provekit-mcp

provekit-mcp

Provides AI agents with a hardened code security scanner via scan_code and scan_path, detecting leaked secrets and insecure patterns while enforcing strict path confinement and resource bounds.

Category
访问服务器

README

provekit-mcp

A hardened MCP server that gives an AI agent a code security scanner, built so the tools themselves cannot be turned against the host. It ships with its own red-team suite that spawns the real server and attacks it over the protocol, and proves every trust boundary holds.

An MCP tool is a function a model can call with arguments it chose, sometimes while reading untrusted content. So the interesting question about an MCP server is not "what can it do" but "what happens when someone points it at ../../../../etc/passwd." This one is built to answer that question out loud.

python -m provekit_mcp.server        # run the server (stdio)
python -m redteam.run                # attack it and print the verdict
pytest -q                            # 97 tests, incl. the live red-team

Two tools, both built for a hostile caller

Tool What it does Why it's safe
scan_code(code, filename) Scans a snippet the agent already has in hand for leaked secrets and insecure patterns (OWASP Top 10). No filesystem access at all, so there is no path to traverse. filename is reduced to a bare label and never read. Input size is bounded.
scan_path(path) Scans a source file, but only inside a configured workspace root. Every path goes through guard.safe_resolve first: absolute paths, .. traversal, null bytes, and symlink escapes are all refused before a single byte is read.

scan_code run on AI-generated Python: leaked Stripe key, os.system command injection, pickle deserialization, requests verify=False, MD5, each mapped to OWASP

The threat model (this is the point)

An MCP server hands an autonomous model a set of tools. The model may be acting on content it just fetched from the web, an issue comment, a file it read, any of which can carry an instruction the model wasn't supposed to follow. So the server has to assume every argument is attacker-controlled. The trust boundaries provekit-mcp defends:

  1. Path confinement. A file tool must never read outside the workspace it was given. The classic breakouts, ../ traversal, an absolute /etc/passwd, a null byte to truncate an extension check, and a symlink inside the root pointing out of it, are each closed and each has a test.
  2. Resource bounds. A single tool call must not be a way to exhaust host memory or CPU. Per-call input is capped; oversized calls are refused in milliseconds, not after allocating.
  3. No catastrophic backtracking. The scanner's rules are all bounded regexes. A 40,000-character pathological line scans in single-digit milliseconds, so a crafted argument can't hang the server (ReDoS).
  4. Arguments are inert data. A malicious string passed as code is scanned as text, never executed. The scanner reads it, flags the eval / os.system in it, and moves on.
  5. Refusals don't leak. A rejected call returns a structured { "ok": false, "code": "escape", ... }, never a stack trace, never a partial read.

Defense in depth: guard.safe_resolve is the primary path control, and the MCP SDK's own ResourceSecurity(reject_path_traversal, reject_absolute_paths, reject_null_bytes) is enabled as an independent second layer. Neither is trusted to be the only thing standing between a tool call and the filesystem.

The red-team suite

python -m redteam.run doesn't test the functions in-process, it spawns the actual server as a subprocess and speaks MCP to it (initialize → tools/list → tools/call), firing each attack the way a hostile client would. Every response is triaged into one of five honest outcomes:

  • HELD — an attack was correctly refused
  • BREACH — an attack succeeded (critical)
  • OK — a legitimate call worked
  • REGRESSION — a legitimate call was wrongly refused (over-blocking is a real failure; a scanner nobody can use is worthless)
  • INCONCLUSIVE — no usable answer

That last outcome is the discipline that matters. A cold start, a hang, or a garbled frame is never scored as "secure." The run is only clean when there are zero breaches, zero regressions, and zero inconclusive results, every control actually verified, not assumed.

red-team report: 9 attacks held, 0 breaches, 3 controls OK, 0 regressions, 0 inconclusive, verdict all controls held and verified

attacks held: 9   breaches: 0   controls OK: 3   regressions: 0   inconclusive: 0
VERDICT: ALL CONTROLS HELD AND VERIFIED

Attacks currently in the suite: path traversal, deep traversal, absolute path, symlink escape, null-byte truncation, binary-file read, 6 MB resource exhaustion, a ReDoS pathological line, and an argument-as-code injection, plus two control calls that prove the guards don't over-block. The machine-readable result is written to assets/redteam-report.json.

What the scanner catches

The engine is a Python port of provekit, kept rule-for-rule compatible on the shared detectors and extended with Python-specific vulnerabilities (since that's where the work is).

OWASP Examples
A07 / A02 — Leaked secrets AWS / GitHub / Stripe / OpenAI / Anthropic keys, private-key blocks, DB URLs with inline credentials, hard-coded passwords
A03 — Injection eval / new Function, os.system built from an f-string, shell commands via interpolation, subprocess(..., shell=True), SQL by concatenation, innerHTML
A08 — Insecure deserialization pickle.loads, yaml.load without SafeLoader
A02 — Broken crypto / transport requests(..., verify=False), rejectUnauthorized: false, MD5/SHA1 for passwords, Math.random()/random for tokens
A10 — SSRF user-controlled input reaching a server-side HTTP request
A05 — Misconfiguration wildcard CORS, debug=True

It is built to be precise, because a scanner that cries wolf is a scanner you switch off. It skips parameterized SQL, env-var reads, bcrypt/argon hashes, yaml.safe_load, and placeholder values; it stays quiet in test/ and fixture files on the insecure things test code does on purpose, while still catching a real key anywhere. And it never silently skips a long line, a secret hidden behind a wall of padding is still caught, and a line genuinely too long to scan safely is reported (line-too-long), never dropped.

