phi-redact-mcp

phi-redact-mcp

An MCP server that redacts PII/PHI from text before it ever reaches an LLM — self-hosted, fail-closed, and HIPAA-aware.

Category
访问服务器

README

<!-- mcp-name: io.github.rinava/phi-mcp -->

phi-redact-mcp

An MCP server that redacts PII/PHI from text before it ever reaches an LLM — self-hosted, fail-closed, and HIPAA-aware.

PyPI version Tests Python versions License: MIT Ruff PRs welcome

Teams building LLM and agent pipelines in regulated domains have no clean, drop-in way to strip PHI/PII from a payload before it crosses into a model provider's infrastructure. phi-redact-mcp is that boundary: three MCP tools — redact, restore, detect — that scrub sensitive values into reversible placeholders, run entirely inside infrastructure you control, and block the request if detection is uncertain instead of leaking data.

redact("Patient MRN: 1234567, provider NPI 1234567893, ssn 078-05-1120, john.doe@example.com")

  redacted_text  (safe to send to the model):
    "Patient MRN: [MEDICAL_RECORD_NUMBER_1], provider NPI [NPI_1], ssn [US_SSN_1], [EMAIL_ADDRESS_1]"

  token_map      (kept local, never sent to the model):
    [MEDICAL_RECORD_NUMBER_1] → 1234567
    [NPI_1]                   → 1234567893
    [US_SSN_1]                → 078-05-1120
    [EMAIL_ADDRESS_1]         → john.doe@example.com

Send the redacted text to the model; keep the token_map local; call restore afterward to rehydrate the result. Round-trips are byte-exact and proven with property-based tests.


Why this exists

The PHI/PII-redaction MCP niche is real but underserved — the existing options are thin Presidio wrappers with no HIPAA-specific detection and, critically, no guarantee that a detection failure blocks the request instead of silently passing raw data through. So teams either roll their own boundary or ship sensitive data to a provider and lean on a BAA to cover it — the design-time mistake that causes real compliance incidents.

Naive Presidio wrapper Regex-in-your-app Cloud DLP API phi-redact-mcp
Drop-in MCP tools sometimes ❌ ❌ ✅
Fail-closed on uncertain detection ❌ ❌ ❌ ✅
HIPAA identifiers (NPI, DEA, MBI, MRN, CLIA) ❌ partial partial ✅
Reversible (restore original) rarely DIY some ✅
Runs self-hosted, zero egress ✅ ✅ ❌ (sends data out) ✅
Works with zero heavy deps ❌ (needs spaCy) ✅ n/a ✅ (regex engine)
Optional ML NER (names, addresses) ✅ ❌ ✅ ✅ ([presidio] extra)

Why it was built: MCP went mainstream fast — it's now first-class in Claude, Cursor, and ChatGPT, across thousands of servers — but the PHI/PII-redaction corner was left to a few unmaintained wrappers. This fills that gap with a single honest, auditable, fail-closed boundary, kept open source so the redaction logic you depend on is fully inspectable rather than a black box.

Features

  • Three tools, one boundary — redact (→ scrubbed text + reversible token map), restore (→ original), detect (→ entities found, no mutation).
  • Fail-closed by construction — if detection errors or any detection lands below the confidence threshold, the call returns a typed error. Uncertainty blocks; it never redacts-what-it-can and passes the rest.
  • HIPAA-aware detection — checksum-validated NPI and DEA, position-typed Medicare MBI, context-anchored MRN, CLIA lab IDs, plus standard PII (email, phone, SSN, credit card, IP, URL).
  • Zero-egress, self-hosted — the default engine is pure regex + checksums with no network calls and no heavy dependencies. It installs anywhere Python does.
  • Optional ML upgrade — pip install "phi-redact-mcp[presidio]" adds Microsoft Presidio + spaCy for PERSON/LOCATION NER, transparently.
  • Reversible & deterministic — collision-proof typed placeholders make restore(redact(x)) == x for arbitrary input; same input + config always yields the same output.

When to use it (and when not to)

Reach for phi-redact-mcp when:

  • You send healthcare, clinical, financial, or user-generated text to a third-party LLM API and need PHI/PII kept out of that provider's infrastructure and logs.
  • You're building an agent or MCP pipeline in a regulated domain and want a drop-in scrubbing boundary you wire in with one tool call.
  • You need reversible redaction so downstream steps still work: redact → send to model → restore.
  • You want a self-hosted, no-egress detector you can audit line by line.
  • You need HIPAA-specific identifiers (NPI, DEA, Medicare MBI, MRN, CLIA), not just names and emails.

