voyager-agent

voyager-agent

MCP server that runs a unified mission across multiple read-only senses (repo, net, browser) and returns a claim graph with verdicts, contradictions, and next-step probes.

Category
访问服务器

README

@dir-ai/voyager-agent

The one universal Voyager. A thin, model-independent orchestrator that turns the modular Voyager senses — voyager-repo (code), voyager-net (hosts), and the cognitive contract that binds them — into a single agent. You name a goal; Voyager activates the senses it needs, runs a live mission, links the evidence into one graph, and concludes.

It is composition, not a monolith. The agent never absorbs the senses — it calls the published organs and adapts what they see into the shared CognitiveClaim substrate. The reasoning model is a swappable seam (Brain); a rule-based brain ships so it runs with no LLM at all.

Sensing is autonomous. Acting is not. Every sense here is read-only. Any remediation a mission surfaces is carried as a consent-gated, withheld action and is never applied by this orchestrator.

Install

npm i -g @dir-ai/voyager-agent

Use

# Orient in a repo and flag risk (voyager-repo)
voyager-agent mission "audit this project" --repo .

# Audit ONE host you own (voyager-net — fail-closed, needs --authorized)
voyager-agent mission "check my server's exposure" --host example.com --authorized

# Observe a live page (voyager-browser — read-only, static HTML)
voyager-agent mission "check my landing page" --url https://example.com

# All three senses in one mission; vet 10 dependencies; machine-readable
voyager-agent mission "full audit" --repo . --host example.com --authorized --url https://example.com --check-deps 10 --json

Senses fan out in parallel and are resilient: a sense that errors (or even throws) becomes a low-confidence, flagged observation — it never crashes the mission or discards a sibling sense's good result.

The mission then re-plans: it picks the single most informative next probe (by information gain) and executes it, bounded by maxRounds. How a probe is executed is an injectable dispatch seam (the model decides); the safe default only ever re-reads (deepens repo dependency-vetting) and never acts. A verify claim closes the mission so state().satisfied is meaningful.

Voyager — one agent, one entry.
goal: "orient in this repo and flag risk"

  👁 observe  [repo]  (70% · moderate)
     @dir-ai/voyager-agent@0.1.0 — The one universal Voyager…
     ↳ [low] no-lockfile: no lockfile — installed versions are not pinned/reproducible
  🧠 infer  [memory]  (70% · moderate)
     repo observed; 0 high/critical signal(s). No high-severity issue surfaced.

next probe: [repo] open src/index.ts

As an MCP server

One tool, run_mission — describe a goal, get back the full claim graph.

voyager-agent mcp            # stdio
{
  "command": "voyager-agent",
  "args": ["mcp"]
}

As a library

import { runMission, DeterministicBrain, type Brain } from '@dir-ai/voyager-agent'

const { mission } = await runMission(
  'audit this repo and my host',
  { repoPath: '.', host: 'example.com', authorized: true /* your own host */ },
  Date.now(),
)

for (const claim of mission.allClaims()) console.log(claim.operation, claim.sense, claim.verdict)
console.log(mission.state().bestNextProbe)   // the most informative next step
console.log(mission.state().contradictions)  // where two senses disagree

Bring your own model

The Brain interface is the whole point — it's where an LLM plugs in without touching the senses, the memory, or the mission machinery. A ready-made LlmBrain ships: give it one model-agnostic complete() function and it plans and synthesizes through the model. Wire Claude, a local server, or any OpenAI-compatible endpoint — Voyager never depends on a specific SDK.

import { runMission, LlmBrain } from '@dir-ai/voyager-agent'

const brain = new LlmBrain({
  // Return the model's text for these messages — that's the whole dependency.
  async complete(messages) {
    const res = await myModel.chat(messages)   // Claude, local, OpenAI-compatible…
    return res.text
  },
})

await runMission('audit this repo and my host', { repoPath: '.', brain }, Date.now())

LlmBrain is fail-safe: if the model errors or returns unparseable output, it degrades to the built-in rule-based brain for that step — a bad completion can never take a mission down, only make it less clever once. You can also implement the Brain interface directly for full control.

