permitd MCP Server

permitd MCP Server

Gates agent tool execution with human approval, audit trails, and replay-resistant permits, enabling safe use of tools in agent loops.

Category
访问服务器

README

permitd

Governed tool execution for agent loops.

An agent proposes a gated call, a human approves it in another terminal, the call executes, and the audit lines land

Your agent loop wants to send the email, write the file, hit the API. You want a human decision in between — one that an agent cannot fake, replay, or bend to different arguments — and a line in an audit log either way.

propose(tool, args) ──> permit (signed, TTL, single-use)
                   ──> approve   (a human, out-of-band: CLI, or any callable)
                   ──> execute   (verify + burn, atomically)
                   ──> one audit line lands (append-only JSONL)

permitd is that flow as a small, stdlib-only Python library. It is also loop state: the permit lives in SQLite, so a call proposed in turn N of your agent loop is approved from another terminal and executed in turn N+K — across restarts, across processes.

Every non-execute outcome is fail-closed. A missing, expired, denied, tampered, argument-mismatched, or already-used permit is refused, and the refusal is audited too.

Install

pip install permitd

Python ≥ 3.10, zero dependencies.

Sixty seconds, two terminals

Terminal 1 — the agent side (agent.py):

import time
from permitd import Gate, RED

gate = Gate(db="permitd.db")

@gate.tool(tier=RED, description="send a message to someone")
def send_message(to, body):
    return f"delivered to {to}: {body!r}"

args = {"to": "alice", "body": "hello from the loop"}
r = gate.call("send_message", args)
print(r.error)                       # "... permit PRM-xxxx is proposed ..."

pid = r.permit["id"]
while gate.get(pid).status == "proposed":   # this state survives restarts
    time.sleep(1)

r = gate.call("send_message", args, permit_id=pid)
print(r.result if r.ok else r.error)
python agent.py

Terminal 2 — the human side:

$ permitd pending
1 pending permit(s):
  PRM-3f9c21ab44de  [proposed]  send_message
      args: {"to": "alice", "body": "hello from the loop"}
      proposed: 2026-07-29T18:12:03+00:00  ttl: 300s

$ permitd approve PRM-3f9c21ab44de
approved — PRM-3f9c21ab44de is executable for 300s, single use, bound to exactly these arguments

Terminal 1 wakes up and prints delivered to alice: 'hello from the loop'. The trail:

$ permitd audit
{"ts": "...", "event": "proposed", "permit_id": "PRM-3f9c21ab44de", "tool": "send_message", ...}
{"ts": "...", "event": "approved", "permit_id": "PRM-3f9c21ab44de", ...}
{"ts": "...", "event": "executed", "permit_id": "PRM-3f9c21ab44de", "ok": true}

That is the whole product: propose, approve, execute, audit line.

What the permit actually guarantees

  • Bound to exact arguments. A permit is scoped to sha256(tool + canonical_json(args)). Approval for "send X to Alice" cannot be replayed as "send Y to Eve" — key order and whitespace don't change the binding; any value change does (args_mismatch).
  • Single-use, atomically. The burn is one SQLite compare-and-swap (UPDATE ... WHERE status='approved'), so two processes racing the same permit cannot both pass (already_used).
  • Time-boxed twice. A proposal is approvable for ttl_seconds (default 300); a minted approval is executable for another ttl_seconds. Unparseable timestamps count as expired.
  • HMAC-signed. Approval mints HMAC-SHA256(secret, id.binding_hash.approved_at), re-verified at execute time — a store row edited behind the kernel's back fails (bad_signature).
  • Fail-closed everywhere. Anything the kernel cannot positively verify — including "the arguments could not even be inspected" — is a refusal, not a pass. Refusals are audited with their reason.

Tiers

Gate is a small registry with three tiers over the kernel:

tier meaning gate
GREEN read-only over your own state runs freely, audited
YELLOW external read (search, fetch) one standing toggle: gate.standing_authorization = True
RED write / exec / send per-call permit: the flow above

If you don't want the registry, use the kernel directly:

from permitd import PermitKernel, SqliteStore, AuditLog

kernel = PermitKernel(SqliteStore("permitd.db"),
                      secret_path="permitd.db.secret",
                      audit=AuditLog("permitd_audit.jsonl"))
p = kernel.propose("deploy", {"target": "prod"})
kernel.approve(p.id)                      # or from the CLI / your own UI
kernel.execute("deploy", {"target": "prod"}, p.id, runner=do_deploy)

approve is just a method on a store-backed kernel — call it from a CLI, a Slack handler, an HTTP endpoint, wherever your human is.