Reach for something else when:

  • You need irreversible de-identification / anonymization (tokenization, k-anonymity) — redaction here is reversible by design.
  • You need to redact non-text data (images, audio, PDFs, database rows) — scope is text.
  • You want a certified compliance product — this is one technical control, not a compliance program (see Scope & honest limitations).
  • You want a transparent proxy that auto-scrubs everything in the request path — v1 is explicit tool calls; proxy mode is on the roadmap.
  • You require guaranteed 100% recall — no detector, this one included, can promise that.

Quickstart (< 60 seconds)

pip install phi-redact-mcp        # zero heavy deps; runs immediately

Then register it with your MCP client.

Claude Desktop / Claude Code (claude_desktop_config.json, or claude mcp add phi-redact -- phi-redact-mcp):

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "phi-redact": {
      "command": "phi-redact-mcp"
    }
  }
}

Cursor (.cursor/mcp.json) and VS Code use the same shape — see examples/ for ready-to-paste configs.

Want name/address detection too?

pip install "phi-redact-mcp[presidio]"
python -m spacy download en_core_web_lg

The server auto-detects Presidio and upgrades — no config change needed. (Set PHI_MCP_ENGINE=regex to force the dependency-free engine, or =presidio to require the ML one.)

How it works

A tool call comes in over stdio; the Redactor core runs the configured detection engine, resolves overlaps deterministically, applies the fail-closed threshold check, and swaps detected spans for reversible typed placeholders. Only scrubbed text is meant to leave the boundary you run.

flowchart LR
    A[MCP client<br/>Claude · Cursor · agent] -- redact / restore / detect --> B[phi-redact-mcp<br/>stdio server]
    B --> C[Redactor core<br/>fail-closed · reversible]
    C --> D{Detection engine}
    D -->|default, zero deps| E[Regex + checksums]
    D -->|optional| F[Presidio + spaCy NER]
    C -. scrubbed text .-> A
    A -- scrubbed text only --> G[(LLM / downstream)]

The Redactor core depends only on a small DetectionEngine interface — never on Presidio or MCP directly. Raw data and the detection engine stay inside the boundary you run; only scrubbed text leaves it. See docs/ARCHITECTURE.md and docs/THREAT_MODEL.md.

The tools

redact(text) → { redacted_text, token_map, entities }

Replaces detected PHI/PII with typed placeholders like [NPI_1]. token_map maps each placeholder back to its original value — keep it local; never send it to the model. entities lists what was redacted (type/span/score) for auditing.

restore(redacted_text, token_map) → { text }

Reverses a redaction, recovering the original text exactly. Safe to call on model output that still contains the placeholders.

detect(text) → { entities, count }

Reports the entities found — type, span, confidence — without modifying the text. Unlike redact, it surfaces low-confidence hits rather than blocking, so you can inspect coverage before trusting the boundary in a pipeline.

How to use it (a real pipeline)

The pattern is redact → model → restore, with the token map never leaving your side:

  1. Scrub before the model. Call redact(user_text). Send only redacted_text to the LLM. Keep token_map in your process — treat it as sensitively as the raw input, and never pass it to the model.
  2. Let the model work on placeholders. It sees [NPI_1], [US_SSN_1], etc. — semantically neutral tokens it can reason about and echo back.
  3. Rehydrate after. Call restore(model_output, token_map) to swap the real values back into the model's response before it reaches your user or database.
  4. Handle the block. If redact returns a [LOW_CONFIDENCE] or [DETECTION_ERROR] tool error, the boundary refused to leak — surface it, tighten input, or lower the risk, but don't send the raw text onward.

Before trusting it in a pipeline, call detect(sample_text) on representative (synthetic) data to see exactly what is and isn't caught, and tune the thresholds (below) to your risk tolerance.

Fail-closed, precisely

Two thresholds govern every redact call:

  • detection_floor (default 0.35) — the sensitivity boundary. Signals below it are treated as noise.
  • min_confidence (default 0.5) — the trust threshold.

Any candidate that survives the floor but scores below min_confidence puts the call into fail-closed mode: it returns a [LOW_CONFIDENCE] error rather than redacting the confident spans and passing the uncertain one through. Engine errors return [DETECTION_ERROR]. On any error, no redacted text is returned. Both thresholds are configurable (see below).

Configuration

All optional; sane defaults mean it runs with zero config. Set via the client's env block.

