retail-ops-mcp-kit
Provides four MCP servers for retail/CPG operations (ERP, supplier network, email, spreadsheet) with a staged-write safety model that requires human approval for all mutations.
README
retail-ops-mcp-kit
Four small Python MCP servers — one per enterprise-system class a retail/CPG operations
agent integrates (ERP / supplier network / email / spreadsheet). Each server models a
real named SaaS on the wire (SAP S/4HANA, SPS Commerce, Microsoft Graph, Google Sheets, …),
selectable by env, over one shared synthetic corpus. Every mutation is a staged
write: it validates, records a pending_approval record, returns an approval_id, and
never executes. A separate approve(approval_id, token) needs a human token that lives
only in the server environment and that the agent cannot read — so auto-execution is
impossible by construction. Humans stay in control of what runs versus what waits, designed
into the connector layer.
- 4 servers, one runtime dependency (
mcp>=1.27.2); everything else is stdlib. - FastMCP + hatchling src-layout + uv, Python 3.12, docstring-per-tool.
- All data is fully synthetic and methodology-only — see
PROVENANCE.md.
"I know your stack" — tool → real SaaS endpoint
Each server's tool signature is identical across every dialect it models; only the wire envelope changes (the connector seam). A host cannot tell which system answered.
retail-erp-mcp — the three-way match (PO / goods-receipt / invoice)
| MCP tool | Kind | SAP S/4HANA (default) | Oracle NetSuite | MS Dynamics 365 F&O |
|---|---|---|---|---|
get_purchase_order |
read | GET …/API_PURCHASEORDER_PROCESS_SRV/A_PurchaseOrder('…')?$expand=to_PurchaseOrderItem → {"d":{…}} |
GET /services/rest/record/v1/purchaseOrder/{id} → {id,tranId,entity,item:{items[]}} |
GET /data/PurchaseOrderHeadersV2(dataAreaId='usmf',PurchaseOrderNumber='…') → {@odata.etag,…} |
get_goods_receipt |
read | GET …/API_MATERIAL_DOCUMENT_SRV/A_MaterialDocumentHeader (GM type 101) |
GET …/record/v1/itemReceipt/{id} |
GET /data/ProductReceiptHeaders |
get_invoice |
read | GET …/API_SUPPLIERINVOICE_PROCESS_SRV/A_SupplierInvoice('…') |
GET …/record/v1/vendorBill/{id} |
GET /data/VendorInvoiceHeaders |
list_open_pos |
read | GET …/A_PurchaseOrder?$filter=… → {"d":{"results":[]}} |
GET …/record/v1/purchaseOrder?q=status:open → {items,hasMore,offset} |
GET /data/PurchaseOrderHeadersV2?$filter=PurchaseOrderStatus eq 'Backorder' |
stage_invoice_payment |
staged-write | POST …/API_JOURNALENTRYITEMBASIC_SRV/A_JournalEntryItemBasic (x-csrf-token) |
POST …/record/v1/vendorPayment |
POST /data/VendorPaymentJournalHeaders |
stage_po_amendment |
staged-write | PATCH …/A_PurchaseOrder('…') (If-Match / x-csrf) |
PATCH …/record/v1/purchaseOrder/{id} |
PATCH /data/PurchaseOrderHeadersV2(…) (If-Match etag) |
simulate_po_event |
webhook seam | Advanced Event Mesh CloudEvent sap/s4/beh/purchaseorder/v1/…/Created/v1 |
SuiteScript user-event https.post callback |
Business Events → Azure Event Grid |
Auth handshakes modeled per dialect (documented, never performed): SAP x-csrf-token: Fetch
round-trip + sap-client; NetSuite OAuth1.0a account-ID host; D365 @odata.etag + If-Match.
