zopaf-mcp
Negotiation math engine for AI agents. Computes Pareto frontiers, generates iso-utility counteroffers, and infers counterpart priorities. 9 tools for any multi-issue negotiation. Zero LLM tokens — pure MILP optimization.
README
Zopaf Negotiation Engine -- MCP Server
A negotiation math engine exposed as MCP tools that any AI agent can call. Zopaf computes Pareto frontiers, generates iso-utility counteroffers, and infers counterpart priorities from their reactions -- all through pure MILP optimization. Zero LLM tokens burned. The calling agent handles the conversation; Zopaf handles the math.
Quick Start
Claude Desktop
Add to your Claude Desktop configuration (claude_desktop_config.json):
{
"mcpServers": {
"zopaf": {
"type": "streamable-http",
"url": "https://zopaf-mcp-production.up.railway.app/mcp"
}
}
}
Claude Code
claude mcp add zopaf --transport streamable-http https://zopaf-mcp-production.up.railway.app/mcp
Generic MCP Client
Connect to the Streamable HTTP endpoint:
URL: https://zopaf-mcp-production.up.railway.app/mcp
Transport: Streamable HTTP
Tools Reference
| Tool | Description |
|---|---|
create_session |
Create a new negotiation session. Returns a session_id used by all other tools. |
add_issue |
Add a negotiable issue/term with options ordered worst to best for the user. |
set_issue_range |
Set the acceptable range for a numeric issue, enabling 0-100 scoring. |
record_preference |
Record that the user prioritizes some issues over others. Updates the weight model. |
set_batna |
Record the user's alternatives if the deal falls through. Determines leverage. |
generate_counteroffers |
Generate 3 iso-utility counteroffers to present simultaneously. |
process_counterpart_response |
Process the counterpart's reaction to infer their priorities and generate a round-2 offer. |
analyze_deal |
Score a specific deal against the Pareto frontier. Shows value captured and suggested trades. |
get_negotiation_state |
Get current model state: issues, weights, BATNA, frontier size, and recommended next step. |
How It Works
-
Create session -- Initialize a new negotiation model with
create_session. -
Add issues -- Define the terms on the table with
add_issue. Each issue includes options ordered worst to best for the user (e.g., Salary:['$150K', '$160K', '$170K', '$180K']). -
Set ranges -- For numeric issues, call
set_issue_rangeto map values onto a 0-100 scoring scale. -
Record preferences -- Call
record_preferenceas you learn what the user cares about. Each call updates the internal weight model. -
Set BATNA -- Use
set_batnato record alternatives. The number and quality determines leverage strength and anchoring strategy. -
Generate 3 counteroffers -- Call
generate_counteroffersto produce three packages that are equally good for the user but structured differently. Present ALL THREE simultaneously. Never lead with one and fall back to another. -
Process counterpart response -- Call
process_counterpart_responsewith which package they preferred and what they pushed back on. The engine infers their hidden priorities. -
Get round-2 offer -- Returns a refined offer on the efficient frontier, with value split weighted by leverage.