Variable Default Meaning
PHI_MCP_ENGINE auto auto (Presidio if installed, else regex), regex, or presidio
PHI_MCP_MIN_CONFIDENCE 0.5 Trust threshold; detections below it fail closed
PHI_MCP_DETECTION_FLOOR 0.35 Below this, a signal is treated as noise
PHI_MCP_MAX_INPUT_CHARS 100000 Reject larger input with a typed error
PHI_MCP_SPACY_MODEL en_core_web_lg spaCy model for the Presidio engine

Entity coverage

Entity Regex engine (default) Presidio engine ([presidio])
Email, Phone, SSN, Credit card, IP, URL ✅ ✅
NPI (Luhn + 80840 check digit) ✅ ✅
DEA (check digit) ✅ ✅
Medicare MBI (position-typed) ✅ ✅
MRN (context-anchored) ✅ ✅
CLIA lab number ✅ ✅
Person names ❌ ✅ (spaCy NER)
Addresses / locations ❌ ✅ (spaCy NER)

Detection quality is measured, not asserted — see the eval harness. On the synthetic corpus the default engine clears the project bar (recall ≥ 0.90, precision ≥ 0.80) on the HIPAA identifier set.

Scope & honest limitations

This tool reduces PHI/PII exposure at one boundary. It does not make a system "HIPAA compliant." Compliance is a property of an entire system and organization — its policies, contracts, access controls, audit posture, and people — not of any single library. Running phi-redact-mcp can be part of a compliant design, but it is not a certification, a guarantee, or a substitute for a Business Associate Agreement, a risk assessment, or legal counsel.

Concretely, this project does not: guarantee 100% detection (no detector does), de-identify beyond reversible redaction, cover non-text data, or act as a transparent proxy in v1 (redaction is via explicit tool calls you wire in). No detector is perfect — evaluate on your own representative data before relying on it. See docs/THREAT_MODEL.md for the full boundary, assumptions, and residual risks, and SECURITY.md to report issues.

How to contribute

Contributions are very welcome — this is a deliberately friendly place to make your first open-source PR, and the maintainer tries to respond quickly.

The easiest high-value contribution: add a detection recognizer for a new identifier (a regex + an optional check-digit validator + a test). The add-a-recognizer issue form doubles as the spec, and CONTRIBUTING.md walks through the six steps.

Other good ways to help: improve docs, add test cases or example client configs, or pick up something from the roadmap. Browse good first issues or open an issue to propose something.

git clone https://github.com/Rinava/phi-mcp && cd phi-mcp
pip install -e ".[dev]"
pytest                 # fast invariant suite (Presidio faked, sub-second)
ruff check . && mypy src/phi_mcp
python eval/run_eval.py

The full guide — dev setup, conventions, and the no-real-PHI rule for fixtures — is in CONTRIBUTING.md. By contributing you agree your work is MIT-licensed.

License

MIT — matches Presidio and maximizes reuse. Built with Microsoft Presidio (optional) and the MCP Python SDK.

推荐服务器

Baidu Map

Baidu Map

百度地图核心API现已全面兼容MCP协议,是国内首家兼容MCP协议的地图服务商。

官方
精选
JavaScript
Playwright MCP Server

Playwright MCP Server

一个模型上下文协议服务器,它使大型语言模型能够通过结构化的可访问性快照与网页进行交互,而无需视觉模型或屏幕截图。

官方
精选
TypeScript
Magic Component Platform (MCP)

Magic Component Platform (MCP)

一个由人工智能驱动的工具,可以从自然语言描述生成现代化的用户界面组件,并与流行的集成开发环境(IDE)集成,从而简化用户界面开发流程。

官方
精选
本地
TypeScript
Audiense Insights MCP Server

Audiense Insights MCP Server

通过模型上下文协议启用与 Audiense Insights 账户的交互,从而促进营销洞察和受众数据的提取和分析,包括人口统计信息、行为和影响者互动。

官方
精选
本地
TypeScript
VeyraX

VeyraX

一个单一的 MCP 工具,连接你所有喜爱的工具:Gmail、日历以及其他 40 多个工具。

官方
精选
本地
graphlit-mcp-server

graphlit-mcp-server

模型上下文协议 (MCP) 服务器实现了 MCP 客户端与 Graphlit 服务之间的集成。 除了网络爬取之外,还可以将任何内容(从 Slack 到 Gmail 再到播客订阅源)导入到 Graphlit 项目中,然后从 MCP 客户端检索相关内容。

官方
精选
TypeScript
Kagi MCP Server

Kagi MCP Server

一个 MCP 服务器,集成了 Kagi 搜索功能和 Claude AI,使 Claude 能够在回答需要最新信息的问题时执行实时网络搜索。

官方
精选
Python
e2b-mcp-server

e2b-mcp-server

使用 MCP 通过 e2b 运行代码。

官方
精选
Neon MCP Server

Neon MCP Server

用于与 Neon 管理 API 和数据库交互的 MCP 服务器

官方
精选
Exa MCP Server

Exa MCP Server

模型上下文协议(MCP)服务器允许像 Claude 这样的 AI 助手使用 Exa AI 搜索 API 进行网络搜索。这种设置允许 AI 模型以安全和受控的方式获取实时的网络信息。

官方
精选