retail-supplier-mcp — supplier network (ASNs / exceptions / deductions)
| MCP tool | Kind | SPS Commerce (default) | Coupa | SAP Ariba |
|---|---|---|---|---|
get_asn |
read | EDI-856 Universal-JSON: hierarchicalLevels[] (S→O→T→I), carrier.scac, sscc18 |
REST ASN document | cXML ShipNoticeRequest |
get_shipment_status |
read | 214-style status {shipmentIdentification, carrier, trackingNumber, status} |
ASN status document | cXML StatusUpdateRequest |
get_supplier |
read | trading-partner {tradingPartnerId, senderId, …} (derived) |
supplier record (derived) | supplier + NetworkID (derived) |
list_exceptions |
read | exception-queue rows [{id, po_id, evidence_text}] (gold_* withheld) |
— same abstraction — | — same abstraction — |
stage_credit_note |
staged-write | EDI 810-variant | Coupa document-type:"credit_note" |
InvoiceDetailRequest purpose="creditMemo" |
stage_debit_note |
staged-write | SPS debit doc | Coupa negative invoice | InvoiceDetailRequest purpose="debitMemo" |
acknowledge_exception |
staged-write | EDI 855 PO-ack (itemStatusCode IA/IB/IR) + 997 functional ack |
POST /documents/{id}/acknowledge |
cXML confirmation |
simulate_inbound_asn |
webhook seam | {eventType:"document.received", transactionType:"856", …} + the 856 payload |
{event:"purchase_order.updated", …} |
cXML StatusUpdateRequest |
Ack/event vocabulary modeled: 850 (inbound PO), 856 (ASN), 810 (invoice), 855 (PO ack),
997 (functional ack); Coupa X-COUPA-API-KEY + scoped OAuth (core.invoice.write); Ariba
dual apikey + OAuth and cXML <Credential domain="NetworkID">.
retail-email-mcp — supplier chase (mailbox threads + staged send)
| MCP tool | Kind | Microsoft Graph (default) | Gmail API |
|---|---|---|---|
list_chase_thread |
read | GET /me/messages?$filter=conversationId eq '…' → {"value":[…]} |
GET /users/me/threads/{id} |
get_supplier_reply |
read | GET /me/messages/{id} |
messages.get?format=full (base64url payload) |
stage_chase_email |
staged-write | POST /me/sendMail (202, no body) |
messages.send {raw, threadId} |
stage_escalation_email |
staged-write | POST /me/sendMail with ccRecipients |
messages.send {raw, threadId} |
simulate_change_notification |
webhook seam | Graph change-notification + validationToken echo |
Pub/Sub {message:{data:<base64>}} + historyId cursor |
The chase ladder tone (soft → firm → escalation) is recomputed from prior_chases
against policy.chase_ladder — never read from a stored "next step".
retail-sheets-mcp — reconciliation worksheet
| MCP tool | Kind | Google Sheets (default) | MS Graph Excel |
|---|---|---|---|
read_reconciliation_sheet |
read | GET /v4/spreadsheets/{id}/values/Reconciliation!A1:I11 → {range,majorDimension,values} |
#microsoft.graph.workbookRange (values/text/numberFormat/valueTypes, JSON-number cells) |
get_range |
read | GET …/values/{range} over Reconciliation / Approvals / Audit |
…/worksheets('…')/range(address='…') |
stage_cell_update |
staged-write | PUT …/values/{range}?valueInputOption=USER_ENTERED |
PATCH …/range(address='…') |
stage_row_append |
staged-write | values:append |
…/tables/{name}/rows/add {values:[[…]]} |
simulate_change_notification |
webhook seam | Drive files.watch push channel (Sheets values have no native webhook) |
driveItem change-notification (+ 409/423 stale workbook-session) |
Reconciliation is a PO+receipt+invoice+ASN join; Approvals (from approval_actions,
with a recomputed Gated column) and Audit (from audit_entries, with a recomputed
Complete column over policy.audit_required_fields) are also readable.
The safety model — humans control what runs vs. what waits
- Every mutation is a staged write. A mutation tool validates its payload against the
corpus, calls
staging.stage(...), and returns{result:"pending_approval", approval_id, target_endpoint, payload, validation, status:"pending"}. Nothing executes at stage time. approve(approval_id, token)is the only path to execution, and it requires the human approval token from the server environment (RETAIL_OPS_MCP_APPROVAL_TOKEN). The suppliedtokenis compared withhmac.compare_digest. That token is never a tool return, never in the corpus, never a default — the agent has no channel to read it, so any token it fabricates fails. Absent a configured token, approval fails closed (refused).- Auto-execution is impossible by construction. Staging never executes;
approveneeds a secret the agent structurally cannot hold. This is the deliberate inverse of "no creds in argv": here the argv token is the human's proof-of-presence, intentionally withheld from the agent. - Execution is fabrication, not persistence. On a valid human approval, the stored
execute(payload)returns a synthetic SaaS response envelope (a SAP journal-entry doc number, a Graph202, a SheetsupdatedCells) recorded on the in-process ledger — it never appends to a JSONL or edits the corpus. - A fingerprint invariant makes it testable.
corpus.fingerprint()(sha256 over all fixture bytes) is byte-identical before staging, after staging, and after a full approve+execute.smoke_test.pyasserts exactly this.
Shared on every server: approve, list_pending_approvals, get_approval_status, and an
active_system() tell.
