MCP Trust Gateway
Enables trust, reputation, and economic accountability for MCP by proxying between clients and servers, enriching every tool invocation with trust evaluation, KYA tiers, spending limits, and delegation chains.
README
MCP Trust Gateway
Trust, reputation, and economic accountability for MCP — the missing layer above OAuth.
MCP's OAuth 2.1 foundation answers who is this agent? This gateway answers the harder question: authenticated, but trustworthy? It sits between MCP clients and upstream MCP servers as a protocol-transparent proxy, enriching every tool invocation with trust evaluation powered by A2A Settlement Exchange reputation, KYA tiers, spending limits, and delegation chains.
MCP Client Upstream MCP Servers
(Claude, Cursor, agents) (any MCP server)
│ ▲
│ MCP Streamable HTTP │
│ + OAuth 2.1 / PKCE │
▼ │
┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ MCP Trust Gateway │
│ │
│ ┌─────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────────────┐ │
│ │ OAuth 2.1 │ │ Trust │ │ Pre-Auth Tool │ │
│ │ + Settlement│ │ Evaluator │ │ Discovery │ │
│ │ Claims │ │ (KYA + EMA) │ │ (/.well-known/ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │ mcp-tools) │ │
│ └──────┬──────┘ └──────┬───────┘ └──────────────────────┘ │
│ │ │ │
│ ┌──────┴──────┐ ┌──────┴───────┐ │
│ │ RFC 8693 │ │ Scope-to-KYA │ │
│ │ Token │ │ Tier Mapper │ │
│ │ Exchange │ │ │ │
│ │ + Trust │ │ │ │
│ │ Decay │ │ │ │
│ └─────────────┘ └──────────────┘ │
└───────────────────────────┬───────────────────────────────────┘
│ queries
▼
┌───────────────────────┐
│ A2A Settlement │
│ Exchange │
│ (reputation, KYA, │
│ agent directory) │
└───────────────────────┘
The Gap
MCP has made real progress on authentication. OAuth 2.1 with PKCE, Streamable HTTP transport, the MCP Connector in Claude's API, and enterprise IdP integrations from Auth0 and AWS. The identity problem is largely solved.
But four gaps remain — and they all sit above authentication:
| MCP Challenge | Root Problem | What This Gateway Provides |
|---|---|---|
| Scope standardization | read:files means whatever each server decides |
Trust-tier-mapped scopes: KYA levels give scopes meaning beyond arbitrary strings |
| 3rd-party agents blocked by redirects | Autonomous agents can't do browser-based OAuth redirects | Authorization intermediary: the gateway handles OAuth on behalf of agents using the Economic Air Gap pattern |
| Tool discovery gated behind auth | Agents must authenticate before knowing what tools exist | Pre-auth discovery endpoint (/.well-known/mcp-tools) backed by the exchange's agent directory and Agent Cards |
| Multi-hop token exchange | RFC 8693 doesn't address trust decay across delegation hops | Trust-decaying token exchange: EMA reputation scoring layered on top of RFC 8693, with delegation chains that narrow authority per hop |
The common thread: authentication is necessary but not sufficient for autonomous agents. OAuth says "this token is valid." The trust gateway adds "and here's how much you should trust the agent presenting it."
How It Works
1. Trust-Enriched OAuth
The gateway implements MCP's OAuth 2.1 flow (Authorization Code + PKCE) but enriches issued tokens with settlement claims:
{
"sub": "agent:analytics-bot-7f3a",
"scope": "settlement:transact mcp:tool:invoke",
"https://a2a-settlement.org/claims": {
"agent_id": "analytics-bot-7f3a",
"org_id": "org-acme-corp",
"kya_level": 1,
"reputation": 0.87,
"spending_limits": { "per_transaction": 500, "per_day": 5000 },
"counterparty_policy": { "require_min_reputation": 0.7 },
"delegation": {
"chain": [{ "principal": "user:julie@acme.com", "delegated_at": "2026-03-01T09:00:00Z" }],
"transferable": false
}
}
}
The token carries identity (OAuth) and trustworthiness (settlement claims) in a single artifact.
2. Pre-Auth Tool Discovery
Agents can discover available tools and their trust requirements before authenticating:
GET /.well-known/mcp-tools
{
"tools": [
{
"name": "query_database",
"description": "Run read-only SQL queries",
"required_kya_level": 0,
"required_reputation": 0.0,
"required_scope": "mcp:read"
},
{
"name": "execute_trade",
"description": "Submit a trade order",
"required_kya_level": 2,
"required_reputation": 0.8,
"required_scope": "mcp:tool:financial"
}
]
}
Clients evaluate what permissions they need before initiating OAuth. No more blind authorization prompts.