How it works

        intent ─▶ Brain.decompose ─▶ goals
                        │
          ┌─────────────┼───────────────┐
          ▼             ▼                ▼
   voyager-repo    voyager-net      (more senses…)
     scout()         scan()
          │             │
          ▼             ▼
      adapters: brief ─▶ CognitiveClaim
          │             │
          └──────▶ MissionGraph ◀───────┘
                 (contradictions, causal chain,
                  best-next-probe, memory)
                        │
                        ▼
              Brain.synthesize ─▶ conclusion

Each sense produces a CognitiveClaim; the MissionGraph links them — auto-detecting cross-sense contradictions, assembling the causal chain, and surfacing the single most informative next probe by information gain. A sense error becomes a low-confidence observe claim flagged with the unknown — never a false "all clear".

The Voyager family

Package Sense What it does
@dir-ai/voyager web verified-internet retrieval, OSV-gated
@dir-ai/voyager-repo code orient in a repository, vet dependencies
@dir-ai/voyager-net hosts authorized, read-only host audit
@dir-ai/voyager-contract the cognitive contract the senses speak
@dir-ai/voyager-agent all the one agent that composes them

Safety

  • Read-only senses. Nothing is installed, executed, or mutated on your systems.
  • Fail-closed host audit. A host is only scanned with --authorized / authorized: true; single host only (no ranges/URLs), cloud-metadata blocked.
  • Consent-gated action. Remediation is described and withheld, surfaced as an unknown on the claim — this orchestrator never applies it.
  • Honest uncertainty. Confidence and strength are explicit; a sense error is a flagged unknown, not a clean verdict.

License

MIT © dir-ai

推荐服务器

Baidu Map

Baidu Map

百度地图核心API现已全面兼容MCP协议,是国内首家兼容MCP协议的地图服务商。

官方
精选
JavaScript
Playwright MCP Server

Playwright MCP Server

一个模型上下文协议服务器,它使大型语言模型能够通过结构化的可访问性快照与网页进行交互,而无需视觉模型或屏幕截图。

官方
精选
TypeScript
Magic Component Platform (MCP)

Magic Component Platform (MCP)

一个由人工智能驱动的工具,可以从自然语言描述生成现代化的用户界面组件,并与流行的集成开发环境(IDE)集成,从而简化用户界面开发流程。

官方
精选
本地
TypeScript
Audiense Insights MCP Server

Audiense Insights MCP Server

通过模型上下文协议启用与 Audiense Insights 账户的交互,从而促进营销洞察和受众数据的提取和分析,包括人口统计信息、行为和影响者互动。

官方
精选
本地
TypeScript
VeyraX

VeyraX

一个单一的 MCP 工具,连接你所有喜爱的工具:Gmail、日历以及其他 40 多个工具。

官方
精选
本地
graphlit-mcp-server

graphlit-mcp-server

模型上下文协议 (MCP) 服务器实现了 MCP 客户端与 Graphlit 服务之间的集成。 除了网络爬取之外,还可以将任何内容(从 Slack 到 Gmail 再到播客订阅源)导入到 Graphlit 项目中,然后从 MCP 客户端检索相关内容。

官方
精选
TypeScript
Kagi MCP Server

Kagi MCP Server

一个 MCP 服务器,集成了 Kagi 搜索功能和 Claude AI,使 Claude 能够在回答需要最新信息的问题时执行实时网络搜索。

官方
精选
Python
e2b-mcp-server

e2b-mcp-server

使用 MCP 通过 e2b 运行代码。

官方
精选
Neon MCP Server

Neon MCP Server

用于与 Neon 管理 API 和数据库交互的 MCP 服务器

官方
精选
Exa MCP Server

Exa MCP Server

模型上下文协议(MCP)服务器允许像 Claude 这样的 AI 助手使用 Exa AI 搜索 API 进行网络搜索。这种设置允许 AI 模型以安全和受控的方式获取实时的网络信息。

官方
精选