System selection
Each server picks the modeled SaaS dialect from an env var (validated allowlist, safe local default, no credentials):
| Server | Env var | Allowlist | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
retail-erp-mcp |
RETAIL_ERP_SYSTEM |
sap_s4hana, netsuite, dynamics365 |
sap_s4hana |
retail-supplier-mcp |
RETAIL_SUPPLIER_SYSTEM |
sps_commerce, coupa, ariba |
sps_commerce |
retail-email-mcp |
RETAIL_EMAIL_SYSTEM |
msgraph, gmail |
msgraph |
retail-sheets-mcp |
RETAIL_SHEETS_SYSTEM |
google_sheets, msgraph_excel |
google_sheets |
active_system() reports the wired dialect without leaking any credential.
Data posture
All 11 fixtures are fully synthetic, methodology-only, and vendored verbatim from the
agentic-eval-harness retail_ops set — see PROVENANCE.md. policy.json
numbers are <<TOKEN>>-tagged invented placeholders; exception rows carry only abstract
MARKER_* tokens in benign filler. The suppliers() resource is the one kit-authored
derivation (synthesized from the supplier FK, flagged _derived). No network call is ever
made; there is no runtime path back to the harness.
Develop
just setup # uv sync --extra dev
just check # lint + typecheck + test + smoke (the gate)
just smoke # dependency-light staged-write proof → prints SMOKE OK
just run-erp # run a server on stdio (RETAIL_ERP_SYSTEM overridable)
Wire into an MCP host
Claude Desktop (claude_desktop_config.json) or a project .mcp.json:
{
"mcpServers": {
"retail-erp": { "command": "uv", "args": ["run", "retail-erp-mcp"],
"env": { "RETAIL_ERP_SYSTEM": "sap_s4hana",
"RETAIL_OPS_MCP_APPROVAL_TOKEN": "<operator-injected; NOT known to the agent>" } },
"retail-supplier": { "command": "uv", "args": ["run", "retail-supplier-mcp"],
"env": { "RETAIL_SUPPLIER_SYSTEM": "sps_commerce",
"RETAIL_OPS_MCP_APPROVAL_TOKEN": "<operator-injected>" } },
"retail-email": { "command": "uv", "args": ["run", "retail-email-mcp"],
"env": { "RETAIL_EMAIL_SYSTEM": "msgraph",
"RETAIL_OPS_MCP_APPROVAL_TOKEN": "<operator-injected>" } },
"retail-sheets": { "command": "uv", "args": ["run", "retail-sheets-mcp"],
"env": { "RETAIL_SHEETS_SYSTEM": "google_sheets",
"RETAIL_OPS_MCP_APPROVAL_TOKEN": "<operator-injected>" } }
}
}
The approval token belongs in the host/operator's env injection (or a secrets manager), and is deliberately withheld from the agent — that withholding is the entire control. Without it configured, all approvals fail closed.
License
Dual-licensed under Apache-2.0 OR MIT (added at T1). All data synthetic — see PROVENANCE.md.
推荐服务器
Baidu Map
百度地图核心API现已全面兼容MCP协议,是国内首家兼容MCP协议的地图服务商。
Playwright MCP Server
一个模型上下文协议服务器,它使大型语言模型能够通过结构化的可访问性快照与网页进行交互,而无需视觉模型或屏幕截图。
Magic Component Platform (MCP)
一个由人工智能驱动的工具,可以从自然语言描述生成现代化的用户界面组件,并与流行的集成开发环境(IDE)集成,从而简化用户界面开发流程。
Audiense Insights MCP Server
通过模型上下文协议启用与 Audiense Insights 账户的交互,从而促进营销洞察和受众数据的提取和分析,包括人口统计信息、行为和影响者互动。
VeyraX
一个单一的 MCP 工具,连接你所有喜爱的工具:Gmail、日历以及其他 40 多个工具。
graphlit-mcp-server
模型上下文协议 (MCP) 服务器实现了 MCP 客户端与 Graphlit 服务之间的集成。 除了网络爬取之外,还可以将任何内容(从 Slack 到 Gmail 再到播客订阅源)导入到 Graphlit 项目中,然后从 MCP 客户端检索相关内容。
Kagi MCP Server
一个 MCP 服务器,集成了 Kagi 搜索功能和 Claude AI,使 Claude 能够在回答需要最新信息的问题时执行实时网络搜索。
e2b-mcp-server
使用 MCP 通过 e2b 运行代码。
Neon MCP Server
用于与 Neon 管理 API 和数据库交互的 MCP 服务器
Exa MCP Server
模型上下文协议(MCP)服务器允许像 Claude 这样的 AI 助手使用 Exa AI 搜索 API 进行网络搜索。这种设置允许 AI 模型以安全和受控的方式获取实时的网络信息。