reelier

reelier

Record an agent's MCP tool-call workflow once, replay it deterministically for zero tokens, and get a receipt — a snapshot-testing and deterministic-execution layer for Agent Skills.

Category
访问服务器

README

<div align="center">

<img src="https://www.reelier.com/avatar.svg" width="72" alt="Reelier" />

Reelier

Agents make claims. Reelier writes receipts.

A dependency bump shouldn't silently break your agent. Reelier re-runs your recorded workflows against the new version at zero LLM cost and diffs them — so you see exactly what changed before you merge.

Think of it as CI + snapshot tests for your agent's tool-call workflows.

npm version CI tests license Discord stars

Website · Docs · SPEC.md

<img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/seldonframe/reelier/main/docs/assets/reelier-demo.gif" width="760" alt="Reelier: Dependabot bumps a dependency, Reelier replays your recorded agent run at 0 tokens and diffs it, catching the drift on the PR before you merge" />

<sub><a href="https://www.reelier.com/reelier-explainer.mp4">▶ watch with sound (27s)</a></sub>

<a href="https://glama.ai/mcp/servers/seldonframe/reelier"><img width="380" height="200" src="https://glama.ai/mcp/servers/seldonframe/reelier/badge" alt="Reelier MCP server on Glama" /></a>

</div>


Why

AI agents are non-deterministic — the same prompt, a different result every run — and they'll claim they did the work whether they did or not. Reelier records the run that worked, replays it deterministically at $0, and writes a signed receipt that proves it. Point it at your existing CI in one workflow — it adds a verifiable receipt, it doesn't replace your stack.

Measured on a real head-to-head benchmark, same task, same data (full method):

  • 1,000 / 1,000 replays byte-identical
  • ~50× cheaper
  • ~59× faster

Install

npm i -g reelier && reelier init
# No Node install needed — same commands via Docker:
docker run --rm ghcr.io/seldonframe/reelier --help

reelier init scans work you've already done (Claude Code, Codex, OpenClaw) into a real skill, or falls back to a zero-setup demo with a real receipt in under 60 seconds.

How to use it

reelier init                        # 60s: record → compile → replay → your receipt
reelier run  <name>.skill.md        # replay deterministically — 0 tokens (read-only by default)
reelier diff <name>                 # SAME or DRIFTED, per step — exit 1 on drift
reelier push <name>.skill.md        # sync receipts to your ledger (opt-in)
reelier ci                          # write a workflow: drift-CI + PR receipts, one command
  1. Record. reelier mcp --wrap "<mcp server>" proxies your tools live, or pull a session via reelier scan/from-session, or run the guided reelier init.
  2. Compile. reelier compile turns a trace into a SKILL.md — 0 LLM calls, minimal assertions, honest gaps printed as Open questions.
  3. Replay. reelier run replays it at Level 0 — no LLM, byte-identical, read-only by default (writes need --allow-writes).
  4. Diff. reelier diff reports SAME or DRIFTED per step, with the failing assertion as the why — exit 1 on drift.
  5. Log in. reelier login connects this machine to Reelier Cloud with a device code in your browser — or set REELIER_CLOUD_URL/REELIER_CLOUD_KEY for CI and self-hosting.
  6. Push. Every run is a receipt; reelier push optionally syncs it to a ledger for a permalink and an embeddable verified-replay badge.

Already have an Agent Skill? Convert it — your skill, minus the model:

reelier compile trace.jsonl --from-skill ./my-skill/SKILL.md

Three tests, one skill

Test Command Answers
Determinism reelier run <skill.md> Does this still do what it did?
Recovery reelier run <skill.md> --fail N If this broke, would the skill notice and heal?
Drift reelier run <skill.md> --wrap "<your mcp server>" Has the world moved out from under this skill?

Taxonomy due to Mads Hansen's review of the launch post. Full semantics for each test, including recovery injection and manifest guardrails: docs/REFERENCE.md.

Gate Dependabot / Renovate bump PRs

Dependabot and Renovate open the PR and run your test suite — but neither knows what your agent actually does at runtime, so a dependency bump that silently changes a tool call's shape (a renamed field, a new default, a different error) sails through with green unit tests. This is the check they don't run.

