teams-agent-mcp
MCP server that enables agents to interact with Microsoft Teams by listing channels and members, and asking humans questions, with replies routed back to the agent session.
README
MCP Layer
This repo is one of two, and it does not work alone. The full bridge that lets an agent ask a human in Teams and get the answer back:
┌───────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────┐ ┌───────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ │ Microsoft 365 │◄─►│ connector │◄─►│ MCP server │◄─►│ your agent │ │ Teams + Azure Bot │ │ teams-connector │ │ ★ THIS REPO │ │ SaaS/in-house│ └───────────────────┘ └─────────────────┘ └───────────────┘ └──────────────┘Prerequisite: a running teams-connector — that companion repo is the only thing that talks to Microsoft; this service is its client. Deploy it first, then this one, then point your agent here. Order and wiring:
GETTING_STARTED.md.
The agent-facing half of the Teams bridge. It holds one fact the connector deliberately does not: which agent session a Teams thread belongs to.
Teams <-> connector <-> [ MCP layer ] <-> your agent
this service
What it does
- Exposes tools an agent calls:
list_channels,list_channel_members,ask_human. - Stores the
session_id ↔ thread_idmapping — one table,mcp_sessions; the full annotated DDL, column meanings and sizing notes are inDATABASE.md, and the executable copy the service applies at startup ismcp_layer/schema.sql. - Receives each human reply from the connector and delivers it to the session that asked.
Documentation map: deploy step-by-step →
GETTING_STARTED.md · the database →
DATABASE.md · architecture & APIs → this file.
Every API, at a glance
This service EXPOSES 3 surfaces (5 HTTP endpoints total):
| # | Endpoint | Who calls it | What it does |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | /mcp-server/mcp |
your agent (MCP protocol, Streamable HTTP) | connect once, auto-discover and call the 3 tools |
| 2 | GET /tools/channels · GET /tools/members · POST /tools/ask_human |
your agent (plain REST — same 3 tools, for anything that cannot speak MCP) | list channels · list people · post a question |
| 3 | POST /teams-inbound |
the connector | every human reply arrives here and is routed to its session |
Surfaces 1–2 require Authorization: Bearer <MCP_TOOLS_TOKEN>;
surface 3 requires the connector's CONNECTOR_INBOUND_TOKEN.
This service CALLS 2 things:
| Direction | Where | Which endpoints | When |
|---|---|---|---|
| → the teams-connector | CONNECTOR_BASE_URL |
GET /api/connector/channels, GET /members, POST /threads, POST /say |
executing the tools |
| → your consumer | AGENT_CALLBACK_URL (one POST of {session_id, text}) or the SaaS sessions API |
— | delivering each human answer to the session that asked |
That is the complete surface — nothing else listens, nothing else is called.
Using both repos: how this connects to teams-connector
The entire integration between this service and teams-connector is two HTTP links and two shared tokens — there is no other coupling (no shared database, no shared code):
OUTBOUND (the agent asks)
this service ──────────────────────────────► teams-connector
calls: GET /api/connector/channels · GET /members
POST /threads · POST /say
auth: Authorization: Bearer CONNECTOR_API_TOKEN
INBOUND (a human answers)
teams-connector ───────────────────────────► this service
calls: POST /teams-inbound (its CONNECTOR_INBOUND_URL points here)
body: {conversation_id, text, speaker, speaker_email, source}
auth: Authorization: Bearer MCP_INBOUND_TOKEN
The four configuration lines that make it work — two on each side:
| Where | Setting | Must be |
|---|---|---|
| this service | CONNECTOR_BASE_URL |
the connector's base URL |
| this service | CONNECTOR_API_TOKEN |
identical to the connector's CONNECTOR_API_TOKEN |
| the connector | CONNECTOR_INBOUND_URL |
https://<this-host>/teams-inbound |
| the connector | CONNECTOR_INBOUND_TOKEN |
identical to this service's MCP_INBOUND_TOKEN |
Deploy order: connector first, then this service, then go back and set
the connector's CONNECTOR_INBOUND_URL — the loop is closed at that
moment. How the correlation works across the pair: ask_human receives
the new thread's id from POST /threads and stores it against the
calling session; the human's reply arrives at /teams-inbound carrying
that same thread id (Teams stamps it on every in-thread reply), and one
table lookup routes the answer home. If either token pair mismatches,
the symptom is a 401 in the callee's log.
What it deliberately does not do
- Talk to Teams. It never imports the Teams SDK. It calls the connector's HTTP API instead — that is why it is a separate service and why swapping one agent platform for another touches only this layer.
- See unrelated conversations. The connector forwards every channel message; this layer routes only the ones whose thread matches a known session and drops the rest. An agent never sees channel traffic that was not a reply to its own question.
