vibecheck
Agent-native "safe to ship?" security gate for AI-generated code. Uses real parsers and inter-rocedural taint analysis (JS/TS, Python, Go) to flag the classes AI coding agents get wrong — secrets, SQL injection, SS, SSRF, path traversal, command injection, weak JWT/CORS — and ranks findings by confidence. Exposes a scan tool over MCP.
README
vibecheck
A fast, agent-native "safe to ship?" gate for vibe-coded apps. It parses your JS/TS/JSX/TSX
(@babel/parser), Python (the stdlib ast), and Go (go/parser) with real parsers and uses taint analysis
(inter-procedural for JS/TS, Python, and Go — return-taint + param→sink summaries, within a file and across files) to flag the security classes AI coding agents get wrong — committed secrets, SQL
injection through abstracted raw-query APIs, XSS, SSRF, path traversal, command injection, insecure
deserialization, weak JWT/CORS/cookies — and ranks every finding by confidence so an agent can fix
the real ones and ignore the noise.
vibecheck . # human report (severity + confidence)
vibecheck . --ci # exit 1 only on high-confidence (taint-backed) issues
vibecheck . --json # machine-readable findings for agents / CI
What it is — and what it is not (read this)
vibecheck is not a replacement for Semgrep or
CodeQL. Those are deeper, broader, multi-language engines and you should
run them for full coverage. vibecheck aims to be better on one narrow, measurable axis: a
low-false-positive, taint-backed gate for the AI-vibe-coding failure classes that runs inside agent
loops and pre-commit in milliseconds, with published precision/recall so you can trust the
--ci/MCP signal. Use it alongside the big engines, not instead of them.
| vibecheck | Semgrep | CodeQL | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parsing | real AST (Babel JS/TS/JSX + Python ast) |
real, many langs | real, many langs |
| Data-flow | inter-procedural (return-taint + param→sink; intra-file + cross-file by import) | taint (Pro) | full inter-procedural |
| Languages | JS/TS/JSX/TSX + Python + Go | many | many |
| Speed / infra | ms, local, no account | fast | slower, CI-oriented |
| Agent-native (MCP, confidence gating) | yes, first-class | partial | no |
| Breadth of rules | small, focused | 2000+ | huge |
If you only adopt one general SAST, adopt Semgrep or CodeQL. Adopt vibecheck as the fast agent/CI pre-flight that won't drown an agent in false positives.
Measured quality (not claimed)
Against a labeled benchmark of 91 cases across JS/TS, Python and Go (vulnerable + safe + deliberately
tricky-safe), the core detectors score (see METRICS.md, reproduce with bun benchmark/run.ts):
- Precision 100%, Recall 100%, F1 100% on the corpus.
The tricky-safe cases that produce zero false positives include: parameterized queries, tagged-
template SQL, numeric-coerced and schema-validated input, ORM/RegExp .exec(), Supabase anon /
Stripe publishable keys, hardened cookies, allow-listed CORS, and pinned JWT algorithms — exactly
the patterns a regex linter trips on. This benchmark is curated; for a real-world measurement (9 pinned
OSS repos, 1,218 files, manually triaged), see docs/CORPUS.md — which exposed a
critical bug (Python/Go files weren't being scanned in real scans) and drove precision fixes (relative
redirects, server-source-only SSRF).
Confidence
Every finding has a confidence:
high— a user-input source provably flows into the sink (taint-backed), or a deterministic fact (committed secret, JWTnone). These fail--ciand are what the MCPscantool returns by default.medium— a dangerous sink on a non-literal value with no proven source (e.g.eval(x)).review— a structural smell that needs a human (e.g. a route with no visible auth). Excluded from--ciand from the agent loop by default, so agents never chase phantom work. Add--allto include them.
Install & use
npm i -D @arisrhiannon/vibecheck # or: bun add -d @arisrhiannon/vibecheck (Node >= 20)
vibecheck . --ci
vibecheck explain VC-SQLI
vibecheck mcp # MCP stdio server exposing a `scan` tool (high-confidence by default)
Agents: see AGENTS.md — run vibecheck . --ci before declaring a task done and fix every
high-confidence finding.
JS/TS scanning needs nothing extra. Python scanning requires
python3on PATH; Go scanning requires agotoolchain on PATH (the analyzer is compiled once and cached). If a runtime is absent those files are skipped; if an analyzer fails, a warning is printed to stderr (so a crash never silently drops findings).
