woodpecker-mcp
Exposes a materialized service dependency graph as an MCP toolset for persistent, queryable root-cause analysis via Cypher queries.
README
woodpecker-mcp
woodpecker-mcp exposes a materialized service dependency graph as an MCP toolset. It provides an LLM-based agent such as HolmesGPT with a capability those agents do not retain on their own: a persistent, queryable graph of how services depend on one another. Root-cause analysis therefore becomes a deterministic graph traversal rather than a conclusion re-derived on each investigation.
HolmesGPT remains unmodified. It launches woodpecker-mcp as a subprocess (or connects over HTTP) and discovers the tools it exposes - no fork, custom image, or plugin is required.
Why this exists
HolmesGPT markets a "Runtime Dependency Graph", yet its source holds no graph data structure, no graph database, and no graph-traversal code. Each investigation infers the relationships on the fly - from traces, Kubernetes owner-refs, and metric labels - then discards them, and root cause is whatever the model concludes through a "five whys" prompt. That design is deliberate - it buys freshness, statelessness, and breadth - but it carries costs that a materialized graph removes:
| Holmes (inferred) | woodpecker-mcp (materialized) | |
|---|---|---|
| Where relationships live | model context, one investigation | a graph database (FalkorDB) |
| Root cause | reasoned per run (non-deterministic) | deepest-failing-service, one Cypher query (exact, repeatable) |
| Blast radius | re-derived each time | variable-length path traversal |
| Explore it yourself | no | yes (browser UI + Cypher) |
| Blind-spot detection | no | yes |
How it works
flowchart TD
H["MCP client (e.g. HolmesGPT)"] -->|stdio or HTTP| S["server.py - FastMCP tools"]
S -->|refresh| B[build.refresh]
S -->|diagnose| D[diagnose.py]
B -->|reads live state| C["sources/<br/>topology: docker / k8s / traces<br/>metrics: prometheus / datadog"]
B -->|materializes| G[("FalkorDB<br/>dependency graph")]
D -->|"Cypher: roots, blast radius, paths"| G
The graph is rebuilt from live sources on each query (or from a static topology file), then all reasoning runs as Cypher against the store.
Quickstart
HolmesGPT already ships the MCP client, so wiring is config-only - no fork, image, or plugin to build. Install, then let woodpecker-mcp configure itself:
pip install holmesgpt woodpecker-mcp
woodpecker-mcp init # guided Q&A -> writes a filled-in .env
woodpecker-mcp setup # starts the graph backend, waits until ready, registers the toolset
holmes ask "find the root cause of the current incident"
init asks a few questions (graph backend, topology, metrics) and writes a
.env. setup starts FalkorDB and merges the woodpecker-graph toolset into
~/.holmes/config.yaml, so holmes ask picks it up automatically - no -t flag
needed.
Other setups, all in the integration guide: no Docker or air-gapped (the embedded Kuzu backend), wiring the toolset YAML by hand, in-cluster over HTTP for the Holmes Operator, and the full configuration reference.
Tools
| Tool | Returns |
|---|---|
woodpecker_get_topology |
the materialized graph (services, status, deps) |
woodpecker_diagnose_root_cause |
deepest-failing-service + causal chains + blast radius + blind spots + page verdict |
woodpecker_get_blast_radius(service, direction) |
transitive upstream/downstream closure |
woodpecker_get_service_health(service) |
per-service drill-down |
woodpecker_detect_blind_spots |
healthy-but-unmonitored services |
Explore the graph
FalkorDB ships a browser. Open http://localhost:3000, pick the woodpecker
graph, and run OpenCypher visually, e.g. the blast radius of db:
MATCH (a:Service)-[:DEPENDS_ON*1..20]->(:Service {name:'db'}) RETURN a
Or from Python:
from falkordb import FalkorDB
g = FalkorDB(host="localhost", port=6379).select_graph("woodpecker")
g.query("MATCH (a:Service)-[:DEPENDS_ON*1..20]->(:Service {name:'db'}) "
"RETURN a.name").result_set
CLI (standalone)
woodpecker-mcp topology # rebuild + print the service graph
woodpecker-mcp diagnose # rebuild + print root-cause analysis
woodpecker-mcp refresh # rebuild the graph only
woodpecker-mcp serve [--http] [--port 8000] # run the MCP server
# study a topology offline, no live infra:
woodpecker-mcp ingest examples/topology.example.json
WP_AUTO_REFRESH=0 woodpecker-mcp diagnose
Configuration
Everything has a working default; set only what points at your infra. Run
woodpecker-mcp init to generate a .env from a guided Q&A, or put the WP_*
vars in the toolset's env: block. Three independent seams, mixed and matched:
- graph (
WP_GRAPH_BACKEND):falkordb(server, default) orkuzu(embedded, no Docker - good for air-gapped) - topology (
WP_TOPOLOGY):docker,k8s, ortraces(Jaeger) - metrics (
WP_METRICS_BACKEND):prometheus(or any PromQL-compatible backend) ordatadog
Either graph backend sits behind one GraphStore interface (Neo4j/Memgraph drop
in the same way). Every variable, with per-backend deep-dives, validation
commands, and troubleshooting, is in
docs/CONFIGURATION.md.
