openclaw-skill-vetter-mcp
Vet ClawHub skills before installing them; detects prompt-injection, exfiltration, and other security issues, outputting a risk score with per-finding evidence.
README
openclaw-skill-vetter-mcp
<!-- mcp-name: io.github.temurkhan13/openclaw-skill-vetter-mcp -->
MCP server for security-vetting third-party AI agent extensions before installation — Claude skills, ClawHub plugins, agent tool packs, any code-shaped artifact that runs in your agent environment with your API keys. 41 detection rules across prompt-injection patterns, hardcoded exfiltration channels (Discord/Slack/Telegram webhooks, SSH-key reads, AWS-creds reads), dangerous dynamic execution (
eval,exec,subprocess shell=True, pickle.loads), manifest/permission drift, and known typosquat dependencies. Outputs a 0-100 risk score + BLOCK/REVIEW/CAUTION/CLEAN bucket + per-finding evidence. Native ClawHub manifest support; the rule engine generalizes to any code-shaped extension via Custom MCP Build adapters. Keywords: AI agent security, plugin vetting, supply-chain security, prompt injection detection, MCP static analysis.
What it does
Third-party AI agent extensions — Claude skills, ClawHub plugins, MCP servers themselves, agent tool packs, npm-distributed agent code — are code that runs inside your environment with your API keys, your filesystem access, your network egress. The supply-chain attack surface is now broadly recognized:
- The OWASP MCP Top 10 catalogues prompt injection, command injection, and "rug pull" attacks where compromised MCP servers update with malicious tool definitions after user approval. Microsoft, Datadog, Atlassian, Palo Alto Unit 42, and Prompt Security have all published detailed threat analyses in 2026: see Datadog's MCP risks blog, Atlassian's MCP Clients risk awareness, and Unit 42's MCP sampling attack vectors.
- The 2026 ClawHavoc campaign distributed hundreds of skills with prompt-injection payloads, hardcoded webhooks, and typosquatted dependencies. Per public post-mortem analysis: 36% of ClawHub skills carried injection patterns, 8% were actively exfiltrating data.
The same shape of attack works against any third-party extension a user installs into their AI agent runtime — Claude skills, MCP servers, browser-extension agents, npm-distributed agent code. The defensive question every operator faces before clicking install: "is this safe to run with my API keys?"
This MCP server runs a battery of static-analysis scanners against any skill's directory and produces a single VetReport that an operator can act on:
> claude: vet the data-extractor skill before I install it.
[MCP tool: vet_skill]
Skill 'data-extractor': BLOCK — do not install.
Risk score: 100/100. Findings: 1 critical, 4 high, 1 info.
Critical:
EXFIL.WEBHOOK_DISCORD (extract.py:5) —
Hardcoded Discord webhook URL: 'https://discord.com/api/webhooks/...'
Recommendation: Refuse install unless explicitly justified.
High:
AST.OS_SYSTEM (extract.py:14) — os.system('curl ... | bash')
EXFIL.ENV_DUMP (extract.py:9) — dumps full os.environ
MANIFEST.WILDCARD_PERMISSION — `network.http: *`
...
Vet result for data-extractor: REFUSE INSTALL.
> claude: any flagged skills currently installed?
[MCP tool: flagged_skills_report]
2 skills flagged at REVIEW or BLOCK:
- data-extractor BLOCK risk_score=100 1 CRITICAL EXFIL.WEBHOOK_DISCORD
- markdown-formatter REVIEW risk_score=35 1 HIGH AST.EVAL_CALL on user input
Why openclaw-skill-vetter-mcp
Three things existing tools (manual code review, generic SAST, ClawHub trust scores) don't do:
-
Skill-aware scanning. Generic SAST tools don't know what an OpenClaw skill manifest looks like. They miss the most common malware shape: a "calculator" skill that requests
network.http: *. The vetter cross-checks declared purpose against requested permissions. -
Risk score the operator can paste into a ticket. Not "high cyclomatic complexity" —
BLOCK — Discord webhook at extract.py:5. Each finding hasrule_id,file:line,evidence, and a specific recommendation. -
Built for review-before-install, not after-the-fact audit. Run it from inside Claude on a skill you're about to add. Get a verdict in seconds. Refuse the install if it's BLOCK; sandbox-test if REVIEW; install if CLEAN.