Copy .github/workflows/reelier-bump-check.yml into your repo, point skill: at your own recorded .skill.md file(s), and it will: gate to PRs from dependabot[bot]/renovate[bot] (or a dependencies label), install the bumped dependency, replay your recorded skill live against it at --max-level 0 (0 tokens), and fail the check on the exact step that drifted.

This tests dependency and MCP-tool-call behavior — it does not test model upgrades; --max-level 0 never calls an LLM. Full listing copy and setup: docs/marketplace-listing.md.

Prove it

A pushed receipt carries a ladder of independently-verifiable claims — not one blanket "verified." Depending on what you turn on, it can be signed, timestamped, CI-attested, and carry cross-checkable provider request-ids. reelier verify recomputes every claim offline, and a claim you haven't enabled just renders as an honest gap, never a shamed one.

See a real one: reelier.com/r/HWBdmGob9KeHRqXi-OEaRD0z.

Full 8-rung ladder, what each rung does and doesn't prove: docs/REFERENCE.md.

Who it's for

  • Solo dev / OSS maintainer — a real regression test again; drift can't pass silently.
  • Team shipping agent changes — "it ran clean" becomes a checkable PR artifact, not a claim.
  • Agency running agents for clients — signed, timestamped proof-of-delivery a client can verify.
  • Marketplace buyer or seller — corroborated receipts are reviews that can't be astroturfed.
  • Audit-facing ops — a signed, CI-attested trail of every write, idempotency key included.

MIT, free forever (versions ≤0.16.0 remain AGPL-3.0). Your data — skills, traces, runs — is specified in SPEC.md, so leaving is copying a folder.

Contributing: issues and PRs welcome — SPEC.md is the source of truth for formats; fix the code, not the spec. npm test before a PR.

<div align="center">

If Reelier saved you a re-run, star it ⭐ — it's how other builders find it.

</div>

推荐服务器

Baidu Map

Baidu Map

百度地图核心API现已全面兼容MCP协议,是国内首家兼容MCP协议的地图服务商。

官方
精选
JavaScript
Playwright MCP Server

Playwright MCP Server

一个模型上下文协议服务器,它使大型语言模型能够通过结构化的可访问性快照与网页进行交互,而无需视觉模型或屏幕截图。

官方
精选
TypeScript
Magic Component Platform (MCP)

Magic Component Platform (MCP)

一个由人工智能驱动的工具,可以从自然语言描述生成现代化的用户界面组件,并与流行的集成开发环境(IDE)集成,从而简化用户界面开发流程。

官方
精选
本地
TypeScript
Audiense Insights MCP Server

Audiense Insights MCP Server

通过模型上下文协议启用与 Audiense Insights 账户的交互,从而促进营销洞察和受众数据的提取和分析,包括人口统计信息、行为和影响者互动。

官方
精选
本地
TypeScript
VeyraX

VeyraX

一个单一的 MCP 工具,连接你所有喜爱的工具:Gmail、日历以及其他 40 多个工具。

官方
精选
本地
graphlit-mcp-server

graphlit-mcp-server

模型上下文协议 (MCP) 服务器实现了 MCP 客户端与 Graphlit 服务之间的集成。 除了网络爬取之外,还可以将任何内容(从 Slack 到 Gmail 再到播客订阅源)导入到 Graphlit 项目中,然后从 MCP 客户端检索相关内容。

官方
精选
TypeScript
Kagi MCP Server

Kagi MCP Server

一个 MCP 服务器,集成了 Kagi 搜索功能和 Claude AI,使 Claude 能够在回答需要最新信息的问题时执行实时网络搜索。

官方
精选
Python
e2b-mcp-server

e2b-mcp-server

使用 MCP 通过 e2b 运行代码。

官方
精选
Neon MCP Server

Neon MCP Server

用于与 Neon 管理 API 和数据库交互的 MCP 服务器

官方
精选
Exa MCP Server

Exa MCP Server

模型上下文协议(MCP)服务器允许像 Claude 这样的 AI 助手使用 Exa AI 搜索 API 进行网络搜索。这种设置允许 AI 模型以安全和受控的方式获取实时的网络信息。

官方
精选