openclaw-health-mcp

openclaw-health-mcp

MCP server for AI agent deployment health — gateway status, CPU/memory/swap, recent errors from journalctl/dmesg, skill registry integrity, upgrade outcomes, cron + disk usage. Each component gets HEALTHY/DEGRADED/CRITICAL classification with overall rollup.

Category
访问服务器

README

openclaw-health-mcp

<!-- mcp-name: io.github.temurkhan13/openclaw-health-mcp -->

MCP server for AI agent deployment health — gateway status, CPU/RAM/swap, recent errors from journalctl/dmesg, skill-registry integrity, upgrade outcomes, cron + disk usage in a single tool call. Each component gets a HEALTHY/DEGRADED/CRITICAL classification, with overall rollup + ranked critical findings. Linux-proc backend works on any Linux/macOS/Windows host; OpenClaw operators get native ~/.openclaw/ parsing as a built-in reference implementation. Keywords: AI agent health, production AI monitoring, deployment readiness, MCP infrastructure observability.

Status: v1.0.3 Tests: 74 passing License: MIT MCP PyPI


What it does

Anyone running production AI agents needs a single tool that answers "is this deployment healthy right now?" without SSH'ing in to run six separate commands. The HN front-page thread Ask HN: How are you monitoring AI agents in production? (March 2026) made the gap explicit — the most-upvoted comments described:

  • "observability and governance cannot live inside the agent framework. They have to live in an independent execution layer" — the framework-level monitoring leaks audit trail when teams use multiple frameworks
  • "agent makes 10,000 correct $0.02 decisions that collectively don't make sense" — per-call rate limits miss systemic patterns
  • The gap that "actually hurts during post-mortems" — knowing whether a model drifted, context window failed, or tool misbehaved

Existing options (LangSmith, Langfuse, AgentShield, OTEL/LGTM) sit at the framework or proxy layer. openclaw-health-mcp sits one level closer to the agent runtime — read-only, local, MCP-native — surfacing infrastructure-layer health (gateway, CPU/RAM, recent errors, skill-registry, upgrade outcome, cron, disk) to the same Claude conversation that's running the agent. Works on any Linux/macOS/Windows host out of the box via the linux-proc backend; OpenClaw operators get an additional native backend that parses ~/.openclaw/ paths.

> claude: is my OpenClaw deployment healthy?
[MCP tool: health_overview]
overall_health: critical
component_summary:
  gateway: degraded         (bound to 0.0.0.0, 1 crash in 24h)
  resources: degraded       (memory at 78%, swap at 12%)
  skill_registry: critical  (skill 'clawhub-trending-bot-v2' flagged suspicious)
  upgrade: degraded         (last upgrade rolled back)
  cron: degraded            (1 overdue job)
  disk: degraded            (root at 82%, log dir +187 MB/24h)

critical_findings:
  [CRITICAL] Skill 'clawhub-trending-bot-v2' flagged — possible exfiltration. Disable.
  [DEGRADED] Last upgrade 2026.4.23→2026.4.26 rolled back: websocket_stalls, cpu_spike.
  [DEGRADED] Root disk at 82% — set up log rotation before reaching 95%.
  [DEGRADED] 1 cron job(s) overdue. Install silentwatch-mcp for silent-failure detection.

Why openclaw-health-mcp

Three things that existing tools (Datadog, Prometheus, raw top/free/df) don't do for OpenClaw specifically:

  1. OpenClaw-aware probes. Detects 0.0.0.0-binding (the default-publicly-exposed misconfig per the 135k exposed-instances stat), parses ClawHub skill-registry diffs, recognizes named upgrade-regression patterns (websocket_stalls, cpu_spike post-2026.4.26), distinguishes intentional restarts from crashes.
  2. MCP-native, no integration layer. Claude Desktop, Cline, Continue, OpenClaw agents — any MCP-aware client queries directly. No Grafana plugin, no API wrapper, no JSON to parse manually.
  3. Composable with the rest of the production-AI MCP stack. Pairs with silentwatch-mcp (cron silent-failure detection — cron_health here is intentionally basic and defers to silentwatch when present). Skill-registry vetting in this server is light heuristics; deep static analysis goes in openclaw-skill-vetter-mcp (planned).