The egress guard

Before any non-GREEN call runs — including at propose time — its arguments are scanned for credential-shaped content: private-key blocks, Bearer/Basic headers, AWS/GitHub/Slack/Stripe/OpenAI/Anthropic/Google key shapes, inline api_key=... assignments, the values of this process's own sensitive environment variables, and a conservative high-entropy backstop. A poisoned context that steers a secret into a tool argument is refused before anything leaves, before any approval card is shown, and the refusal reason names the matched shape, never the value.

MCP: gate any agent's tools, including Claude Code's

examples/mcp_server/ is an MCP server whose tools go through the gate. Point any MCP-speaking agent at it and that agent gets propose → approve → execute + audit with zero agent-side changes: the agent calls a RED tool, is told "permit PRM-… proposed, waiting for approval", you run permitd approve PRM-… in another terminal, the agent retries and the call executes. The audit line lands either way.

Storage

SqliteStore (default, durable, atomic burn) and MemoryStore (tests, ephemeral) ship in the box. Anything else needs five methods — see the PermitStore protocol in store.py; keep burn compare-and-swap or you lose the one-shot guarantee. The audit trail is a separate append-only JSONL file so it stays tail -f-able.

What permitd is not

Not an agent, not a framework, not memory, not RAG. It has no opinion about your loop, your model, or your prompts. It is the layer that holds the state of "may this run?" across turns — and the receipt after it did.

Ancestry

Extracted from the tool-governance kernel of brainfoundry-nous, where it runs in production gating a personal AI node's tools. The propose/confirm/execute + audit grammar goes back to hbar.brain.console (2026-03). Design notes: DESIGN.md.

License

MIT.

推荐服务器

Baidu Map

Baidu Map

百度地图核心API现已全面兼容MCP协议,是国内首家兼容MCP协议的地图服务商。

官方
精选
JavaScript
Playwright MCP Server

Playwright MCP Server

一个模型上下文协议服务器,它使大型语言模型能够通过结构化的可访问性快照与网页进行交互,而无需视觉模型或屏幕截图。

官方
精选
TypeScript
Magic Component Platform (MCP)

Magic Component Platform (MCP)

一个由人工智能驱动的工具,可以从自然语言描述生成现代化的用户界面组件,并与流行的集成开发环境(IDE)集成,从而简化用户界面开发流程。

官方
精选
本地
TypeScript
Audiense Insights MCP Server

Audiense Insights MCP Server

通过模型上下文协议启用与 Audiense Insights 账户的交互,从而促进营销洞察和受众数据的提取和分析,包括人口统计信息、行为和影响者互动。

官方
精选
本地
TypeScript
VeyraX

VeyraX

一个单一的 MCP 工具,连接你所有喜爱的工具:Gmail、日历以及其他 40 多个工具。

官方
精选
本地
graphlit-mcp-server

graphlit-mcp-server

模型上下文协议 (MCP) 服务器实现了 MCP 客户端与 Graphlit 服务之间的集成。 除了网络爬取之外,还可以将任何内容(从 Slack 到 Gmail 再到播客订阅源)导入到 Graphlit 项目中,然后从 MCP 客户端检索相关内容。

官方
精选
TypeScript
Kagi MCP Server

Kagi MCP Server

一个 MCP 服务器,集成了 Kagi 搜索功能和 Claude AI,使 Claude 能够在回答需要最新信息的问题时执行实时网络搜索。

官方
精选
Python
e2b-mcp-server

e2b-mcp-server

使用 MCP 通过 e2b 运行代码。

官方
精选
Neon MCP Server

Neon MCP Server

用于与 Neon 管理 API 和数据库交互的 MCP 服务器

官方
精选
Exa MCP Server

Exa MCP Server

模型上下文协议(MCP)服务器允许像 Claude 这样的 AI 助手使用 Exa AI 搜索 API 进行网络搜索。这种设置允许 AI 模型以安全和受控的方式获取实时的网络信息。

官方
精选