The tools
| Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|
list_channels() |
channels the bot can reach (verify, not route) |
list_channel_members(channel) |
who is in a channel — resolves names to mentions |
ask_human(session_id, channel, recipients, question) |
post a question, bind the thread to the session |
Routing knowledge — which channel is for which program — lives in the
agent's context file, not here. These tools execute and verify; the
agent decides where to ask. If a channel is not installed, ask_human
returns a "please install the bot" message the agent relays to a human.
session_id is passed explicitly, so the layer works whether the
platform injects it or a playbook supplies it.
Reply routing
The connector POSTs every inbound message to /teams-inbound with its
conversation id. This layer looks the thread up: a match is delivered to
the session; anything else returns {"routed": false} and is dropped.
Files in this package
Deployment is configuration only; you do not edit these. A map for readers and reviewers:
| File | What it does |
|---|---|
app.py |
Entry point. Starts the service, mounts the inbound webhook, opens the store. |
inbound.py |
The webhook the connector calls (/teams-inbound) — receives forwarded replies. |
core.py |
The tool logic: list_channels, list_channel_members, ask_human, and reply routing. |
connector_client.py |
HTTP client for the connector's API — this layer's only way to Teams. |
consumer.py |
Delivers an answer to the attached agent (HttpAgent callback, an example SaaS sessions-API adapter, or a recording mock). |
store.py |
The session ↔ thread table (Postgres or SQLite); DDL in schema.sql, explained in DATABASE.md. |
settings.py |
Reads all configuration from the environment. Where config comes in. |
.env.example |
The config file you copy to .env and fill in. |
Dockerfile |
Builds the container image. |
Running
Deployment step-by-step (database options, config table, attaching your
agent platform, verification) lives in
GETTING_STARTED.md. The short form:
cp .env.example .env # fill in — see GETTING_STARTED.md
docker compose up --build # service + PostgreSQL, one command
or without Docker (Python 3.11+):
pip install -r requirements.txt
uvicorn mcp_layer.app:app --host 0.0.0.0 --port 8100
Point the connector's CONNECTOR_INBOUND_URL at
https://<this-host>/teams-inbound. See .env.example for all settings.
Status
Complete and tested in the source monorepo's smoke suite (a mock
consumer and a faked connector prove the full ask → reply → session
loop; no Teams/LLM/network needed): the tool logic, the reply
round-trip, the REST tool port, and the MCP-protocol surface
(Streamable HTTP at /mcp-server/mcp, bearer-gated, tools
auto-discovered via tools/list). The bidirectional flow has also been
verified live against a real tenant. Per-repo CI is on the roadmap.
One piece is deliberately an example rather than a certainty: the SaaS
sessions-API adapter in consumer.py implements one vendor's endpoint
shape. Verify it against your platform's actual API (or add your own
adapter — one method) before relying on it in production.
推荐服务器
Baidu Map
百度地图核心API现已全面兼容MCP协议,是国内首家兼容MCP协议的地图服务商。
Playwright MCP Server
一个模型上下文协议服务器,它使大型语言模型能够通过结构化的可访问性快照与网页进行交互,而无需视觉模型或屏幕截图。
Magic Component Platform (MCP)
一个由人工智能驱动的工具,可以从自然语言描述生成现代化的用户界面组件,并与流行的集成开发环境(IDE)集成,从而简化用户界面开发流程。
Audiense Insights MCP Server
通过模型上下文协议启用与 Audiense Insights 账户的交互,从而促进营销洞察和受众数据的提取和分析,包括人口统计信息、行为和影响者互动。
VeyraX
一个单一的 MCP 工具,连接你所有喜爱的工具:Gmail、日历以及其他 40 多个工具。
graphlit-mcp-server
模型上下文协议 (MCP) 服务器实现了 MCP 客户端与 Graphlit 服务之间的集成。 除了网络爬取之外,还可以将任何内容(从 Slack 到 Gmail 再到播客订阅源)导入到 Graphlit 项目中,然后从 MCP 客户端检索相关内容。
Kagi MCP Server
一个 MCP 服务器,集成了 Kagi 搜索功能和 Claude AI,使 Claude 能够在回答需要最新信息的问题时执行实时网络搜索。
e2b-mcp-server
使用 MCP 通过 e2b 运行代码。
Neon MCP Server
用于与 Neon 管理 API 和数据库交互的 MCP 服务器
Exa MCP Server
模型上下文协议(MCP)服务器允许像 Claude 这样的 AI 助手使用 Exa AI 搜索 API 进行网络搜索。这种设置允许 AI 模型以安全和受控的方式获取实时的网络信息。