Rules (implemented + benchmarked)
Taint-backed: VC-RCE-EVAL, VC-RCE-CHILD-PROCESS, VC-SQLI, VC-XSS-REACT, VC-XSS-DOM, VC-SSRF,
VC-PATH-TRAVERSAL, VC-OPEN-REDIRECT. AST config: VC-CORS-WILDCARD, VC-JWT-NONE,
VC-JWT-UNPINNED, VC-COOKIE-INSECURE, VC-STACK-EXPOSURE. Provenance/secrets: VC-SECRET-* (8),
VC-ENV-COMMITTED/DRIFT/MISSING, VC-NEXT-PUBLIC-SECRET, VC-SUPABASE-SERVICE-ROLE. Advisory:
VC-ROUTE-NO-AUTH (review), VC-INPUT-NO-VALIDATION. Python (VC-PY-*): VC-PY-RCE,
VC-PY-CMDI, VC-PY-SQLI, VC-PY-DESERIALIZE, VC-PY-YAML, VC-PY-SSTI, VC-PY-OPEN-REDIRECT,
VC-PY-PATH. Go (VC-GO-*): VC-GO-CMDI, VC-GO-SQLI, VC-GO-PATH, VC-GO-OPEN-REDIRECT,
VC-GO-SSRF. vibecheck explain <id> prints the fix for each.
Limitations
- JS/TS/JSX/TSX + Python + Go (Python needs
python3, Go needs agotoolchain on PATH). More languages are roadmap (each via its own real parser, never hand-rolled). - Taint scope: JS/TS taint is inter-procedural with real cross-file module resolution — function
summaries carry return-taint and parameter→sink reachability, resolved within a file and across
files via resolved relative imports (named, aliased
a as b, and namespace* as ns), propagated multi-hop by a fixpoint; sanitizers respected. Not tracked (false negatives): re-exports (export { x } from …), default exports, CommonJSrequire/dynamicimport(), bare/package imports, chains deeper than ~7 hops in worst-case file order, methods, and destructured params. Python is also inter-procedural (return-taint + param→sink and class@staticmethodresolution, intra-file and cross-file via resolvedfrom .mod import/import mod; not resolved:import a.bdotted-unaliased,*/re-exports, decorators). Python request sources span Flask, Django, aiohttp (request.match_info,await request.post()), FastAPI/ Starlette (request.query_params/path_params,await request.json()/form()), Tornado, Bottle, Pyramid. Go is inter-procedural within and across packages (return-taint + param→sink; unaliasedpkg.Funcresolves by package name). Aliased package imports (import u "…/util") and multi-return assignments (x, _ := f(src)) are not tracked. - Config/secret rules are pattern-based where AST adds no value.
- A high-signal gate and early-warning — not a proof of security. Pair it with Semgrep/CodeQL and review.
Config — .vibecheck.json
{ "ignoreRules": ["VC-INPUT-NO-VALIDATION"], "allowPaths": ["test/**"], "failSeverity": "high" }
License
MIT © 2026 Aris Rhiannon — see LICENSE.
推荐服务器
Baidu Map
百度地图核心API现已全面兼容MCP协议,是国内首家兼容MCP协议的地图服务商。
Playwright MCP Server
一个模型上下文协议服务器,它使大型语言模型能够通过结构化的可访问性快照与网页进行交互,而无需视觉模型或屏幕截图。
Magic Component Platform (MCP)
一个由人工智能驱动的工具,可以从自然语言描述生成现代化的用户界面组件,并与流行的集成开发环境(IDE)集成,从而简化用户界面开发流程。
Audiense Insights MCP Server
通过模型上下文协议启用与 Audiense Insights 账户的交互,从而促进营销洞察和受众数据的提取和分析,包括人口统计信息、行为和影响者互动。
VeyraX
一个单一的 MCP 工具,连接你所有喜爱的工具:Gmail、日历以及其他 40 多个工具。
graphlit-mcp-server
模型上下文协议 (MCP) 服务器实现了 MCP 客户端与 Graphlit 服务之间的集成。 除了网络爬取之外,还可以将任何内容(从 Slack 到 Gmail 再到播客订阅源)导入到 Graphlit 项目中,然后从 MCP 客户端检索相关内容。
Kagi MCP Server
一个 MCP 服务器,集成了 Kagi 搜索功能和 Claude AI,使 Claude 能够在回答需要最新信息的问题时执行实时网络搜索。
e2b-mcp-server
使用 MCP 通过 e2b 运行代码。
Neon MCP Server
用于与 Neon 管理 API 和数据库交互的 MCP 服务器
Exa MCP Server
模型上下文协议(MCP)服务器允许像 Claude 这样的 AI 助手使用 Exa AI 搜索 API 进行网络搜索。这种设置允许 AI 模型以安全和受控的方式获取实时的网络信息。