Built for the production-AI operator who has been bitten (or doesn't want to be) by ClawHavoc-style supply-chain attacks.
Tool surface
| Tool | What it returns |
|---|---|
vet_skill |
Full VetReport for one skill: risk_score, risk_level, sorted findings, summary |
vet_skill_directory |
Aggregate report across every skill in the directory + per-bucket counts |
installed_skills_overview |
Lightweight: just bucket counts + flagged skill IDs |
flagged_skills_report |
Just REVIEW + BLOCK skills with their findings |
scan_for_prompt_injection |
Focused: only prompt-injection findings on one skill |
scan_for_exfiltration |
Focused: only exfiltration findings on one skill |
list_detection_rules |
Catalog of every rule the server applies (transparency) |
Resources:
skill-vetter://overview— installed-skills risk overviewskill-vetter://flagged— currently-flagged skillsskill-vetter://rules— detection rules catalog
Prompts:
pre-install-skill-check— vet a specific skill before installationweekly-skill-audit— compose a 200-word weekly audit of all installed skills
Quickstart
Install
pip install openclaw-skill-vetter-mcp
Configure for Claude Desktop
Add to ~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json (macOS) or %APPDATA%\Claude\claude_desktop_config.json (Windows):
{
"mcpServers": {
"openclaw-skill-vetter": {
"command": "python",
"args": ["-m", "openclaw_skill_vetter_mcp"],
"env": {
"OPENCLAW_SKILL_VETTER_BACKEND": "mock"
}
}
}
}
Backends
| Backend | Status | Description |
|---|---|---|
mock |
✅ v1.0 | 6 demo skills with deliberate findings spanning all severities — for protocol verification and README/CLI demos |
openclaw-skills-dir |
✅ v1.0 | Reads ~/.openclaw/skills/ (override via OPENCLAW_SKILLS_DIR); each subdirectory is parsed as one skill |
clawhub-fetch |
⏳ v1.1 | Fetches a candidate skill from the ClawHub registry directly for vet-before-install workflows |
Skill manifest format
Each skill directory contains a skill.yaml (or skill.json):
id: weather-fetch
name: Weather Fetch
version: 1.0.0
author: verified-publisher@openclaw.example
description: Fetches current weather for a city using OpenWeatherMap.
purpose: Live weather data lookup
runtime: python3.11
entry_point: main.py
permissions:
- network.http: api.openweathermap.org
dependencies:
- requests>=2.31
- pydantic>=2.0
signature: ed25519:abcd1234efgh5678
Plus the actual code files (*.py, *.js, *.ts, *.sh, *.rb, *.go, *.rs) and any prompt files (*.prompt, *.md, *.txt).
If your OpenClaw deployment uses a different on-disk shape, see the Custom MCP Build section below.