Built for the SMB self-hoster running OpenClaw on a $40 VPS where Datadog is overkill — but the OpenClaw-specific patterns are valuable on enterprise infra too.


Tool surface

The server registers these MCP tools (full spec in SPEC.md):

Tool Returns
health_overview Full snapshot — every component + overall HealthLevel + ranked critical findings
gateway_status Gateway alive/dead, uptime, restarts, crashes, bind address
cpu_memory_health CPU/memory/swap snapshot + 24h OOM count + load averages
recent_errors(window_hours, min_severity) Recent error/warning entries, filterable by lookback + severity
skill_registry_check Skill counts, recent additions/modifications, light heuristic flags
last_upgrade_status From-version, to-version, outcome, regression markers, available upgrade
cron_health Basic cron summary (defers to silentwatch-mcp when richer detection wanted)
disk_usage Root disk + log directory size + 24h growth + largest log files

Resources:

  • health://overview — full snapshot (same as health_overview tool)
  • health://gateway — gateway-only
  • health://resources — CPU/memory-only

Prompts:

  • diagnose-degraded-health — diagnostic walk-through, ranked corrective actions
  • summarize-health-trend — daily operational digest

Quickstart

Install

pip install openclaw-health-mcp

Configure for Claude Desktop

Add to ~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json (macOS) or %APPDATA%\Claude\claude_desktop_config.json (Windows):

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "openclaw-health": {
      "command": "python",
      "args": ["-m", "openclaw_health_mcp"],
      "env": {
        "OPENCLAW_HEALTH_BACKEND": "mock"
      }
    }
  }
}

Restart Claude Desktop. Test:

Show me a full health snapshot of my OpenClaw deployment.

The mock backend returns deliberately mixed data (gateway DEGRADED, skill registry CRITICAL, etc.) so the response demonstrates the full schema.

Backends

Backend Status Description
mock ✅ v1.0 Sample data for protocol-wiring verification (default)
linux-proc ✅ v1.0 psutil-based system metrics (CPU/memory/swap/load/disk) cross-platform; Linux-specific OOM-event detection via journalctl/dmesg; recent-error log parsing via journalctl. Returns UNKNOWN for OpenClaw-specific components (gateway, skill_registry, upgrade, cron) — those need the openclaw backend
openclaw ⏳ v1.1 Parses OpenClaw config + log directory + ClawHub manifest + upgrade journal

Select via OPENCLAW_HEALTH_BACKEND env var. Multi-backend support (federating linux-proc system metrics + openclaw application-specific) is planned for v1.2.


Roadmap

Version Scope Status
v0.1 Protocol wiring, mock backend, 8 tools / 3 resources / 2 prompts, 40 tests
v1.0 linux-proc backend (psutil + journalctl/dmesg OOM detection + log parsing); GitHub Actions CI matrix; PyPI Trusted Publishing; MCP Registry submission; 59 tests
v1.1 openclaw backend — parses OpenClaw config, log dir, ClawHub manifest, upgrade journal
v1.2 Backend federation (linux-proc + openclaw); expanded log sources
v1.x cowork backend, custom backend SDK, webhook emitter for alerts

Need this adapted to your stack?

openclaw-health-mcp ships with a mock backend at v0.1 (Linux + OpenClaw backends in v0.2). If your AI agent runtime is different — Claude Code, Cowork, custom Python services, agent harnesses on AWS / GCP — and you want the same single-pane health visibility for it, that's a Custom MCP Build engagement.

