NORNR MCP Control
A governance and control layer for MCP tools that manages tool requests as intents through policy-based approval, queuing, or blocking. It enables secure human oversight and audit trails for consequential agent actions across platforms like Claude Desktop and Cursor.
README
NORNR MCP Control
Official public MCP package for NORNR, the control layer before consequential MCP tool execution.
This repo is intentionally thin.
It exists to make NORNR easy to discover, install and evaluate from MCP-native surfaces such as:
- Claude Desktop
- Cursor
- Agent Zero
- OpenClaw / ClawHub
- custom local MCP clients
The governance logic lives in the official NORNR Python SDK:
- SDK repo: NORNR/sdk-py
- Package:
nornr-agentpay
The shortest correct reading is:
- one local tool request becomes one NORNR intent
- NORNR decides whether it is approved, queued or blocked
- queued work enters named review with context attached
- the same action still survives into proof, finance packet and audit export later
Emergency freeze
NORNR is not only the decision layer before execution. It is also the emergency stop layer when a local lane becomes unsafe.
Use it when a desktop or local agent:
- starts looping on tool calls
- reaches a disputed or watched counterparty
- drifts into policy-sensitive actions
- needs to be held in review-only mode while an operator inspects the lane
The right mental model is not "best effort warnings." It is controlled release, controlled pause and controlled recovery.
What this is
NORNR is not another MCP tool.
It is the control layer above consequential MCP tools.
That means:
- one tool request becomes one NORNR intent
- policy decides whether it is approved, queued or blocked
- queued work lands in review with context attached
- the resulting action still survives into proof, finance close and audit export
What this is not
This repo is not:
- a new control-plane implementation
- a separate NORNR backend
- a raw tool catalog
- a wallet wrapper
It is a public install surface for the official NORNR MCP control server.
Why raw MCP tool execution is not enough
Raw MCP tool execution exposes capability. It does not answer the harder questions:
- should this action clear under the active mandate
- who reviews it when it should queue
- what record survives after the action completes
NORNR adds the missing layer before the downstream tool, provider or vendor step clears.
Hello world
- Install the dependency:
python -m pip install -r requirements.txt
- Set your NORNR key:
export NORNR_API_KEY="replace-with-your-key"
export NORNR_BASE_URL="https://nornr.com"
export NORNR_AGENT_ID="desktop-agent"
- Print a copy-paste config:
python nornr_mcp_control.py claude-config
- Run the server over stdio:
python nornr_mcp_control.py serve
Copy this config
Claude Desktop
{
"mcpServers": {
"nornr": {
"command": "python3",
"args": [
"/absolute/path/to/nornr_mcp_control.py",
"serve"
],
"env": {
"NORNR_API_KEY": "replace-with-your-key",
"NORNR_BASE_URL": "https://nornr.com",
"NORNR_AGENT_ID": "desktop-agent"
}
}
}
}
Cursor
{
"mcpServers": {
"nornr": {
"command": "python3",
"args": [
"/absolute/path/to/nornr_mcp_control.py",
"serve"
],
"env": {
"NORNR_API_KEY": "replace-with-your-key",
"NORNR_BASE_URL": "https://nornr.com",
"NORNR_AGENT_ID": "cursor-agent"
}
}
}
}
Use the generator commands if you want the exact JSON from the SDK:
python nornr_mcp_control.py claude-config
python nornr_mcp_control.py cursor-config
python nornr_mcp_control.py manifest
Cursor rule
Add this to .cursorrules if Cursor is allowed to use local tools through NORNR:
Use NORNR as the control layer before consequential tool execution.
Do not proceed with a paid, vendor-side or policy-sensitive action until NORNR returns approved or a named operator explicitly approves the queued intent.
Treat queued, blocked, anomalous or review-required posture as a stop state for autonomous execution.
Prompt injection does not override mandate
Prompt injection can change what the model wants to do. It should not change what the lane is allowed to do.