Detection rules (v1.0)
Four scanner modules cover the v1.0 ruleset:
Manifest — MANIFEST.MISSING, MANIFEST.PURPOSE_NETWORK_DRIFT, MANIFEST.WILDCARD_PERMISSION, MANIFEST.BROAD_FILESYSTEM_WRITE, MANIFEST.EMPTY_DESCRIPTION, MANIFEST.NO_AUTHOR, MANIFEST.UNSIGNED
Static patterns (text regex over code + prompts) —
- Prompt-injection:
PROMPT_INJ.IGNORE_PRIOR,PROMPT_INJ.ROLE_OVERRIDE,PROMPT_INJ.EXTRACT_SYSTEM,PROMPT_INJ.JAILBREAK_DAN,PROMPT_INJ.NEW_USER_MARKER - Exfiltration:
EXFIL.WEBHOOK_DISCORD,EXFIL.WEBHOOK_SLACK,EXFIL.WEBHOOK_TELEGRAM,EXFIL.PASTEBIN_LITERAL,EXFIL.SSH_KEY_READ,EXFIL.AWS_CREDS_READ,EXFIL.ENV_DUMP,EXFIL.SUBPROCESS_CURL - Dynamic execution:
DYN_EXEC.SHELL_TRUE,DYN_EXEC.OS_SYSTEM,DYN_EXEC.EVAL_LITERAL,DYN_EXEC.EXEC_LITERAL,DYN_EXEC.PICKLE_LOADS,DYN_EXEC.DYNAMIC_IMPORT - Obfuscation:
OBFUSCATION.LARGE_BASE64,OBFUSCATION.LARGE_HEX
Python AST (catches what regex misses) — AST.EVAL_CALL, AST.EXEC_CALL, AST.COMPILE_CALL, AST.OS_SYSTEM, AST.OS_POPEN, AST.OS_EXECV, AST.SUBPROCESS_RUN_SHELL_TRUE, AST.SUBPROCESS_POPEN_SHELL_TRUE, AST.DYNAMIC_IMPORT
Dependencies — DEP.TYPOSQUAT, DEP.HOMOGLYPH, DEP.UNTRUSTED_GIT_SOURCE, DEP.LOCAL_PATH
Use list_detection_rules to query the live catalog.
Risk scoring
Each finding contributes by severity:
| Severity | Weight |
|---|---|
| CRITICAL | 40 |
| HIGH | 15 |
| MEDIUM | 5 |
| LOW | 1 |
| INFO | 0 |
Final risk_score = min(sum, 100). Bucketing (first match wins):
| Bucket | Trigger |
|---|---|
| BLOCK | ≥1 CRITICAL or score ≥ 80 |
| REVIEW | ≥1 HIGH or score ≥ 50 |
| CAUTION | ≥1 MEDIUM or score ≥ 20 |
| CLEAN | no findings or only INFO |
Conservative-by-design: false positives are OK, missed criticals are not. If your operator workflow disagrees with a specific rule, you can filter by category on the client side, or fork + customize.
Roadmap
| Version | Scope | Status |
|---|---|---|
| v1.0 | mock + openclaw-skills-dir backends, 7 tools / 3 resources / 2 prompts, 4 scanner modules with 41 detection rules, GitHub Actions CI matrix, PyPI Trusted Publishing | ✅ |
| v1.1 | clawhub-fetch backend (vet a skill from ClawHub before install); CVE-DB lookup for dependencies; signature verification against ClawHub publisher keys |
⏳ |
| v1.2 | Sandbox-execution scanner (run skill in isolated process, observe network attempts); whitelist/allowlist per-operator | ⏳ |
| v1.x | Custom rule packs; integration with existing SAST tools; per-rule severity overrides | ⏳ |
Need this adapted to your stack?
If your AI deployment doesn't use the OpenClaw skill format — different agent harness, custom skill schema, monolithic skill files, internal-registry distribution — and you want the same vet-before-install discipline, that's a Custom MCP Build engagement.
| Tier | Scope | Investment | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simple | Single backend adapter for your existing skill format | $8,000–$12,000 | 1–2 weeks |
| Standard | Custom backend + custom rule pack tuned to your ecosystem + CI integration | $15,000–$25,000 | 2–4 weeks |
| Complex | Multi-format ingestion + sandbox-execution + signed-publisher allowlist + rule-tuning workshop | $30,000–$45,000 | 4–8 weeks |
To engage:
- Email temur@pixelette.tech with subject
Custom MCP Build inquiry — skill vetting - Include: 1-paragraph description of your skill ecosystem + which tier you're considering
- Reply within 2 business days with a 30-min discovery call slot
This server is part of a production-AI infrastructure MCP suite — companion to silentwatch-mcp, openclaw-health-mcp, and openclaw-cost-tracker-mcp. Install all four for full operational visibility.