3. Trust Evaluation on Every Call
On every proxied tools/call, the gateway evaluates:
- KYA tier >= tool's required tier (identity verification depth)
- EMA reputation >= tool's minimum threshold (track record)
- Spending limits not exceeded (economic guardrails)
- Counterparty policy allows the upstream server (organizational constraints)
- Delegation chain is intact and transferable flag permits the hop
If trust is insufficient, the gateway returns a structured denial with an upgrade path:
{
"error": "trust_insufficient",
"required_kya_level": 2,
"current_kya_level": 1,
"upgrade_url": "https://exchange.example.com/kya/upgrade",
"message": "This tool requires AUDITABLE identity verification. Current level: ORGANIZATIONAL."
}
4. Trust-Decaying Token Exchange
For multi-hop scenarios (agent A delegates to agent B which calls tool C), the gateway implements RFC 8693 token exchange extended with trust decay:
Agent A (reputation: 0.92)
│
│ RFC 8693 token exchange
│ trust_score = 0.92 × 0.85 decay = 0.782
▼
Agent B (delegated token, effective trust: 0.782)
│
│ second hop
│ trust_score = 0.782 × 0.85 decay = 0.665
▼
Tool C (requires min reputation: 0.6) ✓ allowed
Each hop in the delegation chain reduces effective trust via EMA-weighted decay. Scopes narrow (never widen). Spending limits reduce proportionally. The result: "yes this token is valid, but the further it travels from the original principal, the less authority it carries."
5. Scope-to-Trust-Tier Mapping
Instead of arbitrary server-defined scope strings, the gateway maps MCP tool categories to trust tiers:
| MCP Scope | KYA Level Required | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
mcp:read |
SANDBOX (0) | Read-only access, any agent |
mcp:tool:invoke |
SANDBOX (0) | Basic tool invocation |
mcp:tool:write |
ORGANIZATIONAL (1) | Tools that mutate state |
mcp:tool:financial |
AUDITABLE (2) | Tools with economic impact |
mcp:delegate |
AUDITABLE (2) | Sub-delegation of authority |
This gives scopes meaning grounded in verified identity, not server whim.
Install
pip install -e .
Or from git:
pip install git+https://github.com/a2a-settlement/mcp-trust-gateway.git
Quick Start
1. Start the Gateway
export A2A_EXCHANGE_URL=http://localhost:3000
export MCP_TRUST_GATEWAY_PORT=3100
python -m mcp_trust_gateway
The gateway starts on port 3100, proxying to upstream MCP servers registered in the exchange's agent directory.
2. Connect Claude Desktop
Add to claude_desktop_config.json:
{
"mcpServers": {
"trust-gateway": {
"url": "http://localhost:3100/mcp",
"authorization": {
"type": "oauth2",
"authorization_url": "http://localhost:3100/oauth/authorize",
"token_url": "http://localhost:3100/oauth/token"
}
}
}
}
3. Connect Cursor
Add to .cursor/mcp.json:
{
"mcpServers": {
"trust-gateway": {
"url": "http://localhost:3100/mcp",
"env": {
"A2A_EXCHANGE_URL": "http://localhost:3000"
}
}
}
}
Configuration
| Variable | Default | Description |
|---|---|---|
A2A_EXCHANGE_URL |
http://localhost:3000 |
A2A Settlement Exchange URL |
MCP_TRUST_GATEWAY_PORT |
3100 |
Gateway listen port |
MCP_TRUST_DECAY_FACTOR |
0.85 |
Trust decay per delegation hop |
MCP_TRUST_MIN_REPUTATION |
0.0 |
Global minimum reputation floor |
MCP_TRUST_DEFAULT_KYA |
0 |
Default KYA level for unverified agents |
OAUTH_ISSUER |
(required) | OAuth token issuer URL |
OAUTH_SIGNING_KEY |
(required) | Key for signing issued tokens |
Project Structure
mcp-trust-gateway/
SPEC.md # RFC-style trust layer specification
README.md
pyproject.toml
src/mcp_trust_gateway/
__init__.py
__main__.py # Entry point
config.py # Environment configuration
server.py # MCP server (client-facing)
proxy.py # MCP client (upstream-facing proxy)
oauth/
provider.py # OAuth 2.1 + PKCE authorization endpoint
token_exchange.py # RFC 8693 with trust decay
metadata.py # RFC 8414 / RFC 9728 metadata
trust/
evaluator.py # Trust evaluation engine
scope_mapper.py # MCP scope <-> SettlementScope <-> KYA tier
trust_decay.py # EMA-weighted trust decay for delegation
discovery/
well_known.py # /.well-known/mcp-tools endpoint
registry.py # Exchange directory -> tool manifest bridge
tests/
examples/
Design Principles
Protocol-transparent proxy. The gateway does not define its own MCP tools. It proxies upstream MCP servers and adds trust evaluation as middleware. Any existing MCP server works without modification.