Install and wire it into Claude

git clone https://github.com/Th3Circle-app/provekit-mcp && cd provekit-mcp
python -m venv .venv && source .venv/bin/activate
pip install .          # installs the `provekit-mcp` entrypoint

For development, you can also run it straight from the repo without installing:

pip install mcp>=2.0
python -m provekit_mcp.server        # run from the repo root
pytest -q                            # 97 tests, incl. the live red-team

Add it to Claude Desktop / Claude Code (claude_desktop_config.json), pointing the workspace root at the repo you want scannable, see claude_desktop_config.example.json:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "provekit": {
      "command": "python",
      "args": ["-m", "provekit_mcp.server"],
      "env": { "PROVEKIT_MCP_ROOT": "/absolute/path/to/your/repo" }
    }
  }
}

Now your agent can call scan_code before it ships a snippet, or scan_path to check a file, and the server guarantees it can only ever read inside that one root.

Layout

provekit_mcp/
  scanner.py   # the detection engine: bounded rules, no silent skips, ReDoS-safe
  guard.py     # the trust-boundary guards: safe_resolve, size + binary limits
  server.py    # the MCP server; tool logic lives in plain functions the tests call
redteam/
  engine.py    # HELD / BREACH / OK / REGRESSION / INCONCLUSIVE triage
  run.py       # spawns the real server over stdio and attacks it
tests/         # 97 tests: scanner correctness, the guards, the tools, the live red-team

Design notes worth reading the code for

  • The tool logic is not inside the @app.tool decorators. do_scan_code / do_scan_path are plain module functions; the MCP wrappers are three lines each. This means the tests and the red-team exercise exactly what ships over the wire, not a parallel copy.
  • safe_resolve uses realpath + a trailing-separator containment check. realpath collapses .. and follows symlinks, so a link out of the tree resolves to its true location and fails containment. The trailing os.sep on the prefix check prevents the /a/b vs /a/bc false pass.
  • Inconclusive ≠ secure. Carried over from redteam-loop: the earlier version once scored a cold-start HTTP None as a pass. It doesn't anymore, here or there.

Who's behind it

Built by Harrison C. Songolo. Companion projects: provekit (the scanner as a zero-dep CLI + CI gate), redteam-loop (attack → propose fix → re-fire the exact exploit to prove it's closed), and security-assessments (SSRFs found, fixed, and disclosed in open-source tools).

MIT.

推荐服务器

Baidu Map

Baidu Map

百度地图核心API现已全面兼容MCP协议,是国内首家兼容MCP协议的地图服务商。

官方
精选
JavaScript
Playwright MCP Server

Playwright MCP Server

一个模型上下文协议服务器,它使大型语言模型能够通过结构化的可访问性快照与网页进行交互,而无需视觉模型或屏幕截图。

官方
精选
TypeScript
Magic Component Platform (MCP)

Magic Component Platform (MCP)

一个由人工智能驱动的工具,可以从自然语言描述生成现代化的用户界面组件,并与流行的集成开发环境(IDE)集成,从而简化用户界面开发流程。

官方
精选
本地
TypeScript
Audiense Insights MCP Server

Audiense Insights MCP Server

通过模型上下文协议启用与 Audiense Insights 账户的交互,从而促进营销洞察和受众数据的提取和分析,包括人口统计信息、行为和影响者互动。

官方
精选
本地
TypeScript
VeyraX

VeyraX

一个单一的 MCP 工具,连接你所有喜爱的工具:Gmail、日历以及其他 40 多个工具。

官方
精选
本地
graphlit-mcp-server

graphlit-mcp-server

模型上下文协议 (MCP) 服务器实现了 MCP 客户端与 Graphlit 服务之间的集成。 除了网络爬取之外,还可以将任何内容(从 Slack 到 Gmail 再到播客订阅源)导入到 Graphlit 项目中,然后从 MCP 客户端检索相关内容。

官方
精选
TypeScript
Kagi MCP Server

Kagi MCP Server

一个 MCP 服务器,集成了 Kagi 搜索功能和 Claude AI,使 Claude 能够在回答需要最新信息的问题时执行实时网络搜索。

官方
精选
Python
e2b-mcp-server

e2b-mcp-server

使用 MCP 通过 e2b 运行代码。

官方
精选
Neon MCP Server

Neon MCP Server

用于与 Neon 管理 API 和数据库交互的 MCP 服务器

官方
精选
Exa MCP Server

Exa MCP Server

模型上下文协议(MCP)服务器允许像 Claude 这样的 AI 助手使用 Exa AI 搜索 API 进行网络搜索。这种设置允许 AI 模型以安全和受控的方式获取实时的网络信息。

官方
精选