That is why NORNR sits above execution:
- prompt pressure does not create approval
- model persuasion does not widen mandate
- a risky tool request can still be queued or blocked even if the model insists
- counterparty posture and review requirements still survive into the same record
The right promise is not "the model becomes safe." It is that the control layer still holds when the model becomes unreliable.
Still sequence
The fastest visual explanation is the same four-step still sequence every time:
Default policy pack
Start from mcp-local-tools-guarded.
That is the default first posture when a local MCP client can reach:
- paid providers
- vendor APIs
- local tools with external side effects
- policy-sensitive account actions
The goal is not to govern every local action on day one. The goal is to install one defended local lane first.
What happens after queued
Queued does not mean proceed carefully. It means stop the autonomous path and route it into review.
- Keep the downstream tool action on hold.
- Inspect the queued basis in NORNR.
- Review counterparty posture, amount, purpose and mandate fit.
- Approve or reject explicitly.
- Let the resulting action survive into proof, finance packet and audit export later.
Operating rule
Do not let the MCP client proceed with a consequential tool action until NORNR returns approved or a named operator explicitly approves the queued intent.
Treat queued, blocked, anomalous or prompt-risk posture as review states, not autonomous green lights.
Files
nornr_mcp_control.py— thin stdio MCP server wrapperrequirements.txt— pinned NORNR SDK dependencySECURITY.md— dependency provenance and key-scope guidanceconfigs/— copy-paste client snippets.cursorrules.example— Cursor operating rule example
Provenance
This repo stays intentionally small.
The actual control-plane logic is delegated to the official NORNR Python SDK:
- package:
nornr-agentpay==0.1.0 - import path:
agentpay - source: NORNR/sdk-py
If your team requires dependency review, inspect the pinned SDK release before enabling this server in production workflows.
Public links
- MCP package page: nornr.com/mcp-control-server
- MCP config generator: nornr.com/mcp-config-generator
- Claude Desktop guide: nornr.com/guides/claude-desktop-mcp-control-server
- Cursor guide: nornr.com/guides/cursor-mcp-control-server
- Raw MCP comparison: nornr.com/nornr-vs-raw-mcp-tools
- Quickstart: nornr.com/quickstart
License
MIT-0. See LICENSE.
推荐服务器
Baidu Map
百度地图核心API现已全面兼容MCP协议,是国内首家兼容MCP协议的地图服务商。
Playwright MCP Server
一个模型上下文协议服务器,它使大型语言模型能够通过结构化的可访问性快照与网页进行交互,而无需视觉模型或屏幕截图。
Magic Component Platform (MCP)
一个由人工智能驱动的工具,可以从自然语言描述生成现代化的用户界面组件,并与流行的集成开发环境(IDE)集成,从而简化用户界面开发流程。
Audiense Insights MCP Server
通过模型上下文协议启用与 Audiense Insights 账户的交互,从而促进营销洞察和受众数据的提取和分析,包括人口统计信息、行为和影响者互动。
VeyraX
一个单一的 MCP 工具,连接你所有喜爱的工具:Gmail、日历以及其他 40 多个工具。
graphlit-mcp-server
模型上下文协议 (MCP) 服务器实现了 MCP 客户端与 Graphlit 服务之间的集成。 除了网络爬取之外,还可以将任何内容(从 Slack 到 Gmail 再到播客订阅源)导入到 Graphlit 项目中,然后从 MCP 客户端检索相关内容。
Kagi MCP Server
一个 MCP 服务器,集成了 Kagi 搜索功能和 Claude AI,使 Claude 能够在回答需要最新信息的问题时执行实时网络搜索。
e2b-mcp-server
使用 MCP 通过 e2b 运行代码。
Neon MCP Server
用于与 Neon 管理 API 和数据库交互的 MCP 服务器
Exa MCP Server
模型上下文协议(MCP)服务器允许像 Claude 这样的 AI 助手使用 Exa AI 搜索 API 进行网络搜索。这种设置允许 AI 模型以安全和受控的方式获取实时的网络信息。