Reuse, don't rebuild. OAuth token validation, scope checking, claims parsing, spending limits, and delegation chains come from a2a-settlement-auth. Reputation and KYA queries come from the a2a-settlement SDK. The gateway is the glue.
Spec-first. The SPEC.md is the primary deliverable — it's what gets proposed back to the MCP ecosystem as the missing trust layer. The code is the reference implementation.
Additive, not competitive. This builds on MCP's OAuth 2.1 foundation. It does not replace it, fork it, or compete with it. It answers the question OAuth was never designed to answer: should you trust this agent?
Related Projects
| Project | Description |
|---|---|
| a2a-settlement | Core settlement exchange + SDK (reputation, KYA, escrow) |
| a2a-settlement-auth | OAuth settlement scopes, claims, spending limits, delegation chains |
| a2a-settlement-mcp | MCP server exposing settlement operations as tools |
| a2a-settlement-mediator | AI-powered dispute resolution |
| a2a-settlement-dashboard | Human oversight dashboard |
| settlebridge-ai | SettleBridge Gateway — trust/policy enforcement for settlement requests |
| otel-agent-provenance | OpenTelemetry provenance conventions |
| a2a-federation-rfc | Federation protocol — trust discount across exchanges |
| langgraph-a2a-settlement | LangGraph integration |
| crewai-a2a-settlement | CrewAI integration |
| litellm-a2a-settlement | LiteLLM integration |
| adk-a2a-settlement | Google ADK integration |
This gateway vs a2a-settlement-mcp: The MCP server exposes settlement operations as tools (create escrow, check balance, etc.). This gateway evaluates trust on MCP tool invocations. They are complementary — you might use the MCP server behind this gateway, or use the gateway to protect any other MCP server.
Contributing
See CONTRIBUTING.md. The most impactful contributions right now are to the SPEC.md — helping formalize the trust layer so it can be proposed upstream to the MCP ecosystem.
License
MIT. See LICENSE.
推荐服务器
Baidu Map
百度地图核心API现已全面兼容MCP协议,是国内首家兼容MCP协议的地图服务商。
Playwright MCP Server
一个模型上下文协议服务器,它使大型语言模型能够通过结构化的可访问性快照与网页进行交互,而无需视觉模型或屏幕截图。
Magic Component Platform (MCP)
一个由人工智能驱动的工具,可以从自然语言描述生成现代化的用户界面组件,并与流行的集成开发环境(IDE)集成,从而简化用户界面开发流程。
Audiense Insights MCP Server
通过模型上下文协议启用与 Audiense Insights 账户的交互,从而促进营销洞察和受众数据的提取和分析,包括人口统计信息、行为和影响者互动。
VeyraX
一个单一的 MCP 工具,连接你所有喜爱的工具:Gmail、日历以及其他 40 多个工具。
graphlit-mcp-server
模型上下文协议 (MCP) 服务器实现了 MCP 客户端与 Graphlit 服务之间的集成。 除了网络爬取之外,还可以将任何内容(从 Slack 到 Gmail 再到播客订阅源)导入到 Graphlit 项目中,然后从 MCP 客户端检索相关内容。
Kagi MCP Server
一个 MCP 服务器,集成了 Kagi 搜索功能和 Claude AI,使 Claude 能够在回答需要最新信息的问题时执行实时网络搜索。
e2b-mcp-server
使用 MCP 通过 e2b 运行代码。
Neon MCP Server
用于与 Neon 管理 API 和数据库交互的 MCP 服务器
Exa MCP Server
模型上下文协议(MCP)服务器允许像 Claude 这样的 AI 助手使用 Exa AI 搜索 API 进行网络搜索。这种设置允许 AI 模型以安全和受控的方式获取实时的网络信息。