sdcgovernance
MCP server for SDC governance validation, exposing tools that agents call to validate governance content in XML instances against SDC data models and return XACML decisions (PERMIT, DENY, INDETERMINATE).
README
sdcgovernance
<!-- mcp-name: io.github.SemanticDataCharter/sdcgovernance -->
W3C standards-based governance advisory engine for Semantic Data Charter instances.
A Python library that validates governance content in XML data instances against governance components defined in the SDC data model. If the model defines governance (workflow, attestation, party/role, provenance, audit), the instance must carry that content - and this library validates it.
Returns decisions using OASIS XACML semantics: PERMIT, DENY, or INDETERMINATE.
No framework dependency. No middleware. A function call.
How It Works
SDC data models (XSD) can optionally include governance components: Workflow state machines, Attestation authority requirements, Party/Role constraints, Provenance requirements, and Audit definitions. These are part of the data model, not a separate governance layer.
When governance components are defined, every XML data instance must carry the corresponding governance content. This library validates that content against the model:
from sdcgovernance import validate_governance
result = validate_governance("model.xsd", "instance.xml")
print(result.decision) # PERMIT, DENY, or INDETERMINATE
print(result.has_governance) # True if model defines governance components
print(result.errors) # list of governance validation errors
print(result.receipt) # tamper-evident decision receipt
If the model does not define governance components, the result is PERMIT - no governance to enforce.
Two Independent Libraries
sdcvalidator and sdcgovernance are separate, independent libraries. There is no hook, no chaining, no automatic invocation of one from the other.
sdcvalidator (structural validation)
Does the instance conform to the XSD schema?
Single-pass. Instance in, pass/fail out.
sdcgovernance (governance advisory)
Does the model define governance components?
If yes: does the instance carry valid governance content?
Conversational. Agents query multiple times during a workflow.
Both libraries read the schema from the instance. Agents call each one independently, at different points in a workflow, in whatever order the operational logic requires. A single workflow may involve multiple calls to both libraries.
What Gets Validated
| Component | What the model defines | What the instance must carry |
|---|---|---|
| Workflow | Cluster tree of valid paths (sub-clusters with XdOrdinal states) | Current XdOrdinal state, proposed transition validated against ordinal adjacency in valid paths |
| Attestation | Authority requirements per action | Attestation with correct role, party reference, timestamp |
| Party/Role | Role constraints for governed actions | Acting party identification with required role |
| Provenance/Audit | Provenance requirements (PROV-O) + retention policy (DPV) | PROV-formatted record(s) per retention policy: most recent + hash, last N, or full chain |
Governance components are discovered by their position in the DMType root (fixed RM slots: workflow, attestation, party/role, audit, and related), not by CUID2 identity. Once a slot is found, its content is validated by vocabulary binding against the relevant standard (PROV-O, SCXML, VC, DPV). Any component occupying the right slot and bound to the right vocabulary is recognized - whether it comes from the Default project or was custom-built.
Enforcement Decisions (OASIS XACML)
| Decision | Meaning |
|---|---|
| PERMIT | All governance checks pass - action is authorized |
| DENY | One or more governance checks fail - action is refused |
| INDETERMINATE | Governance checks partially pass - requires review (configurable) |
Every decision produces a W3C PROV record and a SHA-256 hash-chained receipt.
What happens after the decision is the agent's responsibility. sdcgovernance issues the decision and the receipt. The operational response - routing, escalation, notification, halting - is customer business logic that varies per implementation.
Two Interfaces, One Engine
Python API - for direct integration:
from sdcgovernance import validate_governance
result = validate_governance("model.xsd", "instance.xml")
MCP Server - for any agent framework:
sdcgovernance serve --mcp
The MCP server exposes governance as tools that agents call. The agent runs the loop. sdcgovernance advises.