Layout
woodpecker_mcp/
server.py FastMCP tools, stdio + HTTP
store.py GraphStore interface; FalkorGraphStore (default), KuzuGraphStore
build.py rebuild the graph from sources, or ingest a static topology
diagnose.py deterministic root-cause verdict from store queries
sources/ TopologySource (docker, k8s, traces) + MetricsSource (prometheus, datadog)
schema.py status vocabulary
cli.py init | setup | serve | topology | diagnose | refresh | ingest
scaffold.py init/setup helpers (.env, FalkorDB, Holmes config)
examples/ holmesgpt-toolset.yaml, k8s-deployment.yaml, topology.example.json
docs/ CONFIGURATION.md
tests/ unit tests (test_*.py) + smoke_mcp.py (integration)
Development
pip install -e ".[dev]" # pytest + ruff
pre-commit install # ruff lint on every commit
pre-commit install --hook-type pre-push # unit tests before every push
pytest # unit tests - no services needed
ruff check . # lint (ruff format . to auto-format)
Unit tests (tests/test_*.py) run offline against fakes. The stdio integration
check needs a live FalkorDB:
docker run -d -p 6379:6379 -p 3000:3000 falkordb/falkordb:latest
python tests/smoke_mcp.py
License
woodpecker-mcp is licensed under Apache-2.0. It connects to FalkorDB as a client and does not redistribute it; FalkorDB itself is SSPL-licensed (source-available) - fine for self-hosting, relevant only if you offer FalkorDB as a managed service.
推荐服务器
Baidu Map
百度地图核心API现已全面兼容MCP协议,是国内首家兼容MCP协议的地图服务商。
Playwright MCP Server
一个模型上下文协议服务器,它使大型语言模型能够通过结构化的可访问性快照与网页进行交互,而无需视觉模型或屏幕截图。
Magic Component Platform (MCP)
一个由人工智能驱动的工具,可以从自然语言描述生成现代化的用户界面组件,并与流行的集成开发环境(IDE)集成,从而简化用户界面开发流程。
Audiense Insights MCP Server
通过模型上下文协议启用与 Audiense Insights 账户的交互,从而促进营销洞察和受众数据的提取和分析,包括人口统计信息、行为和影响者互动。
VeyraX
一个单一的 MCP 工具,连接你所有喜爱的工具:Gmail、日历以及其他 40 多个工具。
graphlit-mcp-server
模型上下文协议 (MCP) 服务器实现了 MCP 客户端与 Graphlit 服务之间的集成。 除了网络爬取之外,还可以将任何内容(从 Slack 到 Gmail 再到播客订阅源)导入到 Graphlit 项目中,然后从 MCP 客户端检索相关内容。
Kagi MCP Server
一个 MCP 服务器,集成了 Kagi 搜索功能和 Claude AI,使 Claude 能够在回答需要最新信息的问题时执行实时网络搜索。
e2b-mcp-server
使用 MCP 通过 e2b 运行代码。
Neon MCP Server
用于与 Neon 管理 API 和数据库交互的 MCP 服务器
Exa MCP Server
模型上下文协议(MCP)服务器允许像 Claude 这样的 AI 助手使用 Exa AI 搜索 API 进行网络搜索。这种设置允许 AI 模型以安全和受控的方式获取实时的网络信息。