Production AI audits
If you're running production AI and want an outside practitioner to score readiness, find the failure patterns already present (ClawHavoc-style skill malware being one of the most damaging), and write the corrective-action plan:
| Tier | Scope | Investment | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Audit Lite | One system, top-5 findings, written report | $1,500 | 1 week |
| Audit Standard | Full audit, all 14 patterns, 5 Cs findings, 90-day follow-up | $3,000 | 2–3 weeks |
| Audit + Workshop | Standard audit + 2-day team workshop + first monthly audit included | $7,500 | 3–4 weeks |
Same email channel: temur@pixelette.tech with subject AI audit inquiry.
Contributing
PRs welcome. Scanners are pluggable — see src/openclaw_skill_vetter_mcp/scanners/ for the contract.
To add a new scanner:
- Create
scanners/<your_scanner>.pyexportingSCANNER_NAME: stranddef scan(skill: Skill) -> list[Finding] - Optionally export
def all_rules() -> list[tuple[...]]for the rules catalog - Register in
analysis.vet_skill(the orchestrator iterates over a fixed tuple of scanner modules) - Add tests in
tests/test_scanners.py
To add a new backend:
- Subclass
SkillBackendinbackends/<your_backend>.py - Implement
get_skills,get_skill_by_id,get_directory - Register in
backends/__init__.py - Add tests in
tests/test_backend_<your_backend>.py
Bug reports + feature requests: open a GitHub issue. False-positive reports: include the skill snippet that fired the wrong rule and we'll tune.
License
MIT — see LICENSE.
Related
- Production-AI MCP Suite (Gumroad bundle) — this server plus 4 others in one curated bundle with a decision tree, day-one drill, and Custom MCP Build CTA. $99, or $49 with
LAUNCH50for the first 30 days. - silentwatch-mcp — cron silent-failure detection
- openclaw-health-mcp — deployment health
- openclaw-cost-tracker-mcp — token-cost telemetry
- openclaw-upgrade-orchestrator-mcp — read-only upgrade advisor
- AI Production Discipline Framework — Notion template, $29 — methodology these MCPs implement
- SPEC.md — full server design
Built by Temur Khan — independent practitioner on production AI systems. Contact: temur@pixelette.tech
推荐服务器
Baidu Map
百度地图核心API现已全面兼容MCP协议,是国内首家兼容MCP协议的地图服务商。
Playwright MCP Server
一个模型上下文协议服务器,它使大型语言模型能够通过结构化的可访问性快照与网页进行交互,而无需视觉模型或屏幕截图。
Magic Component Platform (MCP)
一个由人工智能驱动的工具,可以从自然语言描述生成现代化的用户界面组件,并与流行的集成开发环境(IDE)集成,从而简化用户界面开发流程。
Audiense Insights MCP Server
通过模型上下文协议启用与 Audiense Insights 账户的交互,从而促进营销洞察和受众数据的提取和分析,包括人口统计信息、行为和影响者互动。
VeyraX
一个单一的 MCP 工具,连接你所有喜爱的工具:Gmail、日历以及其他 40 多个工具。
graphlit-mcp-server
模型上下文协议 (MCP) 服务器实现了 MCP 客户端与 Graphlit 服务之间的集成。 除了网络爬取之外,还可以将任何内容(从 Slack 到 Gmail 再到播客订阅源)导入到 Graphlit 项目中,然后从 MCP 客户端检索相关内容。
Kagi MCP Server
一个 MCP 服务器,集成了 Kagi 搜索功能和 Claude AI,使 Claude 能够在回答需要最新信息的问题时执行实时网络搜索。
e2b-mcp-server
使用 MCP 通过 e2b 运行代码。
Neon MCP Server
用于与 Neon 管理 API 和数据库交互的 MCP 服务器
Exa MCP Server
模型上下文协议(MCP)服务器允许像 Claude 这样的 AI 助手使用 Exa AI 搜索 API 进行网络搜索。这种设置允许 AI 模型以安全和受控的方式获取实时的网络信息。