SecureMCP-Agentic
Provides a set of tools with a security verification layer that assesses risk and requires human approval for high-risk actions, reducing prompt injection and tool-poisoning attacks.
README
SecureMCP-Agentic
SecureMCP-Agentic is a research prototype for secure tool selection in LLM-based agents. It adds a security-aware verification layer between top-k tool retrieval and tool execution to reduce prompt injection and tool-poisoning attacks in MCP-enabled agent systems.
Current Status
The current implementation is a working heuristic baseline. It includes:
- Local MCP server with benign, high-risk, and simulated malicious tools
- ChromaDB-based top-k tool retrieval
- Prompt-injection phrase detection
- Intent-mismatch approximation
- Permission-risk scoring
- Execution-impact scoring
- MCP server/tool trust scoring
- Threshold-based risk classification
- Human approval for high-risk actions
- Docker-isolated tool execution
- JSONL experiment logging
The planned next stage is a multi-LLM verification framework with specialized security, intent, permission, execution, trust, and judge verifiers.
Proposed Workflow
User Prompt
↓
Intent Context
↓
MCP Tool Discovery
↓
Top-k Tool Retrieval
↓
Risk Verification
↓
Risk-Aware Tool Selection
↓
Execute / Final Verify / Human Approval / Reject
↓
Docker Sandbox
↓
Audit Log
Current Risk Algorithm
For each candidate tool, the prototype calculates:
R = 0.40S + 0.20A + 0.20P + 0.10E + 0.10T
Where:
S= prompt-injection or suspicious-description scoreA= intent-mismatch scoreP= permission-risk scoreE= execution-impact scoreT= MCP server or tool-source trust risk
The security-adjusted selection score is:
Secure Utility = Relevance × (1 - Risk)
Critical-risk tools are excluded before final selection.
Risk Thresholds
| Risk Score | Level | Action |
|---|---|---|
0.00–0.2499 |
Low | Execute in sandbox |
0.25–0.4999 |
Medium | Send to final verifier |
0.50–0.7499 |
High | Require human approval |
0.75–1.00 |
Critical | Reject |
These values are preliminary heuristic settings and will later be calibrated using validation data.
Project Structure
securemcp-sandbox/
│
├── .vscode/
│ ├── launch.json
│ └── tasks.json
│
├── data/
│ └── tools.json
│
├── executor/
│ ├── Dockerfile
│ └── executor.py
│
├── logs/
│
├── src/
│ ├── main.py
│ ├── mcp_server.py
│ ├── retriever.py
│ ├── risk_engine.py
│ └── runner.py
│
├── .gitignore
├── requirements.txt
└── README.md
Requirements
- Python 3.11 or 3.12
- Docker Desktop
- Node.js and npm
- Visual Studio Code
- Git
Setup
1. Clone the repository
git clone https://github.com/Nafeeul/SecureMCP-Agentic.git
cd SecureMCP-Agentic
2. Create a virtual environment
py -m venv .venv
.\.venv\Scripts\Activate.ps1
3. Install dependencies
python -m pip install --upgrade pip
python -m pip install -r requirements.txt
4. Build the Docker executor
Make sure Docker Desktop is running.
docker build -t securemcp-executor .\executor
5. Run the SecureMCP experiment
python .\src\main.py
Example prompt:
Find a New Year's gift under $80 with at least 4.5 stars.
Run the MCP Server
Start the MCP Inspector from the project root:
npx -y @modelcontextprotocol/inspector .venv/Scripts/python.exe src/mcp_server.py
Then open:
Tools → List Tools
The current MCP server exposes:
product_searchgift_suggestionsimulated_email_senderpriority_product_tool
The malicious tool is simulated only. It does not access real data or make network requests.
Docker Safety Controls
Approved tools run inside a restricted Docker container with:
- No network access
- Read-only root filesystem
- Non-root execution
- Dropped Linux capabilities
- No privilege escalation
- CPU and memory limits
- Process-count limits
- Execution timeout
- Explicit tool allow-list
Do not mount personal folders, credentials, Docker sockets, or production services into the sandbox.
Experiment Logs
Each run is saved to:
logs/experiments.jsonl
The log includes:
- User prompt
- Retrieved top-k tools
- Relevance scores
- Individual risk scores
- Final risk level
- Baseline-selected tool
- SecureMCP-selected tool
- Decision
- Sandbox execution result
- Latency
Benchmark Datasets
The planned evaluation will use:
ToolBench
Repository:
https://github.com/OpenBMB/ToolBench
Planned use:
- Large-scale API metadata
- Tool descriptions
- Retrieval experiments
- User instructions
- Top-k candidate testing
API-Bank
Repository:
https://github.com/AlibabaResearch/DAMO-ConvAI/tree/main/api-bank
Planned use:
- User prompts
- Tool-use dialogues
- Expected API calls
- Expected parameters
The benchmark data will be converted into a unified SecureMCP format before testing. Controlled poisoned variants will be generated from selected benign tool descriptions. Real external APIs will not be executed.
推荐服务器
Baidu Map
百度地图核心API现已全面兼容MCP协议,是国内首家兼容MCP协议的地图服务商。
Playwright MCP Server
一个模型上下文协议服务器,它使大型语言模型能够通过结构化的可访问性快照与网页进行交互,而无需视觉模型或屏幕截图。
Magic Component Platform (MCP)
一个由人工智能驱动的工具,可以从自然语言描述生成现代化的用户界面组件,并与流行的集成开发环境(IDE)集成,从而简化用户界面开发流程。
Audiense Insights MCP Server
通过模型上下文协议启用与 Audiense Insights 账户的交互,从而促进营销洞察和受众数据的提取和分析,包括人口统计信息、行为和影响者互动。
VeyraX
一个单一的 MCP 工具,连接你所有喜爱的工具:Gmail、日历以及其他 40 多个工具。
graphlit-mcp-server
模型上下文协议 (MCP) 服务器实现了 MCP 客户端与 Graphlit 服务之间的集成。 除了网络爬取之外,还可以将任何内容(从 Slack 到 Gmail 再到播客订阅源)导入到 Graphlit 项目中,然后从 MCP 客户端检索相关内容。
Kagi MCP Server
一个 MCP 服务器,集成了 Kagi 搜索功能和 Claude AI,使 Claude 能够在回答需要最新信息的问题时执行实时网络搜索。
e2b-mcp-server
使用 MCP 通过 e2b 运行代码。
Neon MCP Server
用于与 Neon 管理 API 和数据库交互的 MCP 服务器
Exa MCP Server
模型上下文协议(MCP)服务器允许像 Claude 这样的 AI 助手使用 Exa AI 搜索 API 进行网络搜索。这种设置允许 AI 模型以安全和受控的方式获取实时的网络信息。