", namespace="ads")
# → returns only ads entries
Categories
Recommended (cover most domains):
| Category | What it stores |
|---|---|
business_context |
Company, market, monetization, personas |
project_config |
Stack, architecture, conventions |
user_preference |
Workflow, tone, formatting style |
domain_context |
Domain-specific decisions |
analysis_context |
Recurring findings, baselines |
content_strategy |
Editorial guidelines, content types |
Custom: Use x_ prefix (x_medical_history, x_legal_discovery).
The server warns on unknown categories but does not reject them.
Types
| Type | When to use |
|---|---|
decision |
User chose between options |
exclusion |
User explicitly rejected something |
insight |
Factual context about user/project |
action |
User committed to a plan |
anomaly |
Unexpected finding worth remembering |
TTL (Time-To-Live)
save_memory(..., ttl_days=90) # expires in 90 days
save_memory(..., ttl_days=0) # permanent (default)
- Permanent: Business identity, user preferences, architecture decisions
- 90 days: Campaign context, quarterly goals
- 30 days: Temporary constraints, short-term priorities
Expired entries are pruned automatically on get_memory.
Architecture: 1 Memory MCP, N Domain MCPs
┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐
│ MCP SEO │ │ MCP Ads │ │ MCP Email │
│ 0 memory │ │ 0 memory │ │ 0 memory │
│ tools │ │ tools │ │ tools │
└──────┬──────┘ └──────┬──────┘ └──────┬──────┘
│ │ │
└────────┬────────┴────────┬────────┘
│ │
┌──────┴──────┐ │
│ MCP Memory │◄────────┘
│ 4 tools │
│ shared ctx │
│ ~600 tok │
└─────────────┘
Benefits:
- Schema tokens: ~600 total (not ~600 x N)
- 1
get_memoryat session start (not N) - Context from SEO visible in Ads and vice versa
- Domain MCPs stay focused on their job
Triggering Memory Calls
System prompt instructions alone do NOT reliably trigger LLM memory calls.
Strategy A — Dedicated Memory MCP (recommended for multi-MCP):
Add to system prompt:
At session start: call get_memory() to load user context.
After state-changing tools: if the user shared context, call save_memory().
Strategy B — Embedded in domain MCP (for single-MCP setups):
Inject short reminders in tool responses:
MEMORY: context shared? → save_memory() | correction? → delete_memory()
Keep trigger text under 25 tokens per tool response.
What to persist
| Persist | Don't persist |
|---|---|
| User decisions and preferences | Tool outputs or raw data |
| Business constraints | Intermediate calculations |
| Explicit corrections | Session-specific state |
| What changes future behavior | What can be re-derived |
Server-Side Guards
| Guard | Rule |
|---|---|
| Key dedup | Same (client_id, ns, category) + overlapping key → merge |
| Truncate | content capped at 500 chars |
| Prune | Max entries per client (default: 200, configurable) |
| TTL | Expired entries pruned on read |
| Content warning | Soft warn if no = detected (does not reject) |
| Category warning | Soft warn on non-standard categories (does not reject) |
Configuration
| Variable | Default | Description |
|---|---|---|
MEMORY_DIR |
./memory_data |
Base directory for memory files |
MEMORY_PORT |
8770 |
HTTP port (streamable-http transport) |
MAX_CONTENT_LEN |
500 |
Max characters per content field |
MAX_ENTRIES_PER_CLIENT |
200 |
Max entries per client before pruning oldest |
Storage
{MEMORY_DIR}/{client_id}/memory.json
Each entry:
{
"namespace": "seo",
"category": "business_context",
"type": "insight",
"content": "AS=0 | persona=seniors | monetization=affiliate",
"reason": "Client business profile.",
"date": "2026-02-26T14:30:00",
"ttl_days": 90
}
Implementation Checklist
- [ ] 4 tools:
save_memory,get_memory,delete_memory,memory_status - [ ]
contentformat:key=value | key=value(soft warn if no=) - [ ] Key-based dedup on
(client_id, namespace, category) - [ ]
contenttruncated atMAX_CONTENT_LEN(default 500) - [ ] Max
MAX_ENTRIES_PER_CLIENTentries (default 200) - [ ] TTL pruning on
get_memory - [ ]
client_iddefaults to_default - [ ]
namespacedefaults togeneral - [ ] Categories: recommended set + custom
x_prefix (warn, don't reject) - [ ]
typeenum: decision, exclusion, insight, action, anomaly
License
MIT
推荐服务器
Baidu Map
百度地图核心API现已全面兼容MCP协议,是国内首家兼容MCP协议的地图服务商。
Playwright MCP Server
一个模型上下文协议服务器,它使大型语言模型能够通过结构化的可访问性快照与网页进行交互,而无需视觉模型或屏幕截图。
Magic Component Platform (MCP)
一个由人工智能驱动的工具,可以从自然语言描述生成现代化的用户界面组件,并与流行的集成开发环境(IDE)集成,从而简化用户界面开发流程。
Audiense Insights MCP Server
通过模型上下文协议启用与 Audiense Insights 账户的交互,从而促进营销洞察和受众数据的提取和分析,包括人口统计信息、行为和影响者互动。
VeyraX
一个单一的 MCP 工具,连接你所有喜爱的工具:Gmail、日历以及其他 40 多个工具。
graphlit-mcp-server
模型上下文协议 (MCP) 服务器实现了 MCP 客户端与 Graphlit 服务之间的集成。 除了网络爬取之外,还可以将任何内容(从 Slack 到 Gmail 再到播客订阅源)导入到 Graphlit 项目中,然后从 MCP 客户端检索相关内容。
Kagi MCP Server
一个 MCP 服务器,集成了 Kagi 搜索功能和 Claude AI,使 Claude 能够在回答需要最新信息的问题时执行实时网络搜索。
e2b-mcp-server
使用 MCP 通过 e2b 运行代码。
Neon MCP Server
用于与 Neon 管理 API 和数据库交互的 MCP 服务器
Exa MCP Server
模型上下文协议(MCP)服务器允许像 Claude 这样的 AI 助手使用 Exa AI 搜索 API 进行网络搜索。这种设置允许 AI 模型以安全和受控的方式获取实时的网络信息。