Tier Scope Investment Timeline
Simple Single backend adapter for an existing runtime with documented logging/metrics $8,000–$10,000 1–2 weeks
Standard Custom backend + custom severity rules + integration with your existing alerting $15,000–$20,000 2–4 weeks
Complex Multi-backend federation + RBAC + audit-log integration + on-call workflow $25,000–$35,000 4–8 weeks

To engage:

  1. Email temur@pixelette.tech with subject Custom MCP Build inquiry
  2. Include: a 1-paragraph description of your stack + which tier you're considering
  3. Reply within 2 business days with a 30-min discovery call slot

This server is part of a production-AI infrastructure MCP suite — companion to silentwatch-mcp (cron silent-failure detection) and the upcoming AI Production Discipline Framework Notion template (the methodology these tools operationalize).


Production AI audits

If you're running production AI and want an outside practitioner to score readiness, find the failure patterns already present, and write the corrective-action plan — that's what this MCP is built into supporting:

Tier Scope Investment Timeline
Audit Lite One system, top-5 findings, written report $1,500 1 week
Audit Standard Full audit, all 14 patterns, 5 Cs findings, 90-day follow-up $3,000 2–3 weeks
Audit + Workshop Standard audit + 2-day team workshop + first monthly audit included $7,500 3–4 weeks

Same email channel: temur@pixelette.tech with subject AI audit inquiry.


Contributing

PRs welcome. Backends are intentionally pluggable — see src/openclaw_health_mcp/backends/ for the contract.

To add a new backend:

  1. Subclass HealthBackend in backends/<your_backend>.py
  2. Implement the 7 abstract probe methods (one per component)
  3. Register in backends/__init__.py
  4. Add tests in tests/test_backend_<your_backend>.py

Bug reports + feature requests: open a GitHub issue.


License

MIT — see LICENSE.


Related


Built by Temur Khan — independent practitioner on production AI systems. Contact: temur@pixelette.tech

推荐服务器

Baidu Map

Baidu Map

百度地图核心API现已全面兼容MCP协议,是国内首家兼容MCP协议的地图服务商。

官方
精选
JavaScript
Playwright MCP Server

Playwright MCP Server

一个模型上下文协议服务器,它使大型语言模型能够通过结构化的可访问性快照与网页进行交互,而无需视觉模型或屏幕截图。

官方
精选
TypeScript
Magic Component Platform (MCP)

Magic Component Platform (MCP)

一个由人工智能驱动的工具,可以从自然语言描述生成现代化的用户界面组件,并与流行的集成开发环境(IDE)集成,从而简化用户界面开发流程。

官方
精选
本地
TypeScript
Audiense Insights MCP Server

Audiense Insights MCP Server

通过模型上下文协议启用与 Audiense Insights 账户的交互,从而促进营销洞察和受众数据的提取和分析,包括人口统计信息、行为和影响者互动。

官方
精选
本地
TypeScript
VeyraX

VeyraX

一个单一的 MCP 工具,连接你所有喜爱的工具:Gmail、日历以及其他 40 多个工具。

官方
精选
本地
graphlit-mcp-server

graphlit-mcp-server

模型上下文协议 (MCP) 服务器实现了 MCP 客户端与 Graphlit 服务之间的集成。 除了网络爬取之外,还可以将任何内容(从 Slack 到 Gmail 再到播客订阅源)导入到 Graphlit 项目中,然后从 MCP 客户端检索相关内容。

官方
精选
TypeScript
Kagi MCP Server

Kagi MCP Server

一个 MCP 服务器,集成了 Kagi 搜索功能和 Claude AI,使 Claude 能够在回答需要最新信息的问题时执行实时网络搜索。

官方
精选
Python
e2b-mcp-server

e2b-mcp-server

使用 MCP 通过 e2b 运行代码。

官方
精选
Neon MCP Server

Neon MCP Server

用于与 Neon 管理 API 和数据库交互的 MCP 服务器

官方
精选
Exa MCP Server

Exa MCP Server

模型上下文协议(MCP)服务器允许像 Claude 这样的 AI 助手使用 Exa AI 搜索 API 进行网络搜索。这种设置允许 AI 模型以安全和受控的方式获取实时的网络信息。

官方
精选