Example: Job Offer Negotiation
create_session
-> {"session_id": "a1b2c3d4"}
add_issue(session_id="a1b2c3d4", issue_name="Salary", options=["$150K", "$160K", "$170K", "$180K"])
add_issue(session_id="a1b2c3d4", issue_name="Equity", options=["0.1%", "0.25%", "0.5%", "0.75%"])
add_issue(session_id="a1b2c3d4", issue_name="Signing Bonus", options=["$0", "$10K", "$20K", "$30K"])
add_issue(session_id="a1b2c3d4", issue_name="Remote Work", options=["On-site", "Hybrid", "Fully Remote"])
set_issue_range(issue_name="Salary", worst_acceptable=150000, best_hoped=180000,
option_values={"$150K": 150000, "$160K": 160000, "$170K": 170000, "$180K": 180000})
-> {"scores": {"$150K": 0.0, "$160K": 33.3, "$170K": 66.7, "$180K": 100.0}}
record_preference(preferred_issues=["Salary", "Equity"], over_issues=["Signing Bonus", "Remote Work"])
-> {"learned_weights": {"Salary": 0.345, "Equity": 0.345, "Signing Bonus": 0.155, "Remote Work": 0.155}}
set_batna(alternatives=["Competing offer from Company B at $165K", "Stay in current role"])
-> {"leverage_strength": "strong"}
generate_counteroffers(target_satisfaction="ambitious")
-> {
"counteroffers": [
{"label": "A", "terms": {"Salary": "$180K", "Equity": "0.25%", "Signing Bonus": "$10K", "Remote Work": "On-site"}},
{"label": "B", "terms": {"Salary": "$170K", "Equity": "0.5%", "Signing Bonus": "$0", "Remote Work": "Hybrid"}},
{"label": "C", "terms": {"Salary": "$160K", "Equity": "0.75%", "Signing Bonus": "$20K", "Remote Work": "On-site"}}
]
}
process_counterpart_response(preferred_package="B", pushback_issues=["Equity"])
-> {
"counterpart_priorities_inferred": {"Equity": 0.571, "Salary": 0.143, ...},
"round_2_offer": {"Salary": "$180K", "Equity": "0.25%", "Signing Bonus": "$20K", "Remote Work": "Hybrid"},
"value_split": "User gets 75% of surplus"
}
The engine inferred that the counterpart cares most about equity (57% of their weight). The round-2 offer concedes on equity -- where it costs the user less -- and captures value on salary and signing bonus. Both sides improve. The user captures 75% of the surplus based on their strong BATNA.
Use Cases
- Job offers -- Salary, equity, bonus, title, remote work, start date, PTO
- VC term sheets -- Valuation, board seats, liquidation preferences, anti-dilution, pro-rata rights
- Real estate -- Price, closing date, contingencies, repairs, inclusions, rent-back periods
- Vendor contracts -- Price, SLA guarantees, payment terms, exclusivity, renewal clauses
- Salary negotiations -- Base pay, bonus structure, review timeline, scope of role
- Business partnerships -- Revenue split, IP ownership, decision rights, exit clauses, territory
- Legal settlements -- Monetary terms, non-disclosure terms, admission of liability, timeline
Why Zero Tokens?
Zopaf is a math engine, not a language model. It runs MILP optimization and combinatorial scoring -- operations that are computationally cheap but tedious for an LLM to attempt in-context.
Your agent's LLM handles the conversation with the user, asks the right questions, and explains the strategy. Zopaf handles the optimization -- computing Pareto frontiers, generating iso-utility packages, solving preference weights from revealed choices, and positioning offers on the efficient frontier.
You bring the brain. Zopaf brings the calculator.
推荐服务器
Baidu Map
百度地图核心API现已全面兼容MCP协议,是国内首家兼容MCP协议的地图服务商。
Playwright MCP Server
一个模型上下文协议服务器,它使大型语言模型能够通过结构化的可访问性快照与网页进行交互,而无需视觉模型或屏幕截图。
Magic Component Platform (MCP)
一个由人工智能驱动的工具,可以从自然语言描述生成现代化的用户界面组件,并与流行的集成开发环境(IDE)集成,从而简化用户界面开发流程。
Audiense Insights MCP Server
通过模型上下文协议启用与 Audiense Insights 账户的交互,从而促进营销洞察和受众数据的提取和分析,包括人口统计信息、行为和影响者互动。
VeyraX
一个单一的 MCP 工具,连接你所有喜爱的工具:Gmail、日历以及其他 40 多个工具。
graphlit-mcp-server
模型上下文协议 (MCP) 服务器实现了 MCP 客户端与 Graphlit 服务之间的集成。 除了网络爬取之外,还可以将任何内容(从 Slack 到 Gmail 再到播客订阅源)导入到 Graphlit 项目中,然后从 MCP 客户端检索相关内容。
Kagi MCP Server
一个 MCP 服务器,集成了 Kagi 搜索功能和 Claude AI,使 Claude 能够在回答需要最新信息的问题时执行实时网络搜索。
e2b-mcp-server
使用 MCP 通过 e2b 运行代码。
Neon MCP Server
用于与 Neon 管理 API 和数据库交互的 MCP 服务器
Exa MCP Server
模型上下文协议(MCP)服务器允许像 Claude 这样的 AI 助手使用 Exa AI 搜索 API 进行网络搜索。这种设置允许 AI 模型以安全和受控的方式获取实时的网络信息。