Standards
- OASIS XACML - decision semantics (PERMIT/DENY/INDETERMINATE)
- SDC native structure + W3C SCXML concepts - workflow sequencing via XdOrdinal components in sub-cluster paths, borrowing the concepts of state and transition from automata theory as specified in W3C SCXML
- W3C PROV (PROV-O, PROV-DM) - provenance/audit records (one governance dimension)
- W3C Data Privacy Vocabulary (DPV) - provenance retention policy (same vocabulary used for SDC access control)
- W3C Activity Streams 2.0 - activity/event type vocabulary
- W3C Verifiable Credentials Data Model 2.0 - attestation authority pattern
- W3C SHACL - cross-entity constraint validation
- OMG DMN - decision tables for complex governance rules
- SHA-256 - tamper-evident hash chains for decision receipts
Architecture
src/sdcgovernance/
├── __init__.py # Public API: validate_governance()
├── engine.py # GovernanceEngine - the decision engine agents query
├── model_inspector.py # Inspect SDC model for governance components
├── workflow.py # Validate workflow transitions in instance
├── attestation.py # Validate attestation content in instance
├── party_role.py # Validate party/role constraints in instance
├── provenance.py # Validate provenance/audit records + PROV generation + DPV retention policy
├── decision.py # DMN decision table evaluation
├── receipts.py # Decision receipt chain (hash-chained)
├── shacl_runtime.py # SHACL cross-entity constraint validation
└── mcp_server.py # MCP server exposing governance tools to any agent
Pure Python. No Django. No middleware. No web framework dependency.
Installation
pip install sdcgovernance
Integration with SDC Ecosystem
- sdcvalidator - independent structural validation library. Agents call it separately from sdcgovernance, at different points in a workflow.
- SDCStudio - models governance components visually. The XSD output includes governance definitions that sdcgovernance validates against.
- AppGen - generated applications can call
validate_governance()at data entry boundaries. - SDC Agents - reference implementations showing how to wire governance MCP tools into agentic workflows using Default project governance models. Customer agents connect to the same MCP server and use the tools however they want.
Status
Production-ready. Available on PyPI under Apache 2.0.
Dependencies
rdflib- RDF/PROV record generationpyshacl- SHACL constraint validation
License
Apache 2.0
推荐服务器
Baidu Map
百度地图核心API现已全面兼容MCP协议,是国内首家兼容MCP协议的地图服务商。
Playwright MCP Server
一个模型上下文协议服务器,它使大型语言模型能够通过结构化的可访问性快照与网页进行交互,而无需视觉模型或屏幕截图。
Magic Component Platform (MCP)
一个由人工智能驱动的工具,可以从自然语言描述生成现代化的用户界面组件,并与流行的集成开发环境(IDE)集成,从而简化用户界面开发流程。
Audiense Insights MCP Server
通过模型上下文协议启用与 Audiense Insights 账户的交互,从而促进营销洞察和受众数据的提取和分析,包括人口统计信息、行为和影响者互动。
VeyraX
一个单一的 MCP 工具,连接你所有喜爱的工具:Gmail、日历以及其他 40 多个工具。
graphlit-mcp-server
模型上下文协议 (MCP) 服务器实现了 MCP 客户端与 Graphlit 服务之间的集成。 除了网络爬取之外,还可以将任何内容(从 Slack 到 Gmail 再到播客订阅源)导入到 Graphlit 项目中,然后从 MCP 客户端检索相关内容。
Kagi MCP Server
一个 MCP 服务器,集成了 Kagi 搜索功能和 Claude AI,使 Claude 能够在回答需要最新信息的问题时执行实时网络搜索。
e2b-mcp-server
使用 MCP 通过 e2b 运行代码。
Neon MCP Server
用于与 Neon 管理 API 和数据库交互的 MCP 服务器
Exa MCP Server
模型上下文协议(MCP)服务器允许像 Claude 这样的 AI 助手使用 Exa AI 搜索 API 进行网络搜索。这种设置允许 AI 模型以安全和受控的方